Page 1 of 1
Former cricket umpire on child sex charges
Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:21 pmby dinglinga
A FORMER international cricket umpire will face court in Brisbane today on 12 child sex charges.
The man is alleged to have indecently assaulted the four complainants on different occasions between 1974 and 1998.
The offences against the two 14-year-old males are alleged to have occurred in 1974 and the two 16-year-old females in 1983 and 1998.
In relation to one 14-year-old, the man has been charged with five counts of indecent assault on a male under 14 and four sodomy offences.
The man, who cannot be identified under Queensland law, has been charged with one count of indecent assault against the other 14-year-old boy.
He has also been charged with one count each of indecent assault on a female in relation to both 16-year-old girls.
He will appear in the Brisbane Magistrates Court today
Re: Former cricket umpire on child sex charges
Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:15 pmby Aerie
dinglinga wrote:A FORMER international cricket umpire will face court in Brisbane today on 12 child sex charges.
The man is alleged to have indecently assaulted the four complainants on different occasions between 1974 and 1998.
The offences against the two 14-year-old males are alleged to have occurred in 1974 and the two 16-year-old females in 1983 and 1998.
In relation to one 14-year-old, the man has been charged with five counts of indecent assault on a male under 14 and four sodomy offences.
The man, who cannot be identified under Queensland law, has been charged with one count of indecent assault against the other 14-year-old boy.
He has also been charged with one count each of indecent assault on a female in relation to both 16-year-old girls.
He will appear in the Brisbane Magistrates Court today
Not another one... isn't the Inspector Gadget look a like umpire from Tassie currently serving time for being a paedophile?
Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 4:18 pmby dinglinga
yeah steve randell
and was at the time one of the better ones ( umpires that is)
Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:37 pmby Ecky
If you do a few searches on cricinfo, it is not very hard to work out who this one is, even though his name has been supressed...
Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:54 pmby heater31
Ecky wrote:If you do a few searches on cricinfo, it is not very hard to work out who this one is, even though his name has been supressed...
looks like channel 7 are going to be in the shite as they named him in their broadcast. or is it only suppressed in national news services to protect the Qld people much like how SA didnt get any info on the Snowtown case
Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 9:45 pmby mal
End of a GLITTERing career I would suggest.
Posted:
Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:13 pmby Adelaide Hawk
Ecky wrote:If you do a few searches on cricinfo, it is not very hard to work out who this one is, even though his name has been supressed...
you're better at searches than I am Ecky, I can't come up with the answer
Posted:
Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:19 amby Ecky
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Ecky wrote:If you do a few searches on cricinfo, it is not very hard to work out who this one is, even though his name has been supressed...
you're better at searches than I am Ecky, I can't come up with the answer
Clue: He was the umpire at the other end when Murali was called for throwing in that one-day game at Adelaide Oval.
Posted:
Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:31 amby Squawk
mal wrote:End of a GLITTERing career I would suggest.
If he gets binned it might be the START of a GLITTERing career MAL! 8.2!
Obviously a MALadjustment is required to ensure his GLITTERing career doesn't take off.
Posted:
Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:21 pmby dinglinga
if u read todays advertiser the umpire in question name was released