Edwardstown still looking

A forum dedicated to the Southern Football League!

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby scottroo » Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:00 pm

KEYDEFENDER wrote:
GO THE PUNT wrote:Yeh sid can play but took the option to chase money in a lower grade which may say he couldn't get $ in the sfl. Div six is not near the top 8 in sfl and yes I have played in both divs. Also I believe sid is'nt playing next year due to work.


I dont think anyone whould have offered him $$ for the SFL as he was still quite young. CLG seen a chance and grabbed it good luck to them.
Pity he is moving on from footy, I suppose work can do that to you.


he'll play next year
scottroo
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:49 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 183 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Specky McGee » Fri Nov 28, 2008 6:18 pm

scottroo wrote:
Specky McGee wrote:
scottroo wrote:we played hackham 3 years ago, we finished bottom of div 6 that year and we beat hackham by 50 goals

we played plympton in a trial last year and lost by a couple of goals..

we have allot of ex marion players, some ex cove players, and a few more and they all agree we would beat marion, OSB lonsdale, Hackham, Aldinga, Morh parks, flaggys, we would push teams like nourlunga, christies etc


I think its funny how good you think Colonel Light Gardens are! You choked massively in the finals this year and are still languishing in DIVISION 6!!

Your ex Marion players are handy at best, and I think you'll find they were playing a combination of B's and A's before they left for your club. If they were fringe A graders for a previous club and are now first choice A graders at your club, unless they have improved considerably, wouldnt that suggest their previous club was stronger? Players like Snell, Maddox and Davey played regular B grade, with Ramsay the only first choice A grader.

Obviously you are bias towards your club, like we all are, but dont get on here and suggest a DIVISION 6 club would make the top 8 in the SFL. Out of the teams you mentioned, Id suggest you'd only beat Hackham.


have you ever actually seen a division 6 game of footy? i wouldnt say we choked either, we played very good footy in both finals, but injuries to key players hurt


Didnt choke? Id say finishing top and then going out in straight sets is choking in anyones language! But you do seem to have a skewed sense of reality!

And if your suggesting that CLG would make the finals in the SFL based on a trial you had with Hackham 3 years ago, you truely are deluded.
Specky McGee
Under 16s
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:45 am
Location: At the pub
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby scottroo » Fri Nov 28, 2008 8:26 pm

where did i say that? i stated that i thought this after talking to players who have played in both leagues...get a clue mate
scottroo
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 12:49 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 183 times
Grassroots Team: Colonel Light Gardens

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby LaughingKookaburra » Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:03 pm

Specky McGee wrote:
scottroo wrote:
Specky McGee wrote:
scottroo wrote:we played hackham 3 years ago, we finished bottom of div 6 that year and we beat hackham by 50 goals

we played plympton in a trial last year and lost by a couple of goals..

we have allot of ex marion players, some ex cove players, and a few more and they all agree we would beat marion, OSB lonsdale, Hackham, Aldinga, Morh parks, flaggys, we would push teams like nourlunga, christies etc


I think its funny how good you think Colonel Light Gardens are! You choked massively in the finals this year and are still languishing in DIVISION 6!!

Your ex Marion players are handy at best, and I think you'll find they were playing a combination of B's and A's before they left for your club. If they were fringe A graders for a previous club and are now first choice A graders at your club, unless they have improved considerably, wouldnt that suggest their previous club was stronger? Players like Snell, Maddox and Davey played regular B grade, with Ramsay the only first choice A grader.

Obviously you are bias towards your club, like we all are, but dont get on here and suggest a DIVISION 6 club would make the top 8 in the SFL. Out of the teams you mentioned, Id suggest you'd only beat Hackham.


have you ever actually seen a division 6 game of footy? i wouldnt say we choked either, we played very good footy in both finals, but injuries to key players hurt


Didnt choke? Id say finishing top and then going out in straight sets is choking in anyones language! But you do seem to have a skewed sense of reality!

And if your suggesting that CLG would make the finals in the SFL based on a trial you had with Hackham 3 years ago, you truely are deluded.

Trial games are nothing anyway. You lost to Plympton by a couple of goals, If you think Plympton were anything near full strength you would be kidding yourself. Central Utd (Stone cold bottom in div 5 beat Hope Valley div 6 Grand Finalists in a trial,make sence of that?) . You did not beat Hackham by 50 goals, would have been at the most by 25 and that was over 6 or 8 quaters and most of the damage was done in the B's, when the A's played it was an interesting contest. Whilst i'd back you against the bottom 3 sides in the SFL (If Lonsdale had Dean,Loveridge and Baxter playing you would not get near them) the Div 6 comp this year was no way near the standard that has been set over the past 4-5 years and you would not make the 8 in the SFL and this is from a bloke who's played and witnessed plenty of footy from both leagues. The blokes you ask would be biarst, what would you expect them to say "nah were s**t,we would not touch Flaggies" :lol: . The end of the day who cares if you would make the 8 or not because there is no way in hell we are going to find out :?
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?
LaughingKookaburra
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6262
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:22 am
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 796 times
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby asert » Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:47 am

he only left for a hundred dollars a game... all he had to do is go to half the clubs in the sfl and get a standard match payment. i think you will find he left bombers cos of a scene made and never played a grade for the rest of the season even tho got best pretty much each game in the 2s. good bloke tho
User avatar
asert
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1049
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby asert » Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:54 pm

has the money dried up or are towns still buying up big
User avatar
asert
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1049
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Look Good In Leather » Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:28 am

I notice Edwardstown have withdrawn their U/18 team now so they will only field A & B grade teams - so much for being a strong club, looks like Mitchell Park all over again. SFL have shown themselves to be weak as piss yet again.
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2074
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:50 am
Has liked: 151 times
Been liked: 288 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Kart Horse » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:18 am

Look Good In Leather wrote:I notice Edwardstown have withdrawn their U/18 team now so they will only field A & B grade teams - so much for being a strong club, looks like Mitchell Park all over again. SFL have shown themselves to be weak as piss yet again.



Cant agree more. I spoke with a committee member and the major sponsor at edwardstown last year and they said that they never planned to play the u18 because it was on a saturday but they new they had to make it look like they were planning to have them! The SFL very soft on this!
Kart Horse
Rookie
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Esteban Vihaio » Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:58 am

Kart Horse wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:I notice Edwardstown have withdrawn their U/18 team now so they will only field A & B grade teams - so much for being a strong club, looks like Mitchell Park all over again. SFL have shown themselves to be weak as piss yet again.



Cant agree more. I spoke with a committee member and the major sponsor at edwardstown last year and they said that they never planned to play the u18 because it was on a saturday but they new they had to make it look like they were planning to have them! The SFL very soft on this!


Firstly, Until all teams in the SFL have the full compliment of juniors, I find this talk of not admitting clubs without, a bit rich.

Secondly, If you want the competition to expand, you'll have to accept the fact that most clubs in surrounding leagues will not have a full compliment of juniors from u/8 - u/18's as their catchment areas are generally smaller than most of the SFL. Just look at how few clubs in the SAAFL fielded U/18 last year.
Where's Bill? Yeah... Hmm... Bill is on the Villa Quatro, on the road to Salina. I will draw you a map.
User avatar
Esteban Vihaio
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1128
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:48 pm
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 36 times

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Kart Horse » Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:08 am

Cant agree more. I spoke with a committee member and the major sponsor at edwardstown last year and they said that they never planned to play the u18 because it was on a saturday but they new they had to make it look like they were planning to have them! The SFL very soft on this![/quote]

Firstly, Until all teams in the SFL have the full compliment of juniors, I find this talk of not admitting clubs without, a bit rich.

Secondly, If you want the competition to expand, you'll have to accept the fact that most clubs in surrounding leagues will not have a full compliment of juniors from u/8 - u/18's as their catchment areas are generally smaller than most of the SFL. Just look at how few clubs in the SAAFL fielded U/18 last year.[/quote]

Every existing Sfl club has at least 1 junior team! How can we accept new clubs that only have seniors in our comp! This means our junior sides will have to play at different grounds to our seniors putting exta pressure on clubs.
Kart Horse
Rookie
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:39 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Sorry Dude » Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:16 am

I totally agree with Kart Horse. The league is not even close to be club friendly at the moment, but the teams that have nominated for season 2009 have 1 or more juniors sides. Clubs are always going to have to have juniors at 1 ground and seniors at another. Like last year our U/18’s which we had a few playing in the A grade were at Marion against M/V and the 14’s, Bs and A’s were at Aldinga. How are you supposed to get trainers, support and fans to both. Edwardstown are only just adding to the problems we had from 08 and making them harder with no juniors.
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
Has liked: 156 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby HH3 » Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:50 pm

That happened quite a few times last year
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
HH3
Coach
 
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Has liked: 3301 times
Been liked: 2433 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby asert » Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:40 pm

hackham hawk wrote:I totally agree with Kart Horse. The league is not even close to be club friendly at the moment, but the teams that have nominated for season 2009 have 1 or more juniors sides. Clubs are always going to have to have juniors at 1 ground and seniors at another. Like last year our U/18’s which we had a few playing in the A grade were at Marion against M/V and the 14’s, Bs and A’s were at Aldinga. How are you supposed to get trainers, support and fans to both. Edwardstown are only just adding to the problems we had from 08 and making them harder with no juniors.

so true it does make it pretty hard on the support staff. i did an ankle once cos of that exact reason our trainer was late from doing another grade at a diff ground and i had to go out without strapping. cost me a few on the side
User avatar
asert
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1049
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby GO THE PUNT » Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:35 pm

The league hasn,t been club friendly Hackam Hawk? they allowed you guys back and still let you guys play the rubbish thats been runing out on the field the last 2 years. A bit harsh i know but you guys arn,t the only club thats had it lucky. Aldinga,morphie parks, marion, lonsdale have all got away with f**kall juniors. Edwardstown would bring more to the league just by having seniors then what the above clubs would.
GO THE PUNT
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby HH3 » Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:31 pm

Mate stuff like that just makes you look stupid...not us or any other clubs you mentioned
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
HH3
Coach
 
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Has liked: 3301 times
Been liked: 2433 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Sorry Dude » Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:38 pm

GO THE PUNT wrote:The league hasn,t been club friendly Hackam Hawk? they allowed you guys back and still let you guys play the rubbish thats been runing out on the field the last 2 years. A bit harsh i know but you guys arn,t the only club thats had it lucky. Aldinga,morphie parks, marion, lonsdale have all got away with f**kall juniors. Edwardstown would bring more to the league just by having seniors then what the above clubs would.

that is the most stupid post i have read since being on here. we are a club that is going through a re-building stage and has always had a junior side in the league. last 2 years have had a full quota of juniors. all be it our seniors have not been the strongest but that is not what we are debating here. it is very dissapointing that all the clubs dont have a full quota of juniors but the struggling sides that have little or no juniors are still trying to do the best they can and fill juniors sides.e/town are coming and not even thinking about bringing juniors.
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 am
Has liked: 156 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Bluedemon » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:15 pm

Edwardstown's reason for not having an U/18's side is that some of them play college footy or work on a saturday morning. They have been used to playing junior football on a sunday.
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
User avatar
Bluedemon
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4958
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Goodwood
Has liked: 135 times
Been liked: 106 times

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby shoe boy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:48 pm

kookas wrote:Edwardstown's reason for not having an U/18's side is that some of them play college footy or work on a saturday morning. They have been used to playing junior football on a sunday.


they knew that when they made claims to putting juniours into the SFL "Pathetic" :-q
User avatar
shoe boy
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4592
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:58 pm
Has liked: 517 times
Been liked: 223 times

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby asert » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:04 pm

i rate a bit of what go the punt has said as towns coming into the sfl has now put pressure on flaggies marion shoes and christies mostly to have a big improvement as now there is only one spot left in the 8, they will also challenge the top 4 and now the above teams strengthen the league and are going to be closer to the top 7 or they will fall behind.i think thats great
not taking anything away from the hawks as i think its great they are passionate again and are improveing
User avatar
asert
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1049
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 8:08 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Edwardstown still looking

Postby Bluedemon » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:35 pm

shoe boy wrote:
kookas wrote:Edwardstown's reason for not having an U/18's side is that some of them play college footy or work on a saturday morning. They have been used to playing junior football on a sunday.


they knew that when they made claims to putting juniours into the SFL "Pathetic" :-q


I agree shoe boy, they should never have promised that. I also have heard that one of there other requirements is that they must bring all their juniors over there in the next 2 years, we will see if that happens.
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
User avatar
Bluedemon
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4958
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Goodwood
Has liked: 135 times
Been liked: 106 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  SFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |