Peter Falconia wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:60 Australain swimmers, went to the C'wealth games, only 6-12 of them can make a living out of it the rest get Naff all apart from expenses being covered by the AIS and state based institutes of sport......
Peter Falconia wrote:Swimmers and runners are rewarded in line with how much entertainment they give i.e. Bugger all.
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Well given that commercial endorsements in sport depend on how well you are: rated by the public / exposed, that statement sort of flies in the face of your first unsubstantiated sweeping generalisation....

Out of 60 AFL footballers, none are relying on Government handouts.
Would you like to retract any of your statements?
Nup and I can name several AFL Footballers who have in the past relied on Government handouts and support to get the opportunity to be in a position to be drafted......
Basically any kid in the last five years from Tasmania, ACT, NSW, QLD and the NT who has been drafted have had government indirect support at the U/18 level, and some have had direct financial support.......
FYI the Queensland Academy of Sport aka governemnt gives some of the elite NRL QLDers scholarships for playing SOO....
And do you want me to mention any of the test cricketers that have had government support........from both the State academies and institute of sports and the AIS??????
Mind you, I wil conceed, there are some athletes/tennis/swimmers that arguably get too much publicity compared to others in their chosen sports of equal/better ability, but to say everyone is overrated
As heater said if it was so friggin easy we'd all be doing it......
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!