SA Footy

whufc wrote:

Jim05 wrote:1438 in Victoria today
Looks like the protests may have contributed

Protestors to claim its a conspiracy and the government are just 'saying' protesters were positive to make them look bad. The modern world is so predictable.

The Bedge wrote:Don't know if it's been mentioned in here, but caught a bit of the news and they were saying two men from Vic were arrested and are locked up for sneaking into WA for the GF.

Two two lads spent 8 days in NT before travelling to WA.

Bloke on the news said something along the lines of "Hope these criminals feel the full force of the law for their heinous crimes."

I get that they did bad.. but **** me bit of a blow out to make them sound like they're bloody murderers or something.

Psyber wrote:

The Bedge wrote:Don't know if it's been mentioned in here, but caught a bit of the news and they were saying two men from Vic were arrested and are locked up for sneaking into WA for the GF.

Two two lads spent 8 days in NT before travelling to WA.

Bloke on the news said something along the lines of "Hope these criminals feel the full force of the law for their heinous crimes."

I get that they did bad.. but **** me bit of a blow out to make them sound like they're bloody murderers or something.

Well, if they had spread the virus to some people unvaccinated or otherwise fragile they may have killed them...
That's at least something like "negligent homicide".

Brodlach wrote:We get a COVID case today

Truck driver in his 20’s

daysofourlives wrote:https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm

Here we go for those who don't want to get vaccinated start at point (101).
There is no legal standing for an employer to make anyone get vaccinated. It also makes a very good point, vaccination status means nothing as you can still catch and spread.
It talks about it not being the only option, the better option if it's really about health and safety and for employers to workplace safety compliance etc would be to have the rapid antigen testing which gives a result with in 15 minutes. This was made in Australia and has been widely used overseas, probably for close to a year now, but it still hasn't got TGA approval in Australia, now why would that be?

daysofourlives wrote:https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm

Here we go for those who don't want to get vaccinated start at point (101).
There is no legal standing for an employer to make anyone get vaccinated. It also makes a very good point, vaccination status means nothing as you can still catch and spread.
It talks about it not being the only option, the better option if it's really about health and safety and for employers to workplace safety compliance etc would be to have the rapid antigen testing which gives a result with in 15 minutes. This was made in Australia and has been widely used overseas, probably for close to a year now, but it still hasn't got TGA approval in Australia, now why would that be?

daysofourlives wrote:https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm

Here we go for those who don't want to get vaccinated start at point (101).
There is no legal standing for an employer to make anyone get vaccinated.

mal wrote:This idiot walked around Arndale Shopping Centre today without a mask on
The most disappointing thing was not one person told me off

RB wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm

Here we go for those who don't want to get vaccinated start at point (101).
There is no legal standing for an employer to make anyone get vaccinated.

The bit you are referring to is the dissenting decision.

I.e. there were 3 people on the Commission, and a majority (i.e. the other 2) disagreed with the dissenting judge.

The majority found that a vaccination direction was both lawful and reasonable, and the employee’s refusal to be vaccinated rendered her unable to perform her role safely (receptionist at aged care facility).

Of course, an employer can't make a person get vaccinated. But this decision confirms that this employer, at least, can make getting a flu vaccination a condition of employment (and terminate an employee if they refuse).

Armchair expert wrote:Craig Kelly = Apache or daisy maybe?

Corona Man wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Craig Kelly = Apache or daisy maybe?

I’d like to think both of those mentioned are paid up members of the party..

Apachebulldog wrote:

Corona Man wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Craig Kelly = Apache or daisy maybe?

I’d like to think both of those mentioned are paid up members of the party..

Nah mate the only party i am in and a paid up member is the CDFC.

After many years on this planet i have come to the conclusion that most of these so called politicians should be hanging from a gum tree bough with a nice tight noose around their necks swaying in the breeze maybe then we might have some accountability.

Booney wrote:

Apachebulldog wrote:

Corona Man wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Craig Kelly = Apache or daisy maybe?

I’d like to think both of those mentioned are paid up members of the party..

Nah mate the only party i am in and a paid up member is the CDFC.

After many years on this planet i have come to the conclusion that most of these so called politicians should be hanging from a gum tree bough with a nice tight noose around their necks swaying in the breeze maybe then we might have some accountability.

If you think they're no good at their job why don't you run as an independent in your electorate? That's the beauty of a democracy, if you don't like the direction the local member takes you can run to have the same platform.