by magpie in the 80's » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:25 pm
by Turkeywizz » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:30 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:39 pm
Turkeywizz wrote:4 167?
10 1101........INCORRECT
12 90
14 36
20 2100
by Turkeywizz » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:45 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:Turkeywizz wrote:4 167?
10 1101........INCORRECT
12 90
14 36
20 2100
ALL OTHERS CORRECT TW
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:46 pm
Turkeywizz wrote:magpie in the 80's wrote:Turkeywizz wrote:4 167?
10 1101........INCORRECT
12 90
14 36
20 2100
ALL OTHERS CORRECT TW
10 should be 210
by Turkeywizz » Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:55 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:59 pm
Turkeywizz wrote:2 57?..........INCORRECT
6 37.......CORRECT
by Pseudo » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:20 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:Turkeywizz wrote:2 57?..........INCORRECT
by Hondo » Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:40 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:59 pm
hondo71 wrote:9. Take a 3 by 3 square. The first row reads: 3, 5, 8. The second one: 4, 1, 7 and the last one: 14, 12, ?? Which number is missing? 30
11. 120, 60, 40, 30, 24, ... ? 20
13. Take a 3 by 3 square. The first row reads: 9, 1, 7. The second row: 8, 2, 4. The third row: 7, 3, ... ? 1
15. 4, 9, 25, 49, 121, 169, ...? 225INCORRECT
18. Take a 3 by 3 square. The first row reads: 1, 3, 10. The second: 2, 2, 8 and the third: 3, 1, ... ? 6
by Pseudo » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:15 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:hondo71 wrote:15. 4, 9, 25, 49, 121, 169, ...? 225INCORRECT
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Jul 08, 2008 11:50 pm
by Pseudo » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:25 am
magpie in the 80's wrote:after your last effort pseudo where are your answers. or you still getting fresh coffee
by magpie in the 80's » Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:51 am
Pseudo wrote:magpie in the 80's wrote:after your last effort pseudo where are your answers. or you still getting fresh coffee
Thought I'd let someone else have a go. Otherwise FC would call me a smartarse again
by Hondo » Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:38 pm
Pseudo wrote:magpie in the 80's wrote:hondo71 wrote:15. 4, 9, 25, 49, 121, 169, ...? 225INCORRECT
The square root of 225 isn't prime either
by magpie in the 80's » Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:47 pm
hondo71 wrote:Pseudo wrote:magpie in the 80's wrote:hondo71 wrote:15. 4, 9, 25, 49, 121, 169, ...? 225INCORRECT
The square root of 225 isn't prime either
Thanks for the tip![]()
Next number = 289
by Baron Greenback » Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:05 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:29 pm
Chuck Norris wrote:2. 47
by magpie in the 80's » Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:24 pm
by Pseudo » Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:25 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |