by Bully » Sun Sep 13, 2009 9:06 am
by johntheclaret » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:06 pm
Bulldog wrote:yes the stoke supporters were heart broken when that went in, awesome goals by both sides tho...
by johntheclaret » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:10 pm
Il Duce wrote:Bulldog wrote:I have to say i cant see how any team will beat Chelski this season the way they are playing at the moment.
Agreed, I have to admit I wasn't to pleased when we first signed Carlo as manager but he is doing well so far and has seemed to bring to some stabilty to the team, I havent seen us look this dominate since Jose was around, (sorry bout this JTC) was good to put Burnley back in there place of corse the bigger challenges will come when we face the other teams form the big 4 and Tottenham but you can only play the teams ur put up against. Btw who said Drogba and Anelka cant paly together??
by Il Duce » Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:16 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Bulldog wrote:yes the stoke supporters were heart broken when that went in, awesome goals by both sides tho...
Ref was always going to play until Chavski goaled. goal came from a blatant foul throw in. what has happened to the the foul throw rule. Blatant foul throw :roll:
by johntheclaret » Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:45 am
by Il Duce » Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:38 pm
Answer provided by Referee Keith Contarino
From Law 15
At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower:
faces the field of play;
has part of each foot either on the touch line or on the ground outside the touch line
uses both hands
delivers the ball from behind and over his head
Any of these things not done properly, it's a foul throw.
The reason you rarely see this called is that most referees at higher levels of play view infringements of Law 15 as "trifling" and allow the game to proceed
by Il Duce » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:15 am
by devilsadvocate » Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:16 pm
by Bully » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:52 pm
by johntheclaret » Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:23 pm
Bulldog wrote:didnt see the game but heard the result. Unlucky DA for your spuds
by Bully » Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:23 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Bulldog wrote:didnt see the game but heard the result. Unlucky DA for your spuds
Unlucky, you must be kidding Bully, Spurs were lucky they didn't lose by more. Chelsea totally dominated, and losing King certainly didn't help thier cause.
I only hope that they are not in a bad mood this week end
by johntheclaret » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:37 pm
Bulldog wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Bulldog wrote:didnt see the game but heard the result. Unlucky DA for your spuds
Unlucky, you must be kidding Bully, Spurs were lucky they didn't lose by more. Chelsea totally dominated, and losing King certainly didn't help thier cause.
I only hope that they are not in a bad mood this week end
trying to keep the peace mate
by Bully » Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:21 am
johntheclaret wrote:Bulldog wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Bulldog wrote:didnt see the game but heard the result. Unlucky DA for your spuds
Unlucky, you must be kidding Bully, Spurs were lucky they didn't lose by more. Chelsea totally dominated, and losing King certainly didn't help thier cause.
I only hope that they are not in a bad mood this week end
trying to keep the peace mate
F%&k the peace. I want a war of words, Arsenal v Spurs
![]()
by Il Duce » Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:25 am
by johntheclaret » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:41 am
Il Duce wrote:Oi you can talk about your 3 s***t clubs in your own threads !!!!![]()
by The Jack » Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:54 am
by Il Duce » Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:43 pm
by devilsadvocate » Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:07 pm
by johntheclaret » Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:07 am
by Il Duce » Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:56 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |