Re: Pakistan/Australia series
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 5:00 pm
Armchair expert wrote:locky801 wrote:May as well call stumps and head to the pub, this is a waste of time
Not sure there are many pubs in Pakistan
plenty just googled it
Armchair expert wrote:locky801 wrote:May as well call stumps and head to the pub, this is a waste of time
Not sure there are many pubs in Pakistan
whufc wrote:4/552 vs 10/476
Probably fair to say we have been a little bit out played.
locky801 wrote:whufc wrote:4/552 vs 10/476
Probably fair to say we have been a little bit out played.
i'd open the bowling after lunch with Usman and Carey
Make that 4/706 for Pakistan for the match mate.whufc wrote:4/552 vs 10/476
Probably fair to say we have been a little bit out played.
whufc wrote:Bloody embarrassing for us……yes it’s a road but the pakis found a way to get ten wickets
4/724.
Not a great start to life after Langer.
We just dont seem to have any idea how to manufacture some wickets on the sub continent
whufc wrote:Bloody embarrassing for us……yes it’s a road but the pakis found a way to get ten wickets
4/724.
Not a great start to life after Langer.
We just dont seem to have any idea how to manufacture some wickets on the sub continent
whufc wrote:Bloody embarrassing for us……yes it’s a road but the pakis found a way to get ten wickets
4/724.
Not a great start to life after Langer.
We just dont seem to have any idea how to manufacture some wickets on the sub continent
The Dark Knight wrote:whufc wrote:Bloody embarrassing for us……yes it’s a road but the pakis found a way to get ten wickets
4/724.
Not a great start to life after Langer.
We just dont seem to have any idea how to manufacture some wickets on the sub continent
Hang on, the Pakistan didn't really find a way to get 10 wickets themselves, they were helped by some stupid decisions and poor shot selections from the Aussie batsman- Khawaja, Smith especially and Green gifted their wickets to them.
Australia were obviously out batted though, credit to Pakistan especially their openers to be discipline enough to not throw their wickets away and completely deny the Aussie bowlers.
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Bloody embarrassing for us……yes it’s a road but the pakis found a way to get ten wickets
4/724.
Not a great start to life after Langer.
We just dont seem to have any idea how to manufacture some wickets on the sub continent
Palleeease don't go there, if anything, he would've made our quicks continue bowling as punishment for not getting wickets.
As TDK said, there were very few wickets that were not batter's error, chuck in the fact it's everyone's first hit over there and oh yeah, a couple of key inspirational icons passed away during the test as well.
Yes, we made an error at the selection table, Boland's omission is somewhat debatable and either Swepson or Agar needed to be included, probably at the expense of Starc.
Anyway, it's all hindsight and we are still in the box seat of holding the trophy, move on to Karachi and hopefully they bat first again.
Lightning McQueen wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:whufc wrote:Bloody embarrassing for us……yes it’s a road but the pakis found a way to get ten wickets
4/724.
Not a great start to life after Langer.
We just dont seem to have any idea how to manufacture some wickets on the sub continent
Hang on, the Pakistan didn't really find a way to get 10 wickets themselves, they were helped by some stupid decisions and poor shot selections from the Aussie batsman- Khawaja, Smith especially and Green gifted their wickets to them.
Australia were obviously out batted though, credit to Pakistan especially their openers to be discipline enough to not throw their wickets away and completely deny the Aussie bowlers.
Yes, credit where credit is due but when Smith, Labba, Head and Usi bowl 40% of our overs it hasn't caused much damage.