Page 1 of 1
20/20 REDBACKS v VICS

Posted:
Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:01 pm
by Rooster_cracker
Redbacks are batting and are 7 for 89 in the 15th over.


Posted:
Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:30 pm
by Rooster_cracker
The redback were bowled out in the 20th over for 113.
Vics first over are 0 for 12

SA Innings

Posted:
Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:58 pm
by Ian
SA Deitz b Harwood 34
MJ Cosgrove c Crosthwaite b Siddle 12
CJ Borgas b McDonald 2
CJ Ferguson b McDonald 2
DS Lehmann run out (Buchanan) 1
KJ Skewes st Crosthwaite b White 14
*+GA Manou b Harwood 0
MF Cleary b Moss 20
DJ Cullen c Siddle b White 7
SW Tait b Harwood 14
GD Putland not out 0
Extras (b 1, lb 1, w 5) 7
Total (all out, 19.2 overs) 113
FoW:
1-19 (Cosgrove, 3.3 ov)
2-30 (Borgas, 4.6 ov)
3-44 (Ferguson, 6.5 ov)
4-46 (Lehmann, 7.5 ov)
5-63 (Deitz, 11.2 ov)
6-63 (Manou, 11.3 ov)
6-63 (Skewes, 11.2 ov)
8-92 (Cleary, 15.1 ov)
9-110 (Cullen, 18.4 ov)
10-113 (Tait, 19.2 ov).
Bowling O M R W
Denton 2 0 12 0 (1w)
Siddle 4 0 19 1
McDonald 4 0 28 2 (1w)
Harwood 3.2 0 13 3 (2w)
White 4 0 32 2 (1w)
Moss 2 0 7 1
Vic Innings (after 7 overs)

Posted:
Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:03 pm
by Ian
Victoria 1st innings R M B 4 6
BJ Hodge b Putland 26
J Moss not out 12
LGL Buchanan not out 17
Extras (w 10) 10
Total (1 wicket, 7 overs) 65
Still to bat: *CL White, DJ Hussey, M Klinger, +AJ Crosthwaite, AB McDonald,
SM Harwood, GJ Denton, PM Siddle.
FoW: 1-38 (Hodge, 3.3 ov).
Bowling O M R W
Tait 2 0 18 0 (5w)
Putland 3 0 29 1 (5w)
Cleary 1 0 8 0
Lehmann 1 0 10 0

Posted:
Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:12 pm
by Rooster_cracker
The Vics have flogged us 2 for 114 of 12.1 overs.
We play on tuesday night V WA 6.30. at adelaide oval.

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 9:28 am
by MightyEagles
Hope we do better tomorrow night, anyone going? To be fair, we haven't played this type of match that much, only Lehmann and Cosgrove and Tait had some experience.

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:34 pm
by Dog_ger
Didn't it look like the Redbacks of old...! Hope we never see that again...! Scarey stuff...!

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 2:48 pm
by Booney
Dog_ger wrote:Didn't it look like the Redbacks of old...! Hope we never see that again...! Scarey stuff...!
How could it look like the Redbacks of old? The stupid fargen game has only just started to be played here.

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 4:38 pm
by scott
Booney wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Didn't it look like the Redbacks of old...! Hope we never see that again...! Scarey stuff...!
How could it look like the Redbacks of old? The stupid fargen game has only just started to be played here.
You know, low scores...?

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:37 pm
by spell_check
Don't worry, it's only 20/20.

Posted:
Mon Jan 09, 2006 9:30 pm
by scott
Well I guess that's what happens when you're new to the concept. I think a few of the South Australian players had played one Twenty20 game at grade level, while the rest were completely new to it. This is in comparison to most of the Victorian players, who regularly play Twenty20 at their grade level, and had two previous matches at state level.