Australia v England ODI Tonight.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:10 pmGame starts in about 20 minutes.
AUSTRALIA $1-30
ENGLAND....$3-30
Australia too short for me.
Toss will be important.
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:10 pmPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:21 pmPosted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:58 pmPonting won the toss and sent England in.
England 0/24 after 5.1 overs.
England 0/24 after 5.1 overs.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:59 pmMake that 28/0.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 8:05 pmI'll take McGrath off, 12 runs off 1.2 overs.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:46 pmupdate after 28 overs
england 3 for 111
strauss 52
yardy 0 (9)
WATSON 2 for
england 3 for 111
strauss 52
yardy 0 (9)
WATSON 2 for
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:52 pm4 down 115, Strauss out 56 ct Gilly, b Symonds
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:53 pmafter 29 overs 4 -115
strauss c gilly b. symonds 56
strauss c gilly b. symonds 56
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:57 pmUmpires - Bowden (NZ) and Bucknor (WI)
TV Umpire - Harper (Aust)
Match Ref - J Crowe (NZ - let's all throw a phone)
Reserve Umpire - S Taufel (Aust)
TV Umpire - Harper (Aust)
Match Ref - J Crowe (NZ - let's all throw a phone)
Reserve Umpire - S Taufel (Aust)
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:00 pmAs I keep telling you guys WATSON is the allrounding answer.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:01 pmmal wrote:As I keep telling you guys WATSON is the allrounding answer.
And you'll continue to do so in the future.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:04 pmAnother one to Watson, Yardy out Ct Gilly b watson 4
126/5
126/5
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:07 pmnow 5 for 126
watson now 3 wickets
watson now 3 wickets
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:08 pmENGLAND 5/127
MALS protigy 3/11(watson)
MALS protigy 3/11(watson)
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:08 pmDinglinga, I think your a touch behind.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:19 pm6 for 135 now
oh the poms!!!!
oh the poms!!!!
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:24 pmPOMS must be concerned about their depth, the have some injury concerns and I don't see too much quality coming thru
On Watson, the issue is we do not have 3 or 4 quality all rounders in the country challenging, it's either Watson, Roy or we play 7 batsmen, that's why the selectors have shown so much patience
On Watson, the issue is we do not have 3 or 4 quality all rounders in the country challenging, it's either Watson, Roy or we play 7 batsmen, that's why the selectors have shown so much patience
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:25 pmOnce the openers went, it has been all down hill for the poms.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:26 pm7/136
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:26 pmMcGrath took the 7th wicket.