SA Footy

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:35 pm**

That is, except Australia lost.

(Australia vs India, 2nd Test, Adelaide Oval 2003-04)
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2003 ... C2003.html

-Both sides made 500+ in their first innings
-Both losing sides had someone who made 200+
-Ricky Ponting was the top Australian scorer in both 1st innings

I was thinking to myself it was probably best I didn't go today, as I went to the 4th day of that India Test - the day Australia fell in a heap, though not quite to the extent England did in just one day.

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:39 pm**

spell_check wrote:That is, except Australia lost.

(Australia vs India, 2nd Test, Adelaide Oval 2003-04)
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2003 ... C2003.html

-Both sides made 500+ in their first innings
-Both losing sides had someone who made 200+
-Ricky Ponting was the top Australian scorer in both 1st innings
-The winning margin was 4 wickets

I was thinking to myself it was probably best I didn't go today, as I went to the 4th day of that India Test - the day Australia fell in a heap, though not quite to the extent England did in just one day.

The winning margin today was 6 wickets

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:49 pm**

rod_rooster wrote:
spell_check wrote:That is, except Australia lost.

(Australia vs India, 2nd Test, Adelaide Oval 2003-04)
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2003 ... C2003.html

-Both sides made 500+ in their first innings
-Both losing sides had someone who made 200+
-Ricky Ponting was the top Australian scorer in both 1st innings
-The winning margin was 4 wickets

I was thinking to myself it was probably best I didn't go today, as I went to the 4th day of that India Test - the day Australia fell in a heap, though not quite to the extent England did in just one day.

The winning margin today was 6 wickets

Damn, now you've quoted it... :oops:

Thanks, I was thinking 4 wickets down; 4 wickets left and getting them mixed up. :wink:

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:51 pm**

You need someone who can edit ....

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:54 pm**

Dissident wrote:You need someone who can edit ....

You are an admin person; I know you know that.... :wink:

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:54 pm**

spell_check wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
spell_check wrote:That is, except Australia lost.

(Australia vs India, 2nd Test, Adelaide Oval 2003-04)
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2003 ... C2003.html

-Both sides made 500+ in their first innings
-Both losing sides had someone who made 200+
-Ricky Ponting was the top Australian scorer in both 1st innings
-The winning margin was 4 wickets

I was thinking to myself it was probably best I didn't go today, as I went to the 4th day of that India Test - the day Australia fell in a heap, though not quite to the extent England did in just one day.

The winning margin today was 6 wickets

Damn, now you've quoted it...

Thanks, I was thinking 4 wickets down; 4 wickets left and getting them mixed up.

Lol, finally spell_check makes an error. He is human after all

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:56 pm**

rod_rooster wrote:
spell_check wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
spell_check wrote:That is, except Australia lost.

(Australia vs India, 2nd Test, Adelaide Oval 2003-04)
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2003 ... C2003.html

-Both sides made 500+ in their first innings
-Both losing sides had someone who made 200+
-Ricky Ponting was the top Australian scorer in both 1st innings
-The winning margin was 4 wickets

I was thinking to myself it was probably best I didn't go today, as I went to the 4th day of that India Test - the day Australia fell in a heap, though not quite to the extent England did in just one day.

The winning margin today was 6 wickets

Damn, now you've quoted it...

Lol, finally spell_check makes an error. He is human after all

Thanks, I was thinking 4 wickets down; 4 wickets left and getting them mixed up.

Finally spell_check makes an error. He is human after all

Human?
When he came around and I asked him if he wanted a drink, he just turned and asked for a powerpoint to plug himself in to ..

Posted: **Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:32 pm**

Dissident wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
spell_check wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
spell_check wrote:That is, except Australia lost.

(Australia vs India, 2nd Test, Adelaide Oval 2003-04)
http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2003 ... C2003.html

-Both sides made 500+ in their first innings
-Both losing sides had someone who made 200+
-Ricky Ponting was the top Australian scorer in both 1st innings
-The winning margin was 4 wickets

I was thinking to myself it was probably best I didn't go today, as I went to the 4th day of that India Test - the day Australia fell in a heap, though not quite to the extent England did in just one day.

The winning margin today was 6 wickets

Damn, now you've quoted it...

Lol, finally spell_check makes an error. He is human after all

Thanks, I was thinking 4 wickets down; 4 wickets left and getting them mixed up.

Finally spell_check makes an error. He is human after all

Human?
When he came around and I asked him if he wanted a drink, he just turned and asked for a powerpoint to plug himself in to ..

lol, yeah sounds a bit like me. :wink:

P.S. No * intended. :wink:

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:20 pm**

Even though the Aussies lost, that was one of the finest test matches in one of the best series that Indian test.

SA Footy

Todays result identical to the Adelaide Test three years ago

Todays result identical to the Adelaide Test three years ago

Re: Todays result identical to the Adelaide Test three years

Re: Todays result identical to the Adelaide Test three years

Re: Todays result identical to the Adelaide Test three years

Re: Todays result identical to the Adelaide Test three years

Re: Todays result identical to the Adelaide Test three years