by Grahaml » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:58 am
by lesthemechanic » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:34 am
by dedja » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:39 am
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:44 am
by Booney » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:42 pm
by dedja » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:09 pm
by Grahaml » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:33 pm
by whufc » Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:24 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:42 pm
whufc wrote:Time for the sport to let them all take drugs.
They will never get on top of this and there will always be questions asked about the champions for the next 100 years.
by dedja » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:46 pm
by southee » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:49 pm
Q. wrote:Lol'd at 'once'.
by southee » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:49 pm
dedja wrote:Cycling or AFL?
by Tassie Blues » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:12 am
by Grahaml » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:24 am
whufc wrote:Time for the sport to let them all take drugs.
They will never get on top of this and there will always be questions asked about the champions for the next 100 years.
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:33 am
Grahaml wrote:whufc wrote:Time for the sport to let them all take drugs.
They will never get on top of this and there will always be questions asked about the champions for the next 100 years.
Let's not forget the level of drug taking we know of in most sports now is very similar to what we thought was the case in cycling in the mid to late 90s. Cycling takes the fight more seriously than any other organisation and it's this very reason we even exposed riders like O'Grady, Armstron, Ullrich etc.
Personally, I think cycling right now is one of the cleanest sports around. The penalties, attitudes and vigor the authorities pursue any half lead gives me some optimism. Particularly when the average speeds of stages is so much lower than it was. But the image will stick for quite some time.
As for letting them all take drugs, I think that's reckless. Those that want to put their long term health first will be effectively retired despite working harder and being better. I think that's more unfair.
by Jim05 » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:34 am
southee wrote:dedja wrote:Cycling or AFL?
AFL gets my vote.
by Q. » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:28 am
Grahaml wrote:Let's not forget the level of drug taking we know of in most sports now is very similar to what we thought was the case in cycling in the mid to late 90s. Cycling takes the fight more seriously than any other organisation and it's this very reason we even exposed riders like O'Grady, Armstron, Ullrich etc.
by Booney » Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:42 am
Grahaml wrote:whufc wrote:Time for the sport to let them all take drugs.
They will never get on top of this and there will always be questions asked about the champions for the next 100 years.
Let's not forget the level of drug taking we know of in most sports now is very similar to what we thought was the case in cycling in the mid to late 90s. Cycling takes the fight more seriously than any other organisation and it's this very reason we even exposed riders like O'Grady, Armstron, Ullrich etc.
Personally, I think cycling right now is one of the cleanest sports around. The penalties, attitudes and vigor the authorities pursue any half lead gives me some optimism. Particularly when the average speeds of stages is so much lower than it was. But the image will stick for quite some time.
As for letting them all take drugs, I think that's reckless. Those that want to put their long term health first will be effectively retired despite working harder and being better. I think that's more unfair.
by heater31 » Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:44 am
Booney wrote:Grahaml wrote:whufc wrote:Time for the sport to let them all take drugs.
They will never get on top of this and there will always be questions asked about the champions for the next 100 years.
Let's not forget the level of drug taking we know of in most sports now is very similar to what we thought was the case in cycling in the mid to late 90s. Cycling takes the fight more seriously than any other organisation and it's this very reason we even exposed riders like O'Grady, Armstron, Ullrich etc.
Personally, I think cycling right now is one of the cleanest sports around. The penalties, attitudes and vigor the authorities pursue any half lead gives me some optimism. Particularly when the average speeds of stages is so much lower than it was. But the image will stick for quite some time.
As for letting them all take drugs, I think that's reckless. Those that want to put their long term health first will be effectively retired despite working harder and being better. I think that's more unfair.
I didn't think they ever complete the same stage twice? Well, never the exact same route anyway.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |