by Mickyj » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:25 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Aug 01, 2009 6:48 am
by Psyber » Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:51 am
I agree people who are sick should take sick leave and not come in to infect others. That's part of what it is for ..Barto wrote:I dont get sick leave and this f****** bitch comes in coughing and spluttering all over me. f****** thanks, a week off with that swine thing means a grand down the tubes. Stay at home if you're sick.
by Mic » Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:22 am
by dedja » Sat Aug 01, 2009 12:25 pm
by Psyber » Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:57 pm
by Mickyj » Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:40 pm
Psyber wrote:
On the other hand an employer may be happy to recognise unused sick leave for someone known to him as a good and reliable worker and allow it to be "banked" in case of serious illness even if not obliged to under law.
by Psyber » Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:14 pm
It used to happen with small or family firms and reliable employees, but I agree that as companies get larger it gets more impersonal and more "by the book".Mickyj wrote:Would think that statement is a bit in fairy land Psyber.My employer plays everything by the book if its in the companies favour that isPsyber wrote: On the other hand an employer may be happy to recognise unused sick leave for someone known to him as a good and reliable worker and allow it to be "banked" in case of serious illness even if not obliged to under law..
If u need a sick certificate u have to produce 1 and if your casual I've seen them make a casual employee get a sick cert .And the casuals have looked at me funny when I have asked why u don't work u don't get paid!
Could that have been the issue I mentioned above - one little Hitler?Mickyj wrote:My last sick leave yes I had 2 days off (thursday friday)then went to work Monday and then had four days off.Second lot I was ordered to produce the certificate on the Wednesday. Even though it was not going to be faxed to head office until Monday morning.Of course I took it straight in was told who to hand it to, and got why did you bring this in !!
A hospital I worked in in my youth as a public doctor had a policy that you didn't need to produce a certificate for two working days off but did for more. I had a Friday and Monday off, and got my pay docked by the local finance clerk because it was 4 days in his view. I rang his boss in head office and they couriered me a cheque and chatted him, but he still insisted his was the right interpretation.Mickyj wrote:Now just wait until near the end of September (my next 10 days fall due) and I inform the same boss who demanded the cert I will be having at least 10 days sick leave with a knee operation.Partly due to the fact that I kept going back to work when I should have stayed home.Guilt got to me as it was stock take week .Oh and the Monday I worked 10 hours and every hour my walking got slower and slower(yes the brown noses noticed and made fun of me trying to get out of work even though I didnt ask to go home until Tuesday morning).
And why September well thats the public health system and another topic
by Mickyj » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:19 pm
by Pottsy » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:20 pm
by Psyber » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:17 am
Yes.. I guess they are aware of the long weekend "sickie" being the most common.Mickyj wrote:You see you would have had to have a certifacte at my work Friday's and monday's need certificatespsyber wrote: A hospital I worked in in my youth as a public doctor had a policy that you didn't need to produce a certificate for two working days off but did for more. I had a Friday and Monday off, and got my pay docked by the local finance clerk because it was 4 days in his view. I rang his boss in head office and they couriered me a cheque and chatted him, but he still insisted his was the right interpretation.
When one of my colleagues later did the same, I wrote the clerk a note in my position as the guy making the doctors rosters up pointing out that Dr X was sick in Friday and Monday, but has contacted me on Saturday and resumed his normal duties for Saturday and Sunday, "which were rostered off duty". That stopped him playing silly bugger again.
by auto » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:25 pm
by Mickyj » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:10 pm
automaticwicky wrote:I work at a large manufacturer and the nazis are always on your back about your sickies because it doesnt meet thier targets. FFs you get 10 sickies a year but they only budget for 5 or 6 per person. Sometimes after only a couple you get a "friendly" chat which is in my eyes intimidation. The general view is if everyone only had 5 or 6 the need for 10 in the ensuing agreement can be reduced to 8 or so.
by Jimmy_041 » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:44 pm
wycbloods wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Sacked a person today that thought they were an entitlement........................
Well done. TOOL![]()
.
by Farmy » Mon Aug 03, 2009 1:47 am
by Dutchy » Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:46 am
Psyber wrote:
People who purchase companies are understandably reluctant to also take on sick leave liabilities given the way, sick leave is commonly abused.
On the other hand an employer may be happy to recognise unused sick leave for someone known to him as a good and reliable worker and allow it to be "banked" in case of serious illness even if not obliged to under law.
by Dirko » Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:13 am
by Johnny Bowla » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:54 pm
by Wedgie » Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:32 pm
Johnny Bowla wrote:I work with a fair few people that come to work sick, in an indoor environment. Gives you the shits when you catch what they have.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Iron Fist » Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |