by Jim05 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 1:52 pm
by RoosterMarty » Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:45 pm
by Bully » Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:02 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Wilshere doesn't mind the odd dirty tackle here and there.
Arsenal's defending was poor, of all the players Vermaelen could have given the ball to it had to be RVP.You shouldn't let Evra head goals like that other. Good win though and it is great to be top.
by Il Duce » Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:46 pm
whufc wrote:I love watching Chelsea and arsenal fans argue who jumped on the bandwagon most like watching bill gates and dupery Murdoch argue over who was harder done by as a child
by Jim05 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:00 pm
Bully wrote:RoosterMarty wrote:Wilshere doesn't mind the odd dirty tackle here and there.
Arsenal's defending was poor, of all the players Vermaelen could have given the ball to it had to be RVP.You shouldn't let Evra head goals like that other. Good win though and it is great to be top.
unlike rooney hey
by Bully » Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:49 pm
by whufc » Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:42 pm
Il Duce wrote:whufc wrote:I love watching Chelsea and arsenal fans argue who jumped on the bandwagon most like watching bill gates and dupery Murdoch argue over who was harder done by as a child
even after all our wining of things, there still isnt much of a bandwagon, people hate us to much to jump on (which doesnt bother me) personaly i dont care, you go for who want to go for, for what ever reason...if you went for someone else then switched then i would have a problem.....btw you wont have to worry about it for a few reasons
1 - you guy cant afford a wagon
2- silver wear, silver wear you anit got no silver wear from upton park to anywhere you anit got no silver wear
by Il Duce » Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:47 pm
whufc wrote:Il Duce wrote:whufc wrote:I love watching Chelsea and arsenal fans argue who jumped on the bandwagon most like watching bill gates and dupery Murdoch argue over who was harder done by as a child
even after all our wining of things, there still isnt much of a bandwagon, people hate us to much to jump on (which doesnt bother me) personaly i dont care, you go for who want to go for, for what ever reason...if you went for someone else then switched then i would have a problem.....btw you wont have to worry about it for a few reasons
1 - you guy cant afford a wagon
2- silver wear, silver wear you anit got no silver wear from upton park to anywhere you anit got no silver wear
Lol either did use until Roman came along. And then when someone else with more money went elsewhere so did the premier league title. At least Man U and Arsenal have cred with what they have won.
No silverware at Upton Park hence the World Cup is more of a gold trophy
by whufc » Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:58 pm
by Il Duce » Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:13 pm
whufc wrote:Living off one league title before roman came along even Blackburn had achieved that.
Roman didn't buy a club he bought facilities, location, infrastructure and supporters then created his own club. Chelsea was nothing more than a business decision for him, if he could of changed the name he would of.
Your a gang banger with money but no street cred for anyone to care.
by whufc » Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:16 pm
Il Duce wrote:whufc wrote:Living off one league title before roman came along even Blackburn had achieved that.
Roman didn't buy a club he bought facilities, location, infrastructure and supporters then created his own club. Chelsea was nothing more than a business decision for him, if he could of changed the name he would of.
Your a gang banger with money but no street cred for anyone to care.
Blackburn did it by "buying the title" with jack walkers money
I doubt roman bought our facilities we use to train at harlington which ever confernce league teams have better training grounds, he has built us top of the range everything.
we may of struggled to win lots of things before roman but we still one, yes we went though hard times but we built ourselfs back up to where we qualifying for europe (uefa cup, cup winners cup and champions league) every season before roman can, in fact we almost one the title in 98/99, then in 03 roman came along and bought the club.
So I'd would say we out grew the hood and moved out, you guys are just upset cause we left you behind in the hood.
by whufc » Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:18 pm
Il Duce wrote:whufc wrote:Living off one league title before roman came along even Blackburn had achieved that.
Roman didn't buy a club he bought facilities, location, infrastructure and supporters then created his own club. Chelsea was nothing more than a business decision for him, if he could of changed the name he would of.
Your a gang banger with money but no street cred for anyone to care.
Blackburn did it by "buying the title" with jack walkers money
I doubt roman bought our facilities we use to train at harlington which ever confernce league teams have better training grounds, he has built us top of the range everything.
we may of struggled to win lots of things before roman but we still one, yes we went though hard times but we built ourselfs back up to where we qualifying for europe (uefa cup, cup winners cup and champions league) every season before roman can, in fact we almost one the title in 98/99, then in 03 roman came along and bought the club.
That's the thing Chelsea FC didn't outgrow any thing just the estate got bought out
So I'd would say we out grew the hood and moved out, you guys are just upset cause we left you behind in the hood.
by Il Duce » Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:19 pm
by whufc » Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:45 pm
Il Duce wrote:Aren't use the ones owned by a sex shop owner, pretty sure blowing bubbles has a double meaning at west ham
by Il Duce » Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:36 pm
whufc wrote:Il Duce wrote:Aren't use the ones owned by a sex shop owner, pretty sure blowing bubbles has a double meaning at west ham
Google Katy Perry west ham our cute little nickname for her is ''bubbles'
by Bully » Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:11 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Nov 05, 2012 8:33 pm
Bully wrote:Hate the guy, but he has a point -
Gary Neville : "I was disappointed with Arsenal
— and I was disappointed for them.
"I spent my whole career competing with them
for trophies; when you said their name, you
automatically thought championship...contenders.
"Not now, judging by the manner of their
performance at Old Trafford. When I think of
the great Arsenal teams under Arsene
Wenger, I can’t think of one player who
started at Old Trafford who would get into
them."
by mighty hounds » Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:43 am
by Jim05 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:53 am
by Bully » Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:14 pm
Jim05 wrote:Bully wrote:Hate the guy, but he has a point -
Gary Neville : "I was disappointed with Arsenal
— and I was disappointed for them.
"I spent my whole career competing with them
for trophies; when you said their name, you
automatically thought championship...contenders.
"Not now, judging by the manner of their
performance at Old Trafford. When I think of
the great Arsenal teams under Arsene
Wenger, I can’t think of one player who
started at Old Trafford who would get into
them."
Spot on by Gaz, I have already said how disappointing Arsenal were. They just didnt have the passion an desire of a Arsenal side we normally see. They look very flat
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |