by Q. » Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:06 pm
by nuggety goodness » Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:11 pm
by Rik E Boy » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:18 am
by Q. » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:51 am
by Hondo » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:52 am
by Q. » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:59 am
by Gingernuts » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:01 am
by Hondo » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:38 am
Quichey wrote:I tell ya what though, if he does get injured this year, I won't be so quick to trade him out this time
by Q. » Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:00 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:36 am
Quichey wrote:It's all relative REB. If you're making sacrifices elsewhere to have him in the team, then that extra 50 points is merely covering, for instance, the inconsistency of a third/fourth starting rookie.
by Q. » Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:46 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Quichey wrote:It's all relative REB. If you're making sacrifices elsewhere to have him in the team, then that extra 50 points is merely covering, for instance, the inconsistency of a third/fourth starting rookie.
Who earns you a lot more cash than an Adam Cooney.
regards,
REB
by Hondo » Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:32 pm
by Rik E Boy » Thu Mar 18, 2010 1:12 pm
Quichey wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Quichey wrote:It's all relative REB. If you're making sacrifices elsewhere to have him in the team, then that extra 50 points is merely covering, for instance, the inconsistency of a third/fourth starting rookie.
Who earns you a lot more cash than an Adam Cooney.
regards,
REB
Do you dare suggest that Coons will be inconsistent this year? Could be a worry for 90% of fantasy coaches who have him in their team
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |