marbles wrote:Else the vacancy is in div 5 at this stage
Wrong. I have it on very good authority D5 is not going to be available for entry - Brighton will be afforded D3 or D4..
A couple spots in D6 are being reserved for someone else as well..
by The Bedge » Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:23 am
marbles wrote:Else the vacancy is in div 5 at this stage
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by carey » Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:24 am
Zartan wrote:marbles wrote:Else the vacancy is in div 5 at this stage
Wrong. I have it on very good authority D5 is not going to be available for entry - Brighton will be afforded D3 or D4..
A couple spots in D6 are being reserved for someone else as well..
by The Bedge » Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:34 am
by Dutchy » Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:06 am
by Esteban Vihaio » Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:14 am
Dutchy wrote:Brighton are trying to get away from one sided matches every other week, if they go into D4 they will face one sided matches every week!
by banterfordays » Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:29 am
by marbles » Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:56 am
Zartan wrote:marbles wrote:Else the vacancy is in div 5 at this stage
Wrong. I have it on very good authority D5 is not going to be available for entry - Brighton will be afforded D3 or D4..
A couple spots in D6 are being reserved for someone else as well..
by The Bedge » Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:59 am
marbles wrote:err dude how can it be wrong. the current vacancy is in div 4
2 teams will come up, and 1 team is going down. that makes 9 teams in div 5 currently next year. The vacancy is therefore in div 5 "at this point"
your wonderful notion that theres places here and there means current existing clubs are gonna get f####d over, just so SFL clubs can come in and fill your slots, let hope its ingle farm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by marbles » Tue Jul 12, 2016 12:45 pm
Zartan wrote:marbles wrote:err dude how can it be wrong. the current vacancy is in div 4
2 teams will come up, and 1 team is going down. that makes 9 teams in div 5 currently next year. The vacancy is therefore in div 5 "at this point"
your wonderful notion that theres places here and there means current existing clubs are gonna get f####d over, just so SFL clubs can come in and fill your slots, let hope its ingle farm
I'm telling you it's wrong because it is
Regardless where the vacancy lies this year - and where it should lie next year, that wont be the case, and no side will be entering into D5 in 2017.
Yes some existing club may get screwed over.. unlucky.. it is what it is.
by The Bedge » Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:03 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by marbles » Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:29 pm
Zartan wrote:What ever, I don't care lol - you're confusing me
Moral of the story is NO ONE is entering SAAFL in D5 next season - they will be placed higher or lower depending who they are. This is fact.
by tigerpie » Tue Jul 12, 2016 2:02 pm
marbles wrote:Zartan wrote:What ever, I don't care lol - you're confusing me
Moral of the story is NO ONE is entering SAAFL in D5 next season - they will be placed higher or lower depending who they are. This is fact.
at this stage no club is joining saafl and there will be 9 teams in div 5, so you might wanna finish 3rd in div 6 and youll also get promoted cos 3 teams will have to go up #inglefarm
anyways any idiot who votes no to brighton leaving will assist their club in remaining in 30 goal noncompetitive victories every second week for another 5 years
by Luke15 » Tue Jul 12, 2016 5:03 pm
tigerpie wrote:marbles wrote:Zartan wrote:What ever, I don't care lol - you're confusing me
Moral of the story is NO ONE is entering SAAFL in D5 next season - they will be placed higher or lower depending who they are. This is fact.
at this stage no club is joining saafl and there will be 9 teams in div 5, so you might wanna finish 3rd in div 6 and youll also get promoted cos 3 teams will have to go up #inglefarm
anyways any idiot who votes no to brighton leaving will assist their club in remaining in 30 goal noncompetitive victories every second week for another 5 years
Brighton play cove, morphie park, reynella, flaggies and christies in the next 5 games. If they win ANY of those games by 30 goals i'll eat me hat!
Sure there are some inequities in the comp but when you play the lesser teams it gives you an opportunity to rest blokes and have a look at some youth.
Marbles you peddle some tripe.
by Boof » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:48 pm
Luke15 wrote:tigerpie wrote:marbles wrote:Zartan wrote:What ever, I don't care lol - you're confusing me
Moral of the story is NO ONE is entering SAAFL in D5 next season - they will be placed higher or lower depending who they are. This is fact.
at this stage no club is joining saafl and there will be 9 teams in div 5, so you might wanna finish 3rd in div 6 and youll also get promoted cos 3 teams will have to go up #inglefarm
anyways any idiot who votes no to brighton leaving will assist their club in remaining in 30 goal noncompetitive victories every second week for another 5 years
Brighton play cove, morphie park, reynella, flaggies and christies in the next 5 games. If they win ANY of those games by 30 goals i'll eat me hat!
Sure there are some inequities in the comp but when you play the lesser teams it gives you an opportunity to rest blokes and have a look at some youth.
Marbles you peddle some tripe.
I tend to agree with Tigerpie here and i am very very surprised more clubs do not do it..expecially those at the top that are in a position to do so. I went back through Sportingpulse and it is very evident that a club like Brighton doesnt do this. Use the games against the bottom sides to blood some kids and reward players. Look at Reynella for example, unless it is a misprint but they have used 47 different players through the A grade this year. That is a phenomenal number and you would have to say they will be better in the long run. Anyone from Reynella shed light on why so many have been used. Coaches philosophy?? Injuries?? Or combination of both??
by marbles » Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:11 pm
by Esteban Vihaio » Tue Jul 12, 2016 10:42 pm
marbles wrote:If all clubs joined there would hav to be conferences or something
The top 5 sfl club join the top 5 div 2 clubs
The top 6-10 sfl clubs join the bottom 5 div 3 clubs
A 20 team conference or some shit premiers go to div 1 following season
The remaining sfl clubs would go to div 6 or 7
Oh and theres a vacant spot in div 5
Aldinga to gsfl?
by marbles » Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:05 pm
Esteban Vihaio wrote:marbles wrote:If all clubs joined there would hav to be conferences or something
The top 5 sfl club join the top 5 div 2 clubs
The top 6-10 sfl clubs join the bottom 5 div 3 clubs
A 20 team conference or some shit premiers go to div 1 following season
The remaining sfl clubs would go to div 6 or 7
Oh and theres a vacant spot in div 5
Aldinga to gsfl?
The top 5 clubs are better than that, doesn't logic dictate they will expand the SANFL to be a 14 club comp by addIng the top 5 SFL clubs
by shoe boy » Wed Jul 13, 2016 9:23 am
by LaughingKookaburra » Wed Jul 13, 2016 9:57 am
by mighty hounds » Wed Jul 13, 2016 10:09 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:SB just because 1 club says that it doesn't mean that's the case with all. If a SAAFL club wants to really connect it's Senior and Junior connection it's completely up to the individual club. When we did have 16's and 18's many of the 16's trained with the senior squad to better them selves and 18's trained with the Seniors religiously every Tuesday and Thursday. We ended up winning 4 senior flags as a result in coming years. League culture has zero impact and just because you play on different days it doesn't mean you can't connect both concepts of your club.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |