Page 1 of 4
Blues vs. Backs
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:43 amby Rik E Boy
Just about to start. SA bowling first on what looks like a bowler friendly wicket - greenish with plenty of moisture. The curator put some water into it becauase it has been dry in Sydney but was caught out by overnight rain.
With no Magill and the Backs boasting an awesome attack, I'd expect the Redbacks to win this one so Jaques the key early doors and also Haddin obviously a key wicket. Go the Blues!!
regards,
REB
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:53 amby Rik E Boy
Steady start by the Blues. At drinks (13.5) NSW 1/56, Simmons the man out caugh Manou bowled Dizzy for 26. Jaques looking rusty (dropped by Cosgrove earlier) and young Christian has nearly run himself out first ball!
regards,
REB
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:52 pmby mal
Small ground REB, I think NSW need 275 to be competitive.
4/151 AFTER 32 OVERS
252 would be a likely score at this stage.
SA I think will be the o/d champs this year.
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:20 pmby sydney-dog
watching the game on fox, SA fell away badly
on Cosgrove, if this kid wants to play in the world cup he needs to improve his fielding in quick time
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:44 pmby magpie in the 80's
sydney-dog wrote:watching the game on fox, SA fell away badly
on Cosgrove, if this kid wants to play in the world cup he needs to improve his fielding in quick time
S/D if S.A. fell away badly how about a updated score
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:51 pmby sydney-dog
sorry guys
thought the game would be live in to SA
NSW 5/291 after 50 overs
rain has delayed start of the 2nd innings
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:56 pmby magpie in the 80's
unfortunately i live in canberra S/D and its not on here
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:43 pmby sydney-dog
score update
revised total 267 of 43 overs
Elliott and Cosgrove opening the innings
SA 0/39 AFTER 6 OVERS
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:59 pmby sydney-dog
SA 0 / 62 AFTER 10
Elliott looking good 29no
Cosgrove 28no
suprise NSW have stuck with opening bowlers, you would of thought given the start they would of made a change by now
No McGill, NSW may struggle to contain SA on a small oval
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:05 pmby sydney-dog
Hauritz, first ball for NSW, hits the wood work Cosgroves out for 31, SA 1/66
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:19 pmby mal
sydney-dog wrote:Hauritz, first ball for NSW, hits the wood work Cosgroves out for 31, SA 1/66
Cossie made the mistake of playing for the spin !!!
Slow outfield makes it harder.
SA 1/84OF 14.5 OVERS.
Elliot just hit a six of Thornley.
NSW has a very average attack, we can still win.
TA beat QLD by 7 wickets in the Pura Cup game at the Gabba.
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:20 pmby sydney-dog
After a frustrating season, Elliott looking the goods
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:29 pmby sydney-dog
Bluey has continued with last seasons form, looking very very scratchy and needs to start playing some shots
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:30 pmby Rooster_cracker
SA 1/95 looking good. but theirs more rain about.
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:34 pmby sydney-dog
1/99 after 18
elliott 53no
SA needs to keep ahead of the target rate just in case more rain or bad light stops play
Bluey needs to provide more support
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 4:58 pmby sydney-dog
Bluey out for a very ugly 26 of 43
SA 2 / 124 of 23.5
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:01 pmby Maddogmike
What an idiot - the wicket caused SA to need to be 131 after that over. If they go off now SA behind the rate! Class act Blewett.
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:03 pmby sydney-dog
not to mention he got caught off a waist height full toss that should of been hit out of the ground
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:06 pmby sydney-dog
with 9 runs now required per over and Hauritz bowling I would of thought Boof or Manou would of come in and took control off the game
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:16 pmby sydney-dog
SA need couple big overs
127 required off 90 balls
8 wickets in hand