
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgtvDSwReI&e
by RoosterMarty » Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:40 pm
by Bully » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:24 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Everyone needs to watch this piece of sheer brilliance from United. Stunning set play and goal but the incompetent linesman ruled it out.... and some people say United get everything their own way.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgtvDSwReI&e
by JK » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:43 pm
by smithy » Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:05 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Pains me to say, but that 3-nil scoreline appeared to flatter Chelsea, and bloody Ronaldo hasn't even got going yet
by devilsadvocate » Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:54 am
RoosterMarty wrote:Everyone needs to watch this piece of sheer brilliance from United. Stunning set play and goal but the incompetent linesman ruled it out.... and some people say United get everything their own way.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgtvDSwReI&e
by johntheclaret » Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:25 am
Constance_Perm wrote:According to tonights Highlights package, the linesman later said he saw it but "thought it was against the spirit of play" ... Only guessing here but his body language at the time suggested he didnt reallt know what was going on.
Pains me to say, but that 3-nil scoreline appeared to flatter Chelsea, and bloody Ronaldo hasn't even got going yet
by Bully » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:18 am
by RoosterMarty » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:12 am
johntheclaret wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:According to tonights Highlights package, the linesman later said he saw it but "thought it was against the spirit of play" ... Only guessing here but his body language at the time suggested he didnt reallt know what was going on.
Pains me to say, but that 3-nil scoreline appeared to flatter Chelsea, and bloody Ronaldo hasn't even got going yet
Personally, I would have rather said I hadn't seen it than come out with a piss weak statement like that.
I don't believe there is any law in the rules about " against the spirit of play".
Pathetic answer. Kick the fool out of the game.
by silicone skyline » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:13 am
by JK » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:16 am
RoosterMarty wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:According to tonights Highlights package, the linesman later said he saw it but "thought it was against the spirit of play" ... Only guessing here but his body language at the time suggested he didnt reallt know what was going on.
Pains me to say, but that 3-nil scoreline appeared to flatter Chelsea, and bloody Ronaldo hasn't even got going yet
Personally, I would have rather said I hadn't seen it than come out with a piss weak statement like that.
I don't believe there is any law in the rules about " against the spirit of play".
Pathetic answer. Kick the fool out of the game.
Totally agree. It was a rubbish response, he flagged because he wasn't paying attention. It's not up to the refs to decide about the spirit of play, they are there to govern the laws of the game. It was a genius move, completely fooled Chelsea and deserved to stand. Luckily we scored from the retake, just how bad was Chelsea's defence? What a shambles.
by silicone skyline » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:20 am
by BALLHOG » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:37 am
by JK » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:46 am
BALLHOG wrote:We need to get a few more United fans on here.
by silicone skyline » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:47 am
by smithy » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:39 am
Constance_Perm wrote:BALLHOG wrote:We need to get a few more United fans on here.
Most of them don't follow the football/soccer mate, they just wear the shirts
by BALLHOG » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:04 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:BALLHOG wrote:We need to get a few more United fans on here.
Most of them don't follow the football/soccer mate, they just wear the shirts
by JK » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:07 pm
BALLHOG wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:BALLHOG wrote:We need to get a few more United fans on here.
Most of them don't follow the football/soccer mate, they just wear the shirts
I would have to agree with you on that, met a bloke last year who was wearing a Man U top and started to talk about Soccer with him and he told me he doesn't follow it. He only bought it because it looked good. Man that pisses me off but must admit he has good taste.
by devilsadvocate » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:55 pm
BALLHOG wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:BALLHOG wrote:We need to get a few more United fans on here.
Most of them don't follow the football/soccer mate, they just wear the shirts
I would have to agree with you on that, met a bloke last year who was wearing a Man U top and started to talk about Soccer with him and he told me he doesn't follow it. He only bought it because it looked good. Man that pisses me off but must admit he has good taste.
by devilsadvocate » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:58 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:No doubt Liverpool picked up a heap of "fans" in the 70's and 80's when they became the "in" club to those without allegiance.
by BALLHOG » Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |