by DOC » Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:17 am
by am Bays » Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:24 am
DOC wrote:Why is the test not starting today?
Stop calling it the New Years Test.
by dedja » Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:25 am
am Bays wrote:DOC wrote:Why is the test not starting today?
Stop calling it the New Years Test.
The "Christmas Test" started over a week before Christmas Day, just saying....

by DOC » Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:29 am
dedja wrote:am Bays wrote:DOC wrote:Why is the test not starting today?
Stop calling it the New Years Test.
The "Christmas Test" started over a week before Christmas Day, just saying....
by Jim05 » Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:35 am
The Adelaide test was labelled the Christmas testDOC wrote:dedja wrote:am Bays wrote:DOC wrote:Why is the test not starting today?
Stop calling it the New Years Test.
The "Christmas Test" started over a week before Christmas Day, just saying....
I think it has been the Boxing Day test since about 1980.
by dedja » Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:37 am
DOC wrote:dedja wrote:am Bays wrote:DOC wrote:Why is the test not starting today?
Stop calling it the New Years Test.
The "Christmas Test" started over a week before Christmas Day, just saying....
I think it has been the Boxing Day test since about 1980.
by am Bays » Fri Jan 02, 2026 9:57 am
DOC wrote:dedja wrote:am Bays wrote:DOC wrote:Why is the test not starting today?
Stop calling it the New Years Test.
The "Christmas Test" started over a week before Christmas Day, just saying....
I think it has been the Boxing Day test since about 1980.
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 08, 2026 4:14 pm
by am Bays » Thu Jan 08, 2026 5:25 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 08, 2026 10:47 pm
by dedja » Thu Jan 08, 2026 11:56 pm

by Dutchy » Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:36 am
by am Bays » Fri Jan 09, 2026 9:50 am
Dutchy wrote:How does that explain the attack in July '23 in the middle of the dry?
by dedja » Fri Jan 09, 2026 10:49 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Jan 09, 2026 10:51 am
am Bays wrote:Dutchy wrote:How does that explain the attack in July '23 in the middle of the dry?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-11/nt-crocodile-caught-wangi-falls-litchfield-attack/102587720
It was a smaller male (2.4) which can be quite mobile as they are trying to find some territory to claim for themselves. With no other large males (4m+) in in that area (Litchfield quite heavily trapped) it founds some "safe" water for him. So it had probably on just got in there and was hungry.
At 2.4 m it is unlikely to be fatal to humans but the tourist has a bloody good souvenir from the NT
Can proudly say I've swum with a croc in Litchfield but the fact it was a 15 cm freshie is neither here nor there!!
by am Bays » Fri Jan 09, 2026 11:15 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:
So we humans can risk swimming in a spot where they have lived for millions of years and if they attack us we kill them? Makes sense.
by dedja » Fri Jan 09, 2026 11:25 am
by am Bays » Fri Jan 09, 2026 11:31 am
dedja wrote:They should be trapped and relocated elsewhere if possible, not shot and given to a croc butcher.
The Territory is a great place, but they’re a weird mob. Explains Bays with the amount of time he has spent up there.
by Dutchy » Fri Jan 09, 2026 11:40 am
by dedja » Fri Jan 09, 2026 12:26 pm
General Talk
General Discussion
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

