Aus vs Ban
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:27 pmAustralia should beat them easy tonight
Thiele wrote:Australia should beat them easy tonight
A brave prediction, but gotta admit I agree with you, I think the Aussies can win
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:27 pmRe: Aus vs Ban
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:04 pmA brave prediction, but gotta admit I agree with you, I think the Aussies can win
Re: Aus vs Ban
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:25 pmmal wrote:Thiele wrote:Australia should beat them easy tonight
A brave prediction, but gotta admit I agree with you, I think the Aussies can win
What odds Symonds has been on it last night.....
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:01 amLooks it been raining No play until early hours of the morning 
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:46 amTwo Aussie game on FTA and both impacted by rain. Great to watch the old games though. How times have changed -
A few observations from the Aussie v Pakistan 92 WC match
- S Waugh had one of the best slower balls
- You would never get away with an opener like Marsh (S/rate well under 50 for 91 balls)
- What a fielder was Deano
- Pakistan always are in the middle of controversy (disputed c behind against Whitney)
- The third umpire is a great idea (Inzamam was at the stumps and given out)
- Inzamam wasnt always a fat bastard
- The WACA is a big ground when you dont put ropes half way to the fence like today
A few observations from the Aussie v Pakistan 92 WC match
- S Waugh had one of the best slower balls
- You would never get away with an opener like Marsh (S/rate well under 50 for 91 balls)
- What a fielder was Deano
- Pakistan always are in the middle of controversy (disputed c behind against Whitney)
- The third umpire is a great idea (Inzamam was at the stumps and given out)
- Inzamam wasnt always a fat bastard
- The WACA is a big ground when you dont put ropes half way to the fence like today
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:59 aminzy is know a shadow for his younger self 
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:56 amgame about to start at last
22 overs per side
Aust won toss and elected to field.
22 overs per side
Aust won toss and elected to field.
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:12 amTaity strikes. Bang 5/65 (16.2 overs)
Aust will romp this one in.
Aust will romp this one in.
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:19 amJJ thanks for staying up all night and reporting on the game.
You must have a BITCH putting up with you
BA 6/104
MCGRATH 3/16 the person who said he was finished is now
WATSON O/4[1.4 OVERS]
AU 0/106
HAYDEN 47*[39]
gilCHRIST 50*[44]
WATSON did not bat[and still not dismissed in a world cup game]
Bangladesh found a way to stop AU get 300+ no other team has
You must have a BITCH putting up with you
BA 6/104
MCGRATH 3/16 the person who said he was finished is now
WATSON O/4[1.4 OVERS]
AU 0/106
HAYDEN 47*[39]
gilCHRIST 50*[44]
WATSON did not bat[and still not dismissed in a world cup game]
Bangladesh found a way to stop AU get 300+ no other team has
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:21 amShane Watson has Finshed in the World cup after being injured
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:17 ammal wrote:WATSON did not bat[and still not dismissed in a world cup game]
And won't be dismissed either. Looks like his World Cup is over after injuring his calf. Finally the selectors have to do away with their infatuation with him and actually pick the best side now. This will give Hodge his rightful place back.
Commiserations mal
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:41 amthank god watson is out....a total waste of time for the aussie selectors, now they will pick a guy with heart that wont get injured...hell, anyone but watto.... 
bout f***ing time!!!!!
bout f***ing time!!!!!
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:15 pmJimmy wrote:thank god watson is out....a total waste of time for the aussie selectors, now they will pick a guy with heart that wont get injured...hell, anyone but watto....
bout f***ing time!!!!!
what do you really think jimmy?
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:17 pmmal wrote: Bangladesh found a way to stop AU get 300+ no other team has
They didn't even manage that, Australia chose to bat second!