leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
LEFTPEG all I can say
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
by shoe boy » Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:42 pm
leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)

by leftpeg » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:14 pm
shoe boy wrote:leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
LEFTPEG all I can say
by shoe boy » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:09 am
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:33 pm
leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
by leftpeg » Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:23 pm
shoe boy wrote:No, they chose to do nothing!
When will they realise that the board are elected to represent the clubs! and not the interests of a minority.
The board put in place a FDC that had a difficult role but not withstanding put together a document that would not please all.
It would appear the board doesn't like the recommendations but as they say when you dig deep you might not like what you find!
I will finish with a quote! "Change is the law of life.And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future"

by shoe boy » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:54 am
Look Good In Leather wrote:leftpeg wrote:Does anyone know the outcome of the vote regarding whether or not the SFL will adopt the FDC recommendations?
I believe this vote took place at the SFL Committee meeting last night.
Vote deferred until June to allow the SFL board to meet with each club individually. Drags it out a bit, but now we at least have a date where hopefully we will get a decision one way or the other so our clubs can prepare accordingly.
by Tiger83 » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:58 am
by Waterboy » Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:26 am
Tiger83 wrote:For the un-intiated.. Whats the proposal we are discussing here?? Apologies if its been posted previously..
by cracka » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:30 pm
by leftpeg » Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:51 pm
cracka wrote:So nothing about going back to 2 divisions at all.
by tigerpie » Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:56 pm
by Keyser Soze » Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:00 pm
shoe boy wrote:No, they chose to do nothing!![]()
When will they realise that the board are elected to represent the clubs! and not the interests of a minority.
The board put in place a FDC that had a difficult role but not withstanding put together a document that would not please all.
It would appear the board doesn't like the recommendations but as they say when you dig deep you might not like what you find!
I will finish with a quote! "Change is the law of life.And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future"
by marbles » Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:02 pm
leftpeg wrote:cracka wrote:So nothing about going back to 2 divisions at all.
DEFINITELY NOT!! That would mean the FDC would actually have to address the problem for which they were created (trying to minimise the weekly 100+pt thrashings in Senior Grades).
by shoe boy » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:27 am
by Champ » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:28 pm
Waterboy wrote:Tiger83 wrote:For the un-intiated.. Whats the proposal we are discussing here?? Apologies if its been posted previously..
These are the Future Directions Committee recommendations that are to be voted on
FDC Recommendation 1
The Saturday match program should be restructured as follows:
• Junior Colts (currently U/16) should change to U/15.
• Senior Colts (currently U/18) should change to U/17.
• The Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be removed from the Saturday Program.
FDC Recommendation 2
• An optional third senior grade competition should be created and played in the current U/18 time slot.
• The U/15 and U/17 games should be played in the current U/14 and U/16 time slots.
FDC Recommendation 3
• The existing Saturday Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be moved to Sunday mornings and changed to U/13.
FDC Recommendation 4
• The Sunday overflow junior grade (currently U/14) should be changed to U/15 to re-align with the Saturday junior grades.
FDC Recommendation 5
• The Saturday grades A-Grade, B-Grade, U/17 and U/15 should be made compulsory to field in order to affiliate with the Southern Football League.
FDC Recommendation 6
• The Southern Football League should adopt a fixed timeline for implementation of the proposed changes.
by Waterboy » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:11 pm
Champ wrote:Waterboy wrote:Tiger83 wrote:For the un-intiated.. Whats the proposal we are discussing here?? Apologies if its been posted previously..
These are the Future Directions Committee recommendations that are to be voted on
FDC Recommendation 1
The Saturday match program should be restructured as follows:
• Junior Colts (currently U/16) should change to U/15.
• Senior Colts (currently U/18) should change to U/17.
• The Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be removed from the Saturday Program.
FDC Recommendation 2
• An optional third senior grade competition should be created and played in the current U/18 time slot.
• The U/15 and U/17 games should be played in the current U/14 and U/16 time slots.
FDC Recommendation 3
• The existing Saturday Sub-Junior Colts grade (currently U/14) should be moved to Sunday mornings and changed to U/13.
FDC Recommendation 4
• The Sunday overflow junior grade (currently U/14) should be changed to U/15 to re-align with the Saturday junior grades.
FDC Recommendation 5
• The Saturday grades A-Grade, B-Grade, U/17 and U/15 should be made compulsory to field in order to affiliate with the Southern Football League.
FDC Recommendation 6
• The Southern Football League should adopt a fixed timeline for implementation of the proposed changes.
What a farce! I thought everyone was dead behind the 'FDC' as it was finally going to point out the flaws in the current structure and more importantly suggestions to fix them?
Personally I dont understand why the need to move away from the SANFL under age categories - can someone give me an insight? Which clubs actually dont already fulfill 4 teams? Lonsdale?
by shoe boy » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:20 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:39 pm
by Keyser Soze » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:23 pm
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:Don't forget last season Brighton was initially unable to field a Saturday U16 side as well. So they would have only had 4/5 teams if the criteria was enforced last year
To enable their players to get club footy games, the SFL allowed both Brighton & Morphettville Park Sunday U16 teams to play against the Saturday program U16's teams, with those matches played on Sundays
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:42 am
Keyser Soze wrote:85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:Don't forget last season Brighton was initially unable to field a Saturday U16 side as well. So they would have only had 4/5 teams if the criteria was enforced last year
To enable their players to get club footy games, the SFL allowed both Brighton & Morphettville Park Sunday U16 teams to play against the Saturday program U16's teams, with those matches played on Sundays
Not sure they were struggling to field a side......they won the Premiership and other team lost prelim by a point in the under 16's. I do however agree it was a disgrace that SFL allowed them to field two sides in the saturday comp especially when others sides couldn't field one and some had to forfiet.
Football
Other Footy Leagues
SFL
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

