EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

EPL, FA Cup, Carling Cup, The Championship, etc

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby mighty hounds » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:33 pm

LMA wrote:
mighty hounds wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
Bulldog wrote:Image


WTF is Liverpool doing on that list :lol:


I have never agreed that Liverpool should be part of the "Big 4" list. They haven't done enough and been a consistant top 4 team to warrant it


Well who would be the 4 then, there is no way Man City or Tottenham have performed better and more consistent than Liverpool since the premier league inception, the only year any of those teams have finished higher than Liverpool was last season, maybe a Big 3 would be a better term as only 3 of the Big 4 have ever won the premiership and the only other club to win Blackburn wouldn't warrant that status. The only others to be considered IMO would be Everton and Villa.

Liverpool vs Everton, Man C, Tottenham, Villa since premier league inception

Top 4 finishes 12 vs 4
Community Shields 2 vs 1
Carling Cups 3 vs 2
FA Cups 2 vs 1
UEFA Cups 1 vs 0
Champions League 1 vs 0

I think the facts speak for itself ;)


English Premier League Title 0 vs 0 vs 0
mighty hounds
Coach
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:08 pm
Has liked: 91 times
Been liked: 286 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby mighty hounds » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:34 pm

LMA wrote:
mighty hounds wrote:
johntheclaret wrote:
Bulldog wrote:Image


WTF is Liverpool doing on that list :lol:


I have never agreed that Liverpool should be part of the "Big 4" list. They haven't done enough and been a consistant top 4 team to warrant it


Well who would be the 4 then, there is no way Man City or Tottenham have performed better and more consistent than Liverpool since the premier league inception, the only year any of those teams have finished higher than Liverpool was last season, maybe a Big 3 would be a better term as only 3 of the Big 4 have ever won the premiership and the only other club to win Blackburn wouldn't warrant that status. The only others to be considered IMO would be Everton and Villa.

Liverpool vs Everton, Man C, Tottenham, Villa since premier league inception

Top 4 finishes 12 vs 4
Community Shields 2 vs 1
Carling Cups 3 vs 2
FA Cups 2 vs 1
UEFA Cups 1 vs 0
Champions League 1 vs 0

I think the facts speak for itself ;)


English Premier League Title 0 vs 0 vs 0
mighty hounds
Coach
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:08 pm
Has liked: 91 times
Been liked: 286 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby LMA » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:04 pm

Yes I'm aware of their lack of Premier League success as you are probably aware of the pre 1992 success at the top flight, but that hasn't answered the question, if Liverpool haven't warranted a place in the "Big 4" because of their so called inconsistency show me another club that does. At the end of the day it just a term used which means SFA
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby mighty hounds » Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:24 pm

LMA wrote:Yes I'm aware of their lack of Premier League success as you are probably aware of the pre 1992 success at the top flight, but that hasn't answered the question, if Liverpool haven't warranted a place in the "Big 4" because of their so called inconsistency show me another club that does. At the end of the day it just a term used which means SFA


They havent featured enough in the top 4 since there success. Arsenal and Man UTD are the only two teams that have been consistanly in the top 4 for ages. Im only putting chelsea in there because of the premier league success. It had nothing to do with overseas trophies. only what u have done in ur homeland.

Liverpool havent won the big dance since ive been born but im aware of the success all those years ago.

It should be a "Big 3".
mighty hounds
Coach
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:08 pm
Has liked: 91 times
Been liked: 286 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby JK » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:44 pm

Other than utilising a different term, why is the premier league any different to the highest league pre-1992 .. Both are/were the top flight in the country arent they?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Bully » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:53 pm

thanks you LFC for beating chelsea for us to do us a favour :)
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Bulls forever » Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:13 pm

Can't understand why everyone is obsessed about this big four, yes Spurs record against these 4 named sides is crap away from home, as is there current EPL form. Over the past 5 years, there are only two teams that have dominated EPL and Europe, MU and Chelski, Arsenal haven't one a chook raffle in that time, Liverpool might just include the Champions League "best comeback in the history of top level soccer" win. So you have a big two, the next tier, that would probably be Arsenal & Liverpool, then Spurs, MC, etc. etc.
Bulls forever
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 5:27 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times
Grassroots Team: Tea Tree Gully

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby JK » Tue Nov 09, 2010 6:33 pm

Wouldnt say Chelsea have dominated Europe .. They've been one of the better teams for sure, but have only played in one (losing) final so they havent exactly dominated
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Jim05 » Tue Nov 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Chelsea good in europe? Laughing stock more like it. All that money and sweet fa
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48359
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3845 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Bulls forever » Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:51 pm

Jim05 wrote:Chelsea good in europe? Laughing stock more like it. All that money and sweet fa


Jimbo, you can bring up stats to prove me wrong, but behind MU, Chelski would be the best performed EPL side in Champions League in last 5 years - YES / NO. Anyway, enough of that crap, the topic is about a Big 4 in the EPL and quite simply it does not exist, top 2 - yes, but Arsenal and Liverpool have just not done enough of late to be put in the same catergory as MU and Chelski. To talk of Spurs and Man City in that bracket is laughable at the moment. Maybe when our new stadium (see website) is built and we can get 60,000 turning up to support the Spurs and generate the income, only time will tell.
Bulls forever
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 5:27 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 9 times
Grassroots Team: Tea Tree Gully

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby mighty hounds » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:40 pm

Good to see I generated some discussion. u guys that have talked about Europe have gone of the ball I talked about consistency in England and finishing regularly in the top 4
mighty hounds
Coach
 
Posts: 6880
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:08 pm
Has liked: 91 times
Been liked: 286 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby johntheclaret » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 pm

The big 4 is just a media term anyway. Like I said, when the term was first bandied about it was Man U, Liverpool, Arsenal and Spurs and Connie is spot on, it was about more than just on field success. It was about fanbase, influence, consistency, etc etc.

A lot has changed since then and personally I don't think a "big four" exists any more.

Chelsea will never been seen in the same class as Liverpool because anyone over 15 years old know they would be nothing without a foreigners investment. They don't have the kudos, fan base or history of Liverpool or Manu or even Spurs for that matter.
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Bully » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:55 pm

yes the big four is only from the media. These top 4 sides have been there for the past few seasons but dont forget a short while ago leeds and newcastle were up there so the big 4 does not exist .

i agree with JTC that chelsea would be no where (like they were before the russian billionaire arrived) and around the top 5-10 year in year out. Yes Ilduce you may have won cups in those times but you were not in the same league as you are now. On that topic i keep hearing that the russians money wont be around much longer and chelsea will have to pay it back? is this true?

we wont start on man city where they were a few years ago before the arabs came along, up and down like a yoyo
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby johntheclaret » Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:36 am

Herd today that Chelsea are going to apply to redevelop Earls Court. Not sure how true that is or even if they can. I understand there is a caveat regarding Chelsea and Stamford Bridge although I'm sure there will be wys round that.

Not sure about Roman pulling out Bully. his investment is via directors loans so should the club ever be sold (unlikely) then the new owners technically would have to repay him. But he can't demand Chelsea repay him unless there is a written contract that allows him to do so. Reality is the Chelsea could never repay that level of debt (£800m I think it is) and Roman would never take action that would put at risk his investment.

It is true though that his new wife has no interest in football and he has been pumping millions into her hobby of collecting art.
johntheclaret
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13277
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:39 am
Has liked: 409 times
Been liked: 580 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Jim05 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:52 am

Utd dropped points again this morning. Very average manchester derby, still dirty we didnt get all 3 points against those scumbags but at least we didnt lose
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48359
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3845 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby LMA » Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:38 am

mighty hounds wrote:Good to see I generated some discussion. u guys that have talked about Europe have gone of the ball I talked about consistency in England and finishing regularly in the top 4


12 times in 18 seasons sounds pretty regular to me
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby cossi11 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 11:58 am

A very disappointed toffees fan here! 64%/36% possession to Everton, 26 shots on goal against Boltons 11 and we went 1-0 down in the 79th minute or so from a stupid mistake by Jagielka, he was just too casual :evil:

At the end of the day we scraped a point so shouldnt complain too much! IMO Baines was my man of the match, so quick on the ball and can get some lethal crosses into the box and even create his own chances! He was head to head with Fellaini until he snapped for 1 quick second and kicked Robinson while they were both on the ground, utter stupidity from the big Belgium man, but on the positive side Fellaini looked in great form for his first game back in a couple of months.
2020 AFL Premiers: Richmond 12.9.81 def Geelong 7.8.50
2019 AFL Premiers: Richmond 17.12.114 def Greater Western Sydney 3.7.25
2017 AFL Premiers: Adelaide 8.12.60 def by Richmond 16.12.108
2012 D5 Premiers: Brahma Lodge 24.15.159 def Hope Valley 7.13.55
User avatar
cossi11
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3139
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Everton FC
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby RoosterMarty » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Jim05 wrote:Utd dropped points again this morning. Very average manchester derby, still dirty we didnt get all 3 points against those scumbags but at least we didnt lose


City are pathetic. They were happy to take a draw despite being at home. Considering they have spent so much money and want to win trophies it was pretty poor, they will never win anything with that attitude.

Not a bad point for United.
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Swooper16 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:35 pm

RoosterMarty wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Utd dropped points again this morning. Very average manchester derby, still dirty we didnt get all 3 points against those scumbags but at least we didnt lose


City are pathetic. They were happy to take a draw despite being at home. Considering they have spent so much money and want to win trophies it was pretty poor, they will never win anything with that attitude.

Not a bad point for United.


Both teams certainly looked like they were playing not to lose rather then to win. I guess Mancini must have thought if they lose that game he was without a job. Would have liked to have seen Utd play Hernandez & berba together for the final 10 mins and try and turn some of that possession into a goal. Utd will need to beat a few of the top teams away from home at some stage tho if we are any chance to take out the league after too many (stupidly) dropped points to start the season.
User avatar
Swooper16
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:48 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: EPL Discussion Thread 2010/2011

Postby Swooper16 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:35 pm

RoosterMarty wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Utd dropped points again this morning. Very average manchester derby, still dirty we didnt get all 3 points against those scumbags but at least we didnt lose


City are pathetic. They were happy to take a draw despite being at home. Considering they have spent so much money and want to win trophies it was pretty poor, they will never win anything with that attitude.

Not a bad point for United.


Both teams certainly looked like they were playing not to lose rather then to win. I guess Mancini must have thought if they lose that game he was without a job. Would have liked to have seen Utd play Hernandez & berba together for the final 10 mins and try and turn some of that possession into a goal. Utd will need to beat a few of the top teams away from home at some stage tho if we are any chance to take out the league after too many (stupidly) dropped points to start the season.
User avatar
Swooper16
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:48 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Soccer  English Soccer

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |