Although not a prolific user of emoticons/smilies myself, I thought the max was 10, but now it seems the max is 4.

by Squawk » Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:15 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:31 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:05 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:What a waste, you had 3 more to use...![]()
Yep, smileys are in short supply, therefore, we need to place restrictions on such precious commodities![]()
Thus, the 4 smiley limit now applies..
by Squawk » Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:17 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:36 pm
Squawk wrote:ROFLMAO (please dont restrict acronyms to max of 4 letters only, or that will be out too!)
This news has now hit the boards in the West vs Glenelg thread. Some unhappy campers I fear...
by Squawk » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:12 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:Squawk wrote:ROFLMAO (please dont restrict acronyms to max of 4 letters only, or that will be out too!)
This news has now hit the boards in the West vs Glenelg thread. Some unhappy campers I fear...
Squawk, are you a believer in things happening for a reason?
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:19 pm
by Squawk » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:30 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:I believe you just cant express yourself sufficiently with a 2 smiley limit, 6 however, would be deemed on the wrong side of more than half the old limit![]()
Get it?
by Psyber » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:33 pm
by JK » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:37 pm
Psyber wrote:Slight problem in quoting other posts in replying to a discussion.
I had to go through and delete smileys in the other people's posts quoted before I could use one myself in my last post in the SANFL section...
That's a bit of a pain as it may modify the apparent sense of the exchange.
by JAS » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:59 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:What a waste, you had 3 more to use...![]()
Yep, smileys are in short supply, therefore, we need to place restrictions on such precious commodities![]()
Thus, the 4 smiley limit now applies..
by Dirko » Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:42 pm
by Squawk » Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:02 pm
Dutchy wrote:Save Smilies!!!
by Psyber » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:16 am
Squawk wrote:Dutchy wrote:Save Smilies!!!
In the alternative to the sweeping smilie tax, why couldn't we have instituted a smilie pollution offset trading scheme?
by Footy Chick » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:25 am
Psyber wrote:Squawk wrote:Dutchy wrote:Save Smilies!!!
In the alternative to the sweeping smilie tax, why couldn't we have instituted a smilie pollution offset trading scheme?
With adequate protective offsets until after the next election of office bearers...
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Psyber » Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:42 am
Falcon Chick wrote:Election? What election? There will be no election, this is a smiletatorshipPsyber wrote:With adequate protective offsets until after the next election of office bearers...Squawk wrote:In the alternative to the sweeping smilie tax, why couldn't we have instituted a smilie pollution offset trading scheme?Dutchy wrote:Save Smilies!!!![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |