SA Footy

Luke15 wrote:

Front & Centre wrote:Are we about to see an old face return to the Valley?

Are you talking about Steve Wallace??

my mail has the following names linked only (i am not saying they have applied)

Steve Wallace
Ben Porter
Darren Spinks
Justin Calderbank
Adam Taylor (Current B grade coach)
Trevor Potts (highly unlikely)
Adam Jeffries

Or is there a name that is not on that list who might come back and show some brotherly love?
Would be good to see us move forward sometime soon and appointing new coach this week on the back of the big Marion win. Too many still looking for someone else to blame for the poor start to the season. Not ideal way to retain playing list.

Front & Centre wrote:Are we about to see an old face return to the Valley?

Are Happy Valley going to sack Taylor even after having the 2nd best coaching record for their club over the past 5 years?
2 sackings in 3 weeks

Luke15 wrote:Would this work

Division 1

Reynella
Flaggies
Morphett Vale
Noarlunga
Happy Valley
Brighton
Porties
Cove

Division 2

MParks
Edwardstown
Christies
Hackham
Aldinga
Marion
OSB

Explanation is that most of the Div 1 clubs have a full compliment of juniors plus are reasonably successful this year and.in the last 3 years.

Div 2 clubs well Morphy Parks, Edwardstown are stiff because they are going well in the As but in my.opinion they dont qualify for Div 1 unless they make more of an effort to get Saturday juniors. Christies do have a full compliment and good on Cratey and the club for building it up this well but i have them in Div 2 based on A grade performances especially this year.

Only 4 of your "Div 1" clubs have full juniors, so your reasoning for Morphy Park & Edwardstown being down conflicts with having CB down.

As for solving the problem of scores, these results would still occur:

Div 1
Reynella 14.12 (96) d Noarlunga 5.6 (36)
Reynella 24.14 (158) d Happy Valley 5.4 (34)
Port Noarlunga 18.8 (116) d Happy Valley 8.9 (57)
Reynella 31.21 (207) d Cove 6.8 (44)

Div 2
Morphettville Park 35.20 (230) d Lonsdale 9.10 (64)
Morphettville Park 13.14 (92) d Marion 5.11 (41)
Morphettville Park 21.20 (146) d Aldinga 3.8 (26)
Edwardstown 26.11 (167) d Hackham 10.11 (71)

But at least we would avoid the embarrassment of "Div 1" teams being beaten by "Div 2" teams like these:
Morphettville Park 12.15 (87) d Brighton 9.18 (72)
Christies Beach 7.12 (54) d Happy Valley 4.12 (36)

It's only 7 weeks in, it's not like we have Hamley Bridge, Kangarilla, Sedan Cambrai, Flinders University or North pines in our comp

Look Good In Leather wrote:

Front & Centre wrote:Are we about to see an old face return to the Valley?

Are Happy Valley going to sack Taylor even after having the 2nd best coaching record for their club over the past 5 years?
2 sackings in 3 weeks

Denis Ker would be a good option

Front & Centre wrote:

Luke15 wrote:

Front & Centre wrote:Are we about to see an old face return to the Valley?

Are you talking about Steve Wallace??

my mail has the following names linked only (i am not saying they have applied)

Steve Wallace
Ben Porter
Darren Spinks
Justin Calderbank
Adam Taylor (Current B grade coach)
Trevor Potts (highly unlikely)
Adam Jeffries

Or is there a name that is not on that list who might come back and show some brotherly love?
Would be good to see us move forward sometime soon and appointing new coach this week on the back of the big Marion win. Too many still looking for someone else to blame for the poor start to the season. Not ideal way to retain playing list.

Good play on words there F&C Reckon plenty of blokes love to have him back with some sibling support thrown in

Reckon Potts or Wallace will be the go with Potts the front runner in care taker mode. Chopper would be keen to get back to his B grade lads I reckon and see the back of this mess

Some interesting comments made during pressos on Saturday night

Interesting if Potts got the job, he would have to stop his current work with other clubs pretty quick.

Dutchy wrote:Interesting if Potts got the job, he would have to stop his current work with other clubs pretty quick.

Reckon he would be appointed in care taker role so club can go on proper hunt for right bloke.

Dunno how much work he is doing with other clubs?

Look Good In Leather wrote:

Luke15 wrote:Would this work

Division 1

Reynella
Flaggies
Morphett Vale
Noarlunga
Happy Valley
Brighton
Porties
Cove

Division 2

MParks
Edwardstown
Christies
Hackham
Aldinga
Marion
OSB

Explanation is that most of the Div 1 clubs have a full compliment of juniors plus are reasonably successful this year and.in the last 3 years.

Div 2 clubs well Morphy Parks, Edwardstown are stiff because they are going well in the As but in my.opinion they dont qualify for Div 1 unless they make more of an effort to get Saturday juniors. Christies do have a full compliment and good on Cratey and the club for building it up this well but i have them in Div 2 based on A grade performances especially this year.

Only 4 of your "Div 1" clubs have full juniors, so your reasoning for Morphy Park & Edwardstown being down conflicts with having CB down.

As for solving the problem of scores, these results would still occur:

Div 1
Reynella 14.12 (96) d Noarlunga 5.6 (36)
Reynella 24.14 (158) d Happy Valley 5.4 (34)
Port Noarlunga 18.8 (116) d Happy Valley 8.9 (57)
Reynella 31.21 (207) d Cove 6.8 (44)

Div 2
Morphettville Park 35.20 (230) d Lonsdale 9.10 (64)
Morphettville Park 13.14 (92) d Marion 5.11 (41)
Morphettville Park 21.20 (146) d Aldinga 3.8 (26)
Edwardstown 26.11 (167) d Hackham 10.11 (71)

But at least we would avoid the embarrassment of "Div 1" teams being beaten by "Div 2" teams like these:
Morphettville Park 12.15 (87) d Brighton 9.18 (72)
Christies Beach 7.12 (54) d Happy Valley 4.12 (36)

It's only 7 weeks in, it's not like we have Hamley Bridge, Kangarilla, Sedan Cambrai, Flinders University or North pines in our comp

Replace Valleys with Christies would that please you LGIL?

Attracting 3 more teams, have 10 teams in Div 1 & 8 in Div 2 would be better. Div 2 to have Under 13's 15's and 17's. Might be easier to fill a 17's than an 18's. or have a separate 18's comp.

Courtney Fish wrote:Replace Valleys with Christies would that please you LGIL?

That was not my point, we hear a lot about how we should split into 2 divisions, but nobody has come up with a model that will work.

The main motivator every time seems to be knee-jerk reactions to some one-sided games, but then a proposer will suggest that a club like Morphettville Park should play in the lower division because they do not have juniors - yet they have been one of the best performed teams so far this year.

I believe a division should be filled by the teams that can field a full set of teams and then one with the rest. Over time the score issues will sort themselves out as the juniors filter through.
Those clubs that don't field Saturday junior teams can either merge, fold or continue along happy with the odd Sunday team (or none at all) but at least they won't stuff up our junior competition/Saturday structure any further.

Look Good In Leather wrote:

Courtney Fish wrote:Replace Valleys with Christies would that please you LGIL?

That was not my point, we hear a lot about how we should split into 2 divisions, but nobody has come up with a model that will work.

The main motivator every time seems to be knee-jerk reactions to some one-sided games, but then a proposer will suggest that a club like Morphettville Park should play in the lower division because they do not have juniors - yet they have been one of the best performed teams so far this year.

I believe a division should be filled by the teams that can field a full set of teams and then one with the rest. Over time the score issues will sort themselves out as the juniors filter through.
Those clubs that don't field Saturday junior teams can either merge, fold or continue along happy with the odd Sunday team (or none at all) but at least they won't stuff up our junior competition/Saturday structure any further.

Boo hoo, can't have your cake and eat it too.

Roo Ted wrote:

Look Good In Leather wrote:

Courtney Fish wrote:Replace Valleys with Christies would that please you LGIL?

That was not my point, we hear a lot about how we should split into 2 divisions, but nobody has come up with a model that will work.

The main motivator every time seems to be knee-jerk reactions to some one-sided games, but then a proposer will suggest that a club like Morphettville Park should play in the lower division because they do not have juniors - yet they have been one of the best performed teams so far this year.

I believe a division should be filled by the teams that can field a full set of teams and then one with the rest. Over time the score issues will sort themselves out as the juniors filter through.
Those clubs that don't field Saturday junior teams can either merge, fold or continue along happy with the odd Sunday team (or none at all) but at least they won't stuff up our junior competition/Saturday structure any further.

Boo hoo, can't have your cake and eat it too.

Che?

Look Good In Leather wrote:

Front & Centre wrote:Are we about to see an old face return to the Valley?

Are Happy Valley going to sack Taylor even after having the 2nd best coaching record for their club over the past 5 years?
2 sackings in 3 weeks :shock:

Make that 3 in 3 with the Valley interchange steward sacking himself last night.

What happened at Cove in the last quarter.

Cove 7-3 45
Porties 6-9 45

Final score Cove 14-6 Porties 19-16

Look Good In Leather wrote:

Courtney Fish wrote:Replace Valleys with Christies would that please you LGIL?

That was not my point, we hear a lot about how we should split into 2 divisions, but nobody has come up with a model that will work.

The main motivator every time seems to be knee-jerk reactions to some one-sided games, but then a proposer will suggest that a club like Morphettville Park should play in the lower division because they do not have juniors - yet they have been one of the best performed teams so far this year.

I believe a division should be filled by the teams that can field a full set of teams and then one with the rest. Over time the score issues will sort themselves out as the juniors filter through.
Those clubs that don't field Saturday junior teams can either merge, fold or continue along happy with the odd Sunday team (or none at all) but at least they won't stuff up our junior competition/Saturday structure any further.

Maybe no Under 18's could be an exception otherwise Noarlunga, Cove and Morphett Vale won't have a full set of Juniors. So might as well have the twisties in there too.

Courtney Fish wrote:

Look Good In Leather wrote:

Courtney Fish wrote:Replace Valleys with Christies would that please you LGIL?

That was not my point, we hear a lot about how we should split into 2 divisions, but nobody has come up with a model that will work.

The main motivator every time seems to be knee-jerk reactions to some one-sided games, but then a proposer will suggest that a club like Morphettville Park should play in the lower division because they do not have juniors - yet they have been one of the best performed teams so far this year.

I believe a division should be filled by the teams that can field a full set of teams and then one with the rest. Over time the score issues will sort themselves out as the juniors filter through.
Those clubs that don't field Saturday junior teams can either merge, fold or continue along happy with the odd Sunday team (or none at all) but at least they won't stuff up our junior competition/Saturday structure any further.

Maybe no Under 18's could be an exception otherwise Noarlunga, Cove and Morphett Vale won't have a full set of Juniors. So might as well have the twisties in there too.

If their survival in the top division relied upon it, I am sure they would doorknock the entire suburb hunting for the players.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink ...... no matter how hard clubs work to get juniors..... if kids don't to play then they wont .... this junior topic has been going on since the old Glenelg / South League and Southern League looked at a merger in the early 80's .... and it hasn't changed one bit .....

If a change to 15/17s which was voted by the clubs before being kyboshed by the SFL actually went ahead we wouldn't be having the issue with who has the full quota and who doesn't. The fact of the matter is most clubs if not all but Towns would of in all likelyhood fielded both grades. Powerhouse junior clubs (Cove + Emus) not fielding a full quota and only 10 teams in 18s and 11 in 16s has to be a cause for concern.

Some people are for change others against but one thing for sure the league has been broken for a very long time - something must be done before it is too late (quality players are already leaving in droves). A change to 15/17 would have been a good start.

Broken Down Hack wrote:You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink ...... no matter how hard clubs work to get juniors..... if kids don't to play then they wont .... this junior topic has been going on since the old Glenelg / South League and Southern League looked at a merger in the early 80's .... and it hasn't changed one bit .....

Ah the old Glenelg-South merger/takeover. I think the juniors issue got an agreement but the main sticking point was the issue of gate fees, the Glenelg-South clubs did not want to pay to get into grounds and the whole deal fell over.

Flagstaff Hill bit the bullet and joined the SFL in 85, the then Southern Metro FL folded the following year and Marion, Morphettville Park & Plympton joined the SFL anyway as a result entering most of the junior sides required (Marion struggled initially with the juniors).
Blackwood headed off to the Hills, as for the other clubs that held out - Camden got absorbed by Greek first and later Plympton High Old Scholars, Glandore, Ovingham, Salesian & Wingfield Royals have all ended up in that big football league up in the sky. Mitchell Park & Brighton later joined the SFL anyway, Lockleys, Mitcham, Adelaide Lutheran & Colonel Light Gardens seem to have kept going ok albeit in the lower divisions of the Ammos, whilst Brompton, Norwood Union & Goodwood live on in merged entities.

The collapse of the Glenelg South league has benefitted no one except giving the SAAFL additional expansion, contributing to the centralisation of metropolitan football in Adelaide, the resulting imbalance of power within the SACFL, and provided us with a broken hybrid Saturday/Sunday junior system.

lion heart wrote:If a change to 15/17s which was voted by the clubs before being kyboshed by the SFL actually went ahead we wouldn't be having the issue with who has the full quota and who doesn't. The fact of the matter is most clubs if not all but Towns would of in all likelyhood fielded both grades. Powerhouse junior clubs (Cove + Emus) not fielding a full quota and only 10 teams in 18s and 11 in 16s has to be a cause for concern.

Some people are for change others against but one thing for sure the league has been broken for a very long time - something must be done before it is too late (quality players are already leaving in droves). A change to 15/17 would have been a good start.

And play Saturdays or Sundays?

Dutchy wrote:

lion heart wrote:If a change to 15/17s which was voted by the clubs before being kyboshed by the SFL actually went ahead we wouldn't be having the issue with who has the full quota and who doesn't. The fact of the matter is most clubs if not all but Towns would of in all likelyhood fielded both grades. Powerhouse junior clubs (Cove + Emus) not fielding a full quota and only 10 teams in 18s and 11 in 16s has to be a cause for concern.

Some people are for change others against but one thing for sure the league has been broken for a very long time - something must be done before it is too late (quality players are already leaving in droves). A change to 15/17 would have been a good start.

And play Saturdays or Sundays?

Saturday comp