by Tiger Couple » Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:11 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:34 am
by mal » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:23 pm
by rod_rooster » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:37 pm
by mal » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:58 pm
by stan » Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:01 pm
mal wrote:Why not bat CULLEN at 3 instead of ELLIOTT
Same runs, better bowler, better fielder...
by stan » Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:04 pm
by mal » Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:07 pm
stan wrote:Should also note that Plant and Borgas put on 43 for the first wicket. Is that a record the redbacks this season?
by Stumps » Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:19 am
by mal » Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:21 pm
Stumps wrote:If he couldnt make any at 4 he wasnt gonna make any opening IMHO- Older ball= easier job against a purely pace attack
by Stumps » Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:21 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:26 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:44 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:im thinking we F**K THE coaches off and ELLIOTT and keep the same players but introduce new coaches and see how we go next year.
the players performance hasnt been up to scratch but i also think that the selectors have made so many blunders this season its ridiculous and heads should roll..........
by mal » Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:33 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:im thinking we F**K THE coaches off and ELLIOTT and keep the same players but introduce new coaches and see how we go next year.
the players performance hasnt been up to scratch but i also think that the selectors have made so many blunders this season its ridiculous and heads should roll..........
What "blunders" have the selectors made?
by scoob » Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:43 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:12 pm
scoob wrote:I posted sack flipper, not long ago and was shot down pretty quickly saying it wasnt his fault, the players are to blame??? if a side is underperforming the buck has to stop somewhere, why are the players underperforming? because there is something obviously wrong in the set up, who manages all this, the selectors and coach...simple...f@#k em off
by JK » Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:20 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:scoob wrote:I posted sack flipper, not long ago and was shot down pretty quickly saying it wasnt his fault, the players are to blame??? if a side is underperforming the buck has to stop somewhere, why are the players underperforming? because there is something obviously wrong in the set up, who manages all this, the selectors and coach...simple...f@#k em off
And at what stage are the players accountable? Coaches and selectors can't go out in the middle and make runs for them. Sacking the coach is a football thing because it's easier to sack one person than 20. I'd hate to see that enter into cricket. There's far more to coaching than win/loss ratios.
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:21 pm
mal wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:What "blunders" have the selectors made?
Come on AH what errors have a look at the player MT79 has put
up in capitals in his post. starst with E
Pick only 2 quicks v VI on a seaming pitch at Adelaide oval selected
The apparent mishandling of Blewett.
The non selection of Cleary is baffling
Selecting a grossly overweight cricketer
The retenion of a wicketkeeper who has been underpeforming for so long
Dropping Ferguson who as a batting average far superior to a 35 yo has been.
I dont know who tinkers with the batting order but players have been unsettled by it
Just a few
MT79 is advocating a new coach.....todays advertiser report vindicates his judgement.
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:25 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:scoob wrote:I posted sack flipper, not long ago and was shot down pretty quickly saying it wasnt his fault, the players are to blame??? if a side is underperforming the buck has to stop somewhere, why are the players underperforming? because there is something obviously wrong in the set up, who manages all this, the selectors and coach...simple...f@#k em off
And at what stage are the players accountable? Coaches and selectors can't go out in the middle and make runs for them. Sacking the coach is a football thing because it's easier to sack one person than 20. I'd hate to see that enter into cricket. There's far more to coaching than win/loss ratios.
Hear what ur saying AH, but rightly or wrongly, once you hit elite levels there aint too much more important than W/L Ratio's and Silverware
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:32 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |