ING, SA v TAS

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

ING, SA v TAS

Postby Ian » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:30 am

Went to the game today with my son, giffo and giffo jnr.
Bumped into Cracker and Tiger Boss during the rain delay.

SA made 5/160 in 35 overs, after a 2 hr rain delay mid innings.
Lehmann, n.o. 50 something.

Revised total (Duckworth/Lewis System) Tassie required 172 in 35 overs to win.

TAS scored a single of the last ball to be 8/171 from 35 overs, the match was a tie.
SA only has itself to blame, over 30 sundries in the total of 171 :x

We were discussing the Duckworth/Lewis System during the game, so I thought I would look it up so I understood it more clearly :? :? :?

http://home.iprimus.com.au/shane_booth/cricket/dlanalysis.html
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Postby Jman » Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:29 am

Not only were the sundries shocking SA last few overs of batting were pretty uninspiring, no urgency to score at all.
This result has almost killed our final chances as now NSW, Vic and WA are all ahead of us, with WA defeating Qld.
Melrose Park that aint South I'm talking about the real South.
User avatar
Jman
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: The Real South
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Ian » Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:28 am

When SA came back out to bat there seemed to be no urgency whatso ever, although perhaps they were a bit cautious with a damp wicket, and the ball skidding through. I did expect to see a flurry of shots in those final overs, but it wasn't to be.
If my memory is correct, there was only one 6 hit for the whole game, early in SA's innings, and that was to one of the longest boundrys, with those short side boundrys I expected to see a bit more big hitting.
User avatar
Ian
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 11443
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:25 pm
Has liked: 312 times
Been liked: 93 times
Grassroots Team: Lockleys

Postby RustyCage » Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:36 pm

There was no big hitting when we came back out to bat because when Boof checked the Duckworth/Lewis system he was told it was better to bat conservatively and not lose wickets. The match officials stuffed up with the D/L calculations which stuffed both SA and Tassy up, and Boof stormed into the match referees office and gave him a piece of his mind.

Saying that, it was a great game to watch, better than anything Twenty20 can ever be. Too many wides and poor fielding. Taits last over was brilliant.
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15304
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 938 times

Postby godoubleblues » Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:51 pm

Ian wrote:When SA came back out to bat there seemed to be no urgency whatso ever, although perhaps they were a bit cautious with a damp wicket, and the ball skidding through. I did expect to see a flurry of shots in those final overs, but it wasn't to be.
If my memory is correct, there was only one 6 hit for the whole game, early in SA's innings, and that was to one of the longest boundrys, with those short side boundrys I expected to see a bit more big hitting.


Greg Blewett hit the 6, nice shot too
User avatar
godoubleblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6063
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Littlehampton
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Millicent


Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |