Page 1 of 3

Rebecca Wilson throws her 10c in on Shane Watson

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:20 pm
by Punk Rooster
I know Mal popped a few blood vessels when he read her token-journalism, & was last muttering unspeakable acts toward her.
Anyone else read the tripe & wish to debate it/sledge her?

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:24 pm
by Brad
I can't believe she still gets that spot in each Saturday's paper, she talks absolute crap and has no idea at all. I read G Cornes column rather than hers, and Im not his biggest fan either!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:33 pm
by rod_rooster
NorMALly i don't even consider reading anything she writes but a moment of madness had me read her column on Saturday. Lets just pretend i was really hungover and didn't realise what i was doing :oops: :oops:

I considered mentioning it on here but using her opinion would only harm my argument not better it. The best quote from the whole article was this:

"The bowlers are rubbish. Nathan Bracken lacks hunger and plays like a club cricketer in bad need of a decent haircut."

My oath he needs a decent haircut. Looks more like a woman than Amelie Mauresmo not that it would be difficult.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:51 pm
by am Bays
Christ if ever a women reinforces the sterotype that women should be seen at sporting events and not heard she is it. The biggest sledge I can give her is that she makes Rucci look good.

I know the Roost is in meltdown at the minute over the Rucci "article" on Robran....it is a sobering thought she is worse than him IMHO.....

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:51 pm
by RoosterMarty
Bracken's wife is a hairdresser isn't she? That makes his 'do' even more bizarre.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:02 pm
by rod_rooster
RoosterMarty wrote:Bracken's wife is a hairdresser isn't she? That makes his 'do' even more bizarre.


Oh dear. You are having a lend of us aren't you? If that is true how the hell does she get a job?

Imagine going to the hairdressers and asking for the Nathan Bracken :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:04 pm
by Punk Rooster
rod_rooster wrote:
RoosterMarty wrote:Bracken's wife is a hairdresser isn't she? That makes his 'do' even more bizarre.


Oh dear. You are having a lend of us aren't you? If that is true how the hell does she get a job?

Imagine going to the hairdressers and asking for the Nathan Bracken :lol: :lol:
I'd rather Bracken's hair than his shoulders...

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:06 pm
by rod_rooster
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Christ if ever a women reinforces the sterotype that women should be seen at sporting events and not heard she is it. The biggest sledge I can give her is that she makes Rucci look good.

I know the Roost is in meltdown at the minute over the Rucci "article" on Robran....it is a sobering thought she is worse than him IMHO.....


Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:

Not sure about the Wilson, Rucci argument. The only thing i can say is that not even Port supporters take Wilson seriously so i guess you're right. :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:07 pm
by mal
Rebecca Wilson on Nathan Bracken

" Nathan Bracken lacks hunger and plays like a club cricketer in
bad need of a haircut."

Just picked on one of the most productive one day bowlers Australia has owned.
Im sure his bunnys SHEWAG and LARA would disagree with the Miss stupid.

" Bracken bowled the last over on Tuesday night, with the Kiwis needing nine runs to win
He allowed the batsman score a six and a four of the first 2 balls of the over."

Well Miss stupid needs to report the truth not lies
NZ needed 7 to win off the last over not 9
BRACKEN finished with 1/43 off 9.3 overs [I thought he bowled 3 balls not 2 ???}
Yeah 43 runs on a Primary school ground is a good effort Miss stupid

Then this one :

" Five Australian bowlers-Johnson,Bracken,Watson,Hogg,and Tait- could not
earn a game in an Ashes Test Match "

Well Miss Stupid we are talking about the one day team not a test team.

" I could play Shane Watson and score runs."

A stupid statement by Miss Stupid.

" Watson is an over-rated cricketer whose selection bamboozles many punters
who have watched him on the fringes of Australian teams for many seasons"

I will leave that one to three impartial safooty posters ROD ROOSTER PUNK AND SYD-DOG.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:14 pm
by rod_rooster
I refuse to comment any further on what Rebecca Wilson writes mal. I don't think it fair to bring her drivel into any argument. To even pay her lip service is irritating me at this point. As you pointed out she couldn't even get the facts right so why should we bother with this any further.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:17 pm
by rod_rooster
Actually having said all that no one could argue with the "in bad need of a decent haircut" comment directed at Bracken. Hooray, she's got something right :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:27 pm
by am Bays
rod_rooster wrote:Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:



Just using some "journalistic license" if its good enough for them its good enough for me :wink: :wink: :wink:

Mind you if anything un-toward ever happened to Rucci in the next few weeks (god forbid :shock: :shock: ) I would suggest that the authorities look no further than the Roost for evidence to prove the "motive" side of the case, just need to find evidence of "opportunity" and "means"....

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:38 pm
by Punk Rooster
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:



Just using some "journalistic license" if its good enough for them its good enough for me :wink: :wink: :wink:

Mind you if anything un-toward ever happened to Rucci in the next few weeks (god forbid :shock: :shock: ) I would suggest that the authorities look no further than the Roost for evidence to prove the "motive" side of the case, just need to find evidence of "opportunity" and "means"....
well, if his house burnt to the ground, who would they look at??? :-k

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:46 pm
by rod_rooster
Punk Rooster wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:Hardly in meltdown Tassie. Christ you're not one to over exaggerate are you :lol: :wink:



Just using some "journalistic license" if its good enough for them its good enough for me :wink: :wink: :wink:

Mind you if anything un-toward ever happened to Rucci in the next few weeks (god forbid :shock: :shock: ) I would suggest that the authorities look no further than the Roost for evidence to prove the "motive" side of the case, just need to find evidence of "opportunity" and "means"....
well, if his house burnt to the ground, who would they look at??? :-k


Only his house in Italy :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:20 am
by Adelaide Hawk
I never read any of these "jounalists" columns, so they don't bother me. I used to see that Rebecca Wilson bimbo on some show on ABC2 and often wondered to whom she was giving blow jobs in order to be on that show. Her poverty in sporting knowledge is exceded only by her lack of aesthetic appeal. She's a shocker.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:05 am
by -
Could someone post the article

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:12 am
by Blue Boy
Read 1 of her articles once and thought what are you goin on about !!!

So have and always will just flip straight past any article that is written by her.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:21 am
by Dogwatcher
Adelaide Hawk wrote:I never read any of these "jounalists" columns, so they don't bother me. I used to see that Rebecca Wilson bimbo on some show on ABC2 and often wondered to whom she was giving blow jobs in order to be on that show. Her poverty in sporting knowledge is exceded only by her lack of aesthetic appeal. She's a shocker.


AH - she don't need to give blowies. Her father was a very widely respected journalist. Covered many, many Olympics. So, BJs no - nepotism yes.

Maybe her mum should've given head though, then we wouldn't be subjected to her work.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:46 am
by rod_rooster
Dogwatcher wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:I never read any of these "jounalists" columns, so they don't bother me. I used to see that Rebecca Wilson bimbo on some show on ABC2 and often wondered to whom she was giving blow jobs in order to be on that show. Her poverty in sporting knowledge is exceded only by her lack of aesthetic appeal. She's a shocker.


AH - she don't need to give blowies. Her father was a very widely respected journalist. Covered many, many Olympics. So, BJs no - nepotism yes.

Maybe her mum should've given head though, then we wouldn't be subjected to her work.


Yes, definitely something her mother should've swallowed. And while we're on the subject you'd have to be pretty desperate to let Rebecca Wilson anywhere near that area.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:48 am
by MightyEagles
Don't read her articles myself.