by Squawk » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:18 pm
by spell_check » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:31 pm
by Squawk » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:51 pm
spell_check wrote:Why does the drugs issue have to be kept hushed, but everything else is stuck everywhere like fairy floss?
by spell_check » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:53 pm
by JAS » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:55 pm
by Q. » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:38 am
by Ronnie » Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:58 am
Quichey wrote:Completely swept aside by Cycling Australia, who just wanted to wipe their hands clean of Dajka. And now Swimming Australia is doing it with D'Arcy. Shame for not providing the support for our turbulent, but still young, athletes.
by Q. » Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:08 pm
Ronnie wrote:Quichey wrote:Completely swept aside by Cycling Australia, who just wanted to wipe their hands clean of Dajka. And now Swimming Australia is doing it with D'Arcy. Shame for not providing the support for our turbulent, but still young, athletes.
People are meant to be responsible for their own actions, adults at least. The governing bodies can't stand back and watch criminal behaviour go unsactioned if they have any credibility.
But i would certainly question the role of the media in these events, the spotlight is on but they shy away from their own.
by Ronnie » Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:51 pm
Quichey wrote:Ronnie wrote:Quichey wrote:Completely swept aside by Cycling Australia, who just wanted to wipe their hands clean of Dajka. And now Swimming Australia is doing it with D'Arcy. Shame for not providing the support for our turbulent, but still young, athletes.
People are meant to be responsible for their own actions, adults at least. The governing bodies can't stand back and watch criminal behaviour go unsactioned if they have any credibility.
But i would certainly question the role of the media in these events, the spotlight is on but they shy away from their own.
I'm not absolving anyone of responsibility, just suggesting that these institutions are neglecting those that have strayed from their desired 'cookie-cutter' image. These are (or were) young people subject to enormous pressures who should not be cast aside forever because of a little turbulence.
by Q. » Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:56 am
by TEX07 » Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:02 pm
Quichey wrote:There's two other threads to discuss the D'Arcy incident. Much of which has been said in them I agree with and that is that he has served his punishment. Now Swimming Australia want nothing to do with him, much like Cycling Australia wanted nothing to do with Dajka. Quite happy to heap the pressure on our young stars but when cracks appear, c'ya later...
by interested observer » Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:13 pm
TEX07 wrote:Quichey wrote:There's two other threads to discuss the D'Arcy incident. Much of which has been said in them I agree with and that is that he has served his punishment. Now Swimming Australia want nothing to do with him, much like Cycling Australia wanted nothing to do with Dajka. Quite happy to heap the pressure on our young stars but when cracks appear, c'ya later...
I agree Quichey we tend to hang our sporting stars out to dry when something like this can happen! Very similar to the D'Arcy situation here, these guys train extremely hard for one event and both denied this event due to indiscretions. Not saying that they were worthy of going at all but supporting them and standing by them is what i would have liked to see. Having said this i have heard stories that Dajka had plenty of support early on when cracks started to appear and was given plenty of chances to pull his head in. Really shows me how low a person can get when they suffer from depression and how important mates are at that time. Really sad end to what seemed to be a really troubled life.
by Psyber » Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:23 am
TEX07 wrote:Quichey wrote:There's two other threads to discuss the D'Arcy incident. Much of which has been said in them I agree with and that is that he has served his punishment. Now Swimming Australia want nothing to do with him, much like Cycling Australia wanted nothing to do with Dajka. Quite happy to heap the pressure on our young stars but when cracks appear, c'ya later...
I agree Quichey we tend to hang our sporting stars out to dry when something like this can happen! Very similar to the D'Arcy situation here, these guys train extremely hard for one event and both denied this event due to indiscretions. Not saying that they were worthy of going at all but supporting them and standing by them is what i would have liked to see. Having said this i have heard stories that Dajka had plenty of support early on when cracks started to appear and was given plenty of chances to pull his head in. Really shows me how low a person can get when they suffer from depression and how important mates are at that time. Really sad end to what seemed to be a really troubled life.
by TEX07 » Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:23 pm
by Psyber » Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:17 pm
by TEX07 » Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:55 am
Psyber wrote:I'd go with "serious criminal assault". The law measures self-defence by the application of equal force.
If he'd just clipped Cowley around the ear with force equal to that he received it would have been fair retaliation.
Better still would have been to call the cops and lay an assault charge, if Cowley did hit him first.
I don't really believe that story of being fearful of being hit again.
You know the rules of the association when you take up the sport, or certainly do once you've been there a while.
You break the rules and the association quite reasonably dumps you.
If you decide to take up professional sport you are volunteering for the pressure involved, and you own responsibility for it, as well as your own behaviour.
The problem is, "I can do whatever I like 'cos I'm a star and they need me!"
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |