by TOS_lad23 » Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:48 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:56 pm
by whufc » Thu Jul 05, 2012 6:15 pm
by Jase » Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:21 am
by whufc » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:04 am
Jase wrote:My little boys is devastated... He loved Flores, he was the mascot that walked out with him in the first ACL game he played for the Reds... I'm pretty pissed off as well...
I don't understand why they club couldn't come to an arrangement to back end his contract, minimal amount in the first year, then give him wads of cash in the 2nd and 3rd years. Now idiots are talking about the next big thing to fill the final spot. Really, the club new what they were going to get with Flores, but now people think it will be easy to find a replacement from some South/Central American country who will be as good for less money... Sorry it isn't that easy...
Very tempted to let the Gold Family Season Ticket go this year... probably will still get it, but won't be taking my young un to the Victory Games...
Just looking at this picture and in 3 years, we only have 3 players from that team still with us...
by Jase » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:20 am
whufc wrote:Jase wrote:My little boys is devastated... He loved Flores, he was the mascot that walked out with him in the first ACL game he played for the Reds... I'm pretty pissed off as well...
I don't understand why they club couldn't come to an arrangement to back end his contract, minimal amount in the first year, then give him wads of cash in the 2nd and 3rd years. Now idiots are talking about the next big thing to fill the final spot. Really, the club new what they were going to get with Flores, but now people think it will be easy to find a replacement from some South/Central American country who will be as good for less money... Sorry it isn't that easy...
Very tempted to let the Gold Family Season Ticket go this year... probably will still get it, but won't be taking my young un to the Victory Games...
Just looking at this picture and in 3 years, we only have 3 players from that team still with us...
The Flores Melbourne Victory strip is the mail for your young un.![]()
Another Melbournce Victory fan is created.
by the joker » Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:01 pm
by mickey » Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:34 pm
by Il Duce » Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:28 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:37 pm
by Il Duce » Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:42 pm
by mickey » Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:52 pm
Il Duce wrote:I quite both kits, I like the way they both have the state and club colours without looking like a crows, 36ers or any state rep top. They are nice, simple, clean and look likes a football kit so it ticks all my boxes.
by Il Duce » Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:15 pm
mickey wrote:Il Duce wrote:I quite both kits, I like the way they both have the state and club colours without looking like a crows, 36ers or any state rep top. They are nice, simple, clean and look likes a football kit so it ticks all my boxes.
Why should they have the state colours? Just like the crows, they are not a state team..
by mickey » Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:25 pm
Il Duce wrote:mickey wrote:Il Duce wrote:I quite both kits, I like the way they both have the state and club colours without looking like a crows, 36ers or any state rep top. They are nice, simple, clean and look likes a football kit so it ticks all my boxes.
Why should they have the state colours? Just like the crows, they are not a state team..
cause those colours happen to be the club colours as well. So we have and if we are gonna use them thats fine, i just dont want to look like a state rep team or the crows or the 36ers. I would like to unique in our use of the colours with in our kits.
by Il Duce » Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:32 pm
mickey wrote:Il Duce wrote:mickey wrote:Il Duce wrote:I quite both kits, I like the way they both have the state and club colours without looking like a crows, 36ers or any state rep top. They are nice, simple, clean and look likes a football kit so it ticks all my boxes.
Why should they have the state colours? Just like the crows, they are not a state team..
cause those colours happen to be the club colours as well. So we have and if we are gonna use them thats fine, i just dont want to look like a state rep team or the crows or the 36ers. I would like to unique in our use of the colours with in our kits.
Nothing wrong with the kit.. more the fact that clubs tend to steal/borrow the state colours too often.
I would have preferred their original strip to be a Man City type blue, but its history now. As it stands, they are the reds and IMO should stick to that and try and get as many fans in red at the games.
by whufc » Wed Jul 18, 2012 6:35 pm
mickey wrote:Il Duce wrote:mickey wrote:Il Duce wrote:I quite both kits, I like the way they both have the state and club colours without looking like a crows, 36ers or any state rep top. They are nice, simple, clean and look likes a football kit so it ticks all my boxes.
Why should they have the state colours? Just like the crows, they are not a state team..
cause those colours happen to be the club colours as well. So we have and if we are gonna use them thats fine, i just dont want to look like a state rep team or the crows or the 36ers. I would like to unique in our use of the colours with in our kits.
Nothing wrong with the kit.. more the fact that clubs tend to steal/borrow the state colours too often.
I would have preferred their original strip to be a Man City type blue, but its history now. As it stands, they are the reds and IMO should stick to that and try and get as many fans in red at the games.
by Jim05 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:02 pm
by mickey » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:16 pm
by whufc » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:17 pm
mickey wrote:I dunno really seeing I'm a Liverpool supporter. They got the name right!
There was at least 2 red teams in the nsl when they entered and the light blue would have been a point of difference.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |