Rebecca Wilson throws her 10c in on Shane Watson

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Rebecca Wilson throws her 10c in on Shane Watson

Postby Punk Rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:20 pm

I know Mal popped a few blood vessels when he read her token-journalism, & was last muttering unspeakable acts toward her.
Anyone else read the tripe & wish to debate it/sledge her?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby Brad » Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:24 pm

I can't believe she still gets that spot in each Saturday's paper, she talks absolute crap and has no idea at all. I read G Cornes column rather than hers, and Im not his biggest fan either!
Brad
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: Ceduna
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Crystal Brook

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:33 pm

NorMALly i don't even consider reading anything she writes but a moment of madness had me read her column on Saturday. Lets just pretend i was really hungover and didn't realise what i was doing :oops: :oops:

I considered mentioning it on here but using her opinion would only harm my argument not better it. The best quote from the whole article was this:

"The bowlers are rubbish. Nathan Bracken lacks hunger and plays like a club cricketer in bad need of a decent haircut."

My oath he needs a decent haircut. Looks more like a woman than Amelie Mauresmo not that it would be difficult.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby am Bays » Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:51 pm

Christ if ever a women reinforces the sterotype that women should be seen at sporting events and not heard she is it. The biggest sledge I can give her is that she makes Rucci look good.

I know the Roost is in meltdown at the minute over the Rucci "article" on Robran....it is a sobering thought she is worse than him IMHO.....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19775
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Postby RoosterMarty » Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:51 pm

Bracken's wife is a hairdresser isn't she? That makes his 'do' even more bizarre.
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:02 pm

RoosterMarty wrote:Bracken's wife is a hairdresser isn't she? That makes his 'do' even more bizarre.


Oh dear. You are having a lend of us aren't you? If that is true how the hell does she get a job?

Imagine going to the hairdressers and asking for the Nathan Bracken :lol: :lol:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby Punk Rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:04 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
RoosterMarty wrote:Bracken's wife is a hairdresser isn't she? That makes his 'do' even more bizarre.


Oh dear. You are having a lend of us aren't you? If that is true how the hell does she get a job?

Imagine going to the hairdressers and asking for the Nathan Bracken :lol: :lol:
I'd rather Bracken's hair than his shoulders...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:06 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Christ if ever a women reinforces the sterotype that women should be seen at sporting events and not heard she is it. The biggest sledge I can give her is that she makes Rucci look good.

I know the Roost is in meltdown at the minute over the Rucci "article" on Robran....it is a sobering thought she is worse than him IMHO.....


Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:

Not sure about the Wilson, Rucci argument. The only thing i can say is that not even Port supporters take Wilson seriously so i guess you're right. :lol:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby mal » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:07 pm

Rebecca Wilson on Nathan Bracken

" Nathan Bracken lacks hunger and plays like a club cricketer in
bad need of a haircut."

Just picked on one of the most productive one day bowlers Australia has owned.
Im sure his bunnys SHEWAG and LARA would disagree with the Miss stupid.

" Bracken bowled the last over on Tuesday night, with the Kiwis needing nine runs to win
He allowed the batsman score a six and a four of the first 2 balls of the over."

Well Miss stupid needs to report the truth not lies
NZ needed 7 to win off the last over not 9
BRACKEN finished with 1/43 off 9.3 overs [I thought he bowled 3 balls not 2 ???}
Yeah 43 runs on a Primary school ground is a good effort Miss stupid

Then this one :

" Five Australian bowlers-Johnson,Bracken,Watson,Hogg,and Tait- could not
earn a game in an Ashes Test Match "

Well Miss Stupid we are talking about the one day team not a test team.

" I could play Shane Watson and score runs."

A stupid statement by Miss Stupid.

" Watson is an over-rated cricketer whose selection bamboozles many punters
who have watched him on the fringes of Australian teams for many seasons"

I will leave that one to three impartial safooty posters ROD ROOSTER PUNK AND SYD-DOG.
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:14 pm

I refuse to comment any further on what Rebecca Wilson writes mal. I don't think it fair to bring her drivel into any argument. To even pay her lip service is irritating me at this point. As you pointed out she couldn't even get the facts right so why should we bother with this any further.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:17 pm

Actually having said all that no one could argue with the "in bad need of a decent haircut" comment directed at Bracken. Hooray, she's got something right :lol:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby am Bays » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:27 pm

rod_rooster wrote:Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:



Just using some "journalistic license" if its good enough for them its good enough for me :wink: :wink: :wink:

Mind you if anything un-toward ever happened to Rucci in the next few weeks (god forbid :shock: :shock: ) I would suggest that the authorities look no further than the Roost for evidence to prove the "motive" side of the case, just need to find evidence of "opportunity" and "means"....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19775
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Postby Punk Rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:38 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:



Just using some "journalistic license" if its good enough for them its good enough for me :wink: :wink: :wink:

Mind you if anything un-toward ever happened to Rucci in the next few weeks (god forbid :shock: :shock: ) I would suggest that the authorities look no further than the Roost for evidence to prove the "motive" side of the case, just need to find evidence of "opportunity" and "means"....
well, if his house burnt to the ground, who would they look at??? :-k
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby rod_rooster » Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:46 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:



Just using some "journalistic license" if its good enough for them its good enough for me :wink: :wink: :wink:

Mind you if anything un-toward ever happened to Rucci in the next few weeks (god forbid :shock: :shock: ) I would suggest that the authorities look no further than the Roost for evidence to prove the "motive" side of the case, just need to find evidence of "opportunity" and "means"....
well, if his house burnt to the ground, who would they look at??? :-k


Only his house in Italy :wink:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:20 am

I never read any of these "jounalists" columns, so they don't bother me. I used to see that Rebecca Wilson bimbo on some show on ABC2 and often wondered to whom she was giving blow jobs in order to be on that show. Her poverty in sporting knowledge is exceded only by her lack of aesthetic appeal. She's a shocker.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby - » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:05 am

Could someone post the article
Never give a sucker an even break

Nor ban a user for an acceptable topic of discussion.

"Baby on board". Why dont you put a sign on ur car saying "adult on board" or "car stereo in use"?
-
Reserves
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:12 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Blue Boy » Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:12 am

Read 1 of her articles once and thought what are you goin on about !!!

So have and always will just flip straight past any article that is written by her.
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Postby Dogwatcher » Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:21 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:I never read any of these "jounalists" columns, so they don't bother me. I used to see that Rebecca Wilson bimbo on some show on ABC2 and often wondered to whom she was giving blow jobs in order to be on that show. Her poverty in sporting knowledge is exceded only by her lack of aesthetic appeal. She's a shocker.


AH - she don't need to give blowies. Her father was a very widely respected journalist. Covered many, many Olympics. So, BJs no - nepotism yes.

Maybe her mum should've given head though, then we wouldn't be subjected to her work.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Postby rod_rooster » Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:46 am

Dogwatcher wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:I never read any of these "jounalists" columns, so they don't bother me. I used to see that Rebecca Wilson bimbo on some show on ABC2 and often wondered to whom she was giving blow jobs in order to be on that show. Her poverty in sporting knowledge is exceded only by her lack of aesthetic appeal. She's a shocker.


AH - she don't need to give blowies. Her father was a very widely respected journalist. Covered many, many Olympics. So, BJs no - nepotism yes.

Maybe her mum should've given head though, then we wouldn't be subjected to her work.


Yes, definitely something her mother should've swallowed. And while we're on the subject you'd have to be pretty desperate to let Rebecca Wilson anywhere near that area.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Postby MightyEagles » Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:48 am

Don't read her articles myself.
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Next

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |