Page 1 of 3

2nd Final in Sydney

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:34 pm
by heater31
Aussie are going to loose F*KING WATSON IS STILL IN THE SIDE !!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:46 pm
by Thiele
After England are 1/49 after 13.2 overs looks like rain is on the way
England won the toss and batting

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:54 pm
by noone
i think its going to be a no result

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:55 pm
by Thiele
At the the start of the 15th over they go of for rain

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:02 pm
by rod_rooster
Watson 1 over no maidens no wicket for 9 :roll:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:42 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
rod_rooster wrote:Watson 1 over no maidens no wicket for 9 :roll:


Correction .. 2 overs for 16.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:43 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
wheres MAL, wasnt WATSON one his love-children :?:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:45 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
RAIN!!!! 1/79 182 overs.
So, if this is a draw, does England win, or do they still play the match in Adelaide? And if it's 1-1 after Adelaide, what happens then?

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:49 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
Adelaide Hawk wrote:RAIN!!!! 1/79 182 overs.
So, if this is a draw, does England win, or do they still play the match in Adelaide? And if it's 1-1 after Adelaide, what happens then?


its either extra time or net run rate

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:12 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
Strauss ... unlucky AGAIN!!! :) 3/87

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 4:25 pm
by another grub
arent the aussies weak.... im ashamed !!!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:05 pm
by mal
It rained and 1st ball after the rain MAL Loye was run out.
The pressure of facing WATSON got to him. :wink:

4/148 [32]
COLLINGWOOD CHRIST still there.

PONTING WAKE UP MUST HAVE A SQUARE LEG FOR COLLINGWOOD :!:
Im sick of him pushing the ball there and getting too MANY cheap runs.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:19 pm
by SOTTERS
Watson back into the attack. Important spell coming up.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 5:50 pm
by mal
At last
It took all summer
at 41.2 overs COLLINGWOOD gets to 50
AND THEN PONTING PUTS IN A SQUARE LEG :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea:
41.3 drops ball at feet NO RUN
41.4 clips to square leg NO SINGLE
41.5 turns to square leg NO SINGLE AGAIN :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
41-6 sweeps top edge ..........

Is it too late now :?:

4/208 [42.3]
COLLINGWOOD an allrounder that everyone seems to hate in o/d cricket 51*

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:24 pm
by Thiele
Australia needs 247 to win :)

England after overs 50 8/246 McGrath takes a wicket of his final bowl in sydney

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:25 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
The momentum swings in one delivery. McGrath gets a wicket with his final ball and the Aussies are UP!!! Nixon would have been better off patting the ball away for a single. 8/246

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:34 pm
by sydney-dog
competitve score by the POM's

Aussies 1-0 down in the series, chasing 247 to win under lights to stay alive

the boys will have to Bat well

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:45 pm
by mal
Adelaide Hawk wrote:The momentum swings in one delivery. McGrath gets a wicket with his final ball and the Aussies are UP!!! Nixon would have been better off patting the ball away for a single. 8/246


This is what you posted after the first final #-o
MCGRATH HAS TO GO
WASHED UP FORMER GREAT
SELECTORS NEED TO HAVE A LOOK AT THEMSELVES.

You picked on the leading wicket taker in the series [how can he be finished :oops: ]
YOU PICKED ON A CHAMPION [not too clever]
You embarrased yourself.[ we both do that :wink: ]

GLEN MCCHAMPRATH 10 OVERS 2/42 + WICKET LAST BALL :prayer: :prayer: :prayer:


Did we all see the way COLLINGWOOD batted when we put in a square leg
Yes he had to play a reverse sweep of BRACKEN and get out :!:

WATSON bowled shit, even though he had FLINTOFF plumb LBW given not out :roll:

8/246 not enough

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:21 pm
by bayman
mal wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:The momentum swings in one delivery. McGrath gets a wicket with his final ball and the Aussies are UP!!! Nixon would have been better off patting the ball away for a single. 8/246


This is what you posted after the first final #-o
MCGRATH HAS TO GO
WASHED UP FORMER GREAT
SELECTORS NEED TO HAVE A LOOK AT THEMSELVES.

You picked on the leading wicket taker in the series [how can he be finished :oops: ]
YOU PICKED ON A CHAMPION [not too clever]
You embarrased yourself.[ we both do that :wink: ]

GLEN MCCHAMPRATH 10 OVERS 2/42 + WICKET LAST BALL :prayer: :prayer: :prayer:


Did we all see the way COLLINGWOOD batted when we put in a square leg
Yes he had to play a reverse sweep of BRACKEN and get out :!:

WATSON bowled shit, even though he had FLINTOFF plumb LBW given not out :roll:

8/246 not enough


just observing the banter about ooh aah i think mal (i hate to say this) is correct the leading wicket taker in the series at an aceptable average & you want to drop him :? :? :? if form wasn't good enough he would've been dropped ( ask jason gillespie & he got dropped after scoring a double ton)

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:29 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
mal wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:The momentum swings in one delivery. McGrath gets a wicket with his final ball and the Aussies are UP!!! Nixon would have been better off patting the ball away for a single. 8/246


This is what you posted after the first final #-o
MCGRATH HAS TO GO
WASHED UP FORMER GREAT
SELECTORS NEED TO HAVE A LOOK AT THEMSELVES.



I still believe it. He offers nothing with bat and in the field, and unless he takes a few poles for very few runs he isn't worth a lot to the team. I'd have no problem with him continuing im the Test team, but as a one day player I think we can do better.