rod_rooster wrote:mal wrote:ROY is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack
Press releases say that he will play for AU v SOUTH AFRICA
BUT the JOY OF ROY means someone must get dropped
Question is who
The press say last game centurion Brad HODGE might be dropped.
Who should be dropped

[I am "hamstrung"]
Hodge will be dropped but shouldn't be. He should be one of the first picked. I am certainly not his biggest fan and i have been quite crictical of his in the past but he has taken every opportunity afforded him of late. It will be very dissapointing when he is dropped. Roy must come back in but at the expense of someone other than Hodge.
Sorry mal but Hodge is more valuable to the team than your love child Watto. He bats better (you can't argue with that), fields better (doubt you would argue with that) and on the Carribean wickets Watson is not likely to get a bowl being a 4th quick. Much more likely to have Symonds, Hogg, Clarke and if picked perhaps even Hodge bowl the other 20 overs.
I guess I was asking for trouble putting this post up.
Maybe WATTO will pull a BUCKLEY and make it easier for all
HODGE 200 in a test and dropped soon after
HODGE 130 last game .....
A case of NON HODGEINS disease
______________________________________________________
If HODGE is dropped and WATTO retained even I would be upset
______________________________________________________
MARCH 20 2007