How ironic !
Constance_Perm wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:smithy wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Good work fella, they're the type of article I like to read
It was only interest on money owed as to why the bottom line looks bad, the club itself made a profit.
Man Utd and Arsenal owe much more money than us yet it never gets mentioned in the papers.
You got to wonder sometimes if certain journalists have agendas behind their allegiances.
The NOTW is 1 paper that I dont believe a word that is printed, only because it's the weekend version of the S*N, which for obvious reasons isn't read in the north west, but is also completely full of tripe when it comes to reporting on Liverpool "news".
While I agree with you on the Manure and Arse debt levels, they have the ability to fulfil their interest commitments and also re-finance when the debts become due. With all the in fighting between Hicks and Gillet, I can't see LFC having the ability to do the same unless they stop the handbags.
And while the club made a profit, if the parent entity is insolvent and has going concern issues, it's illegal for any part of the group to continue trading. That's the bit I'd be worried about.
Yeah that was always my understanding, that in the current climate H & G didn't have the capacity to gain re-financing ... I can't see DIC coming on board as a 3rd partner either, I'd suggest if they were to get involved they would want %100 control.
And I guess that's the thing that LFC fans can cling to. Dumb and dumber will realistically have to sell and they can do so at a reasonable market price soon, or in an administration fire sale not too far down the track. So the most likely outcome would have to be that H&G won't be screwing up the club for too much longer.
If DIC do buy the club, their patience will have been rewarded as they'll surely pay less now than previously.