The Sleeping Giant wrote:Are gingers a race? If yes, then I am racist.
It's ok. The Sun prevents them from attempting any kind of take over of the rest of us.
Morning Gingernuts.

by Booney » Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:08 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Are gingers a race? If yes, then I am racist.
by Gingernuts » Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:15 am
Booney wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Are gingers a race? If yes, then I am racist.
It's ok. The Sun prevents them from attempting any kind of take over of the rest of us.
Morning Gingernuts.
by therisingblues » Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:00 pm
Wedgie wrote:Crikey Yetti, reading some of your post I thought you lived in Germany in Nazi times. It's scarey how not that long ago in this country we had similar ideals to Hitler but it is also very encouraging how far we've come and so quickly.
Personally I'd like to see a new flag and Australia Day moved to January 1. It's funny that the only date we celebrate Australia day is the anniversary of when the only non peaceful folk came to our great country and how the only other flag on our flag is that of the only country who came here using force.
Australia is a multi cultural country represented by people from all over the world. It's time we celebrated our country and not that of the only one that invaded our country by force IMHO. Until we grow up as a country and do that we will probably be seen as immature and racist by others and who could blame them?
Just my opinion and not a pom bashing exercise as in the poms favour when they invaded our country it was the accepted way of aquiring new land by most European nations.
by Mr66 » Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:24 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:30 pm
therisingblues wrote:Wedgie wrote:Crikey Yetti, reading some of your post I thought you lived in Germany in Nazi times. It's scarey how not that long ago in this country we had similar ideals to Hitler but it is also very encouraging how far we've come and so quickly.
Personally I'd like to see a new flag and Australia Day moved to January 1. It's funny that the only date we celebrate Australia day is the anniversary of when the only non peaceful folk came to our great country and how the only other flag on our flag is that of the only country who came here using force.
Australia is a multi cultural country represented by people from all over the world. It's time we celebrated our country and not that of the only one that invaded our country by force IMHO. Until we grow up as a country and do that we will probably be seen as immature and racist by others and who could blame them?
Just my opinion and not a pom bashing exercise as in the poms favour when they invaded our country it was the accepted way of aquiring new land by most European nations.
I'm not so sure that they were the only non-peaceful folk to have arrived in Australia. I remember reading stories that the indigenous population did from time to time have wars between themselves, long before the English of even the Dutch arrived in Australia. This is the same as any group of people whether they be Celts, Aztecs, Arabs, Romans, Japanese, Tongans or whatever.
Invasion wasn't confined to Europeans either. In fact if the Mongol Khan hadn't died while part of his army was wiping out Hungary it is a real possibility that Europe would have been completely sacked by the Mongol empire. Zulu history was the story of a small tribe that overwhelmed everyone around them in a very short, blood-thirsty period of time. Obviously there were many cultures outside of Europe that believed that invasion was an acceptable way to acquire land.
I am not saying that any of this justifies what transpired in Australia, but it is better to keep it in perspective. Invasion and war is a human thing, not a specifically white thing. The wrongs committed against the Aboriginal people were inflicted by a group that was no different than any other group on Earth, white, black or yellow, save that they were more advanced.
Apart from all that, I quite agree that the Australian flag should represent more of Australia than a Union Jack sitting next to the Southern Cross. Australia Day should also be moved away from January 26th, as I am sure that it is a day to be mourned by the aboriginal peoples of Australia. Perhaps it could be moved to March 19th (currently Canberra Day)?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Punk Rooster » Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:58 pm
Wedgie wrote:My point was they were the only mob to invade Australia violently, when the Aboriginals came here noone else was here and relatively speaking they are one of the most peaceful races in the world.
Crikey, have a look at the way we treat peaceful boat people and the paranoia,
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by therisingblues » Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:15 am
Wedgie wrote:therisingblues wrote:Wedgie wrote:Crikey Yetti, reading some of your post I thought you lived in Germany in Nazi times. It's scarey how not that long ago in this country we had similar ideals to Hitler but it is also very encouraging how far we've come and so quickly.
Personally I'd like to see a new flag and Australia Day moved to January 1. It's funny that the only date we celebrate Australia day is the anniversary of when the only non peaceful folk came to our great country and how the only other flag on our flag is that of the only country who came here using force.
Australia is a multi cultural country represented by people from all over the world. It's time we celebrated our country and not that of the only one that invaded our country by force IMHO. Until we grow up as a country and do that we will probably be seen as immature and racist by others and who could blame them?
Just my opinion and not a pom bashing exercise as in the poms favour when they invaded our country it was the accepted way of aquiring new land by most European nations.
I'm not so sure that they were the only non-peaceful folk to have arrived in Australia. I remember reading stories that the indigenous population did from time to time have wars between themselves, long before the English of even the Dutch arrived in Australia. This is the same as any group of people whether they be Celts, Aztecs, Arabs, Romans, Japanese, Tongans or whatever.
Invasion wasn't confined to Europeans either. In fact if the Mongol Khan hadn't died while part of his army was wiping out Hungary it is a real possibility that Europe would have been completely sacked by the Mongol empire. Zulu history was the story of a small tribe that overwhelmed everyone around them in a very short, blood-thirsty period of time. Obviously there were many cultures outside of Europe that believed that invasion was an acceptable way to acquire land.
I am not saying that any of this justifies what transpired in Australia, but it is better to keep it in perspective. Invasion and war is a human thing, not a specifically white thing. The wrongs committed against the Aboriginal people were inflicted by a group that was no different than any other group on Earth, white, black or yellow, save that they were more advanced.
Apart from all that, I quite agree that the Australian flag should represent more of Australia than a Union Jack sitting next to the Southern Cross. Australia Day should also be moved away from January 26th, as I am sure that it is a day to be mourned by the aboriginal peoples of Australia. Perhaps it could be moved to March 19th (currently Canberra Day)?
My point was they were the only mob to invade Australia violently, when the Aboriginals came here noone else was here and relatively speaking they are one of the most peaceful races in the world, plus I don't think the Mongols or Zulu's quite made it here either!
The Aboriginals came here when no other race was here, those who came out in the 50s and onwards (and before) were all invited. Only mob to invade this country violently and who were unwelcome were the mob we celebrate on our flag and the day we choose for Australia Day, seems the last mob we should be celebrating, not the first. Crikey, have a look at the way we treat peaceful boat people and the paranoia, that's nothing compared to a whole country violently invading and taking over our country! The country will always seem immature to others and racist from many whilst we continue this practice.
by Wedgie » Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:48 am
therisingblues wrote:Just a question relating to your last point. What do you think we should do with boat people?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Barto » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:00 am
Wedgie wrote:
My point was they were the only mob to invade Australia violently, when the Aboriginals came here noone else was here and relatively speaking they are one of the most peaceful races in the world, plus I don't think the Mongols or Zulu's quite made it here either!
The Aboriginals came here when no other race was here, those who came out in the 50s and onwards (and before) were all invited. Only mob to invade this country violently and who were unwelcome were the mob we celebrate on our flag and the day we choose for Australia Day, seems the last mob we should be celebrating, not the first. Crikey, have a look at the way we treat peaceful boat people and the paranoia, that's nothing compared to a whole country violently invading and taking over our country! The country will always seem immature to others and racist from many whilst we continue this practice.
by mick » Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:36 am
by Psyber » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:34 am
While I support the view that we should do more about the health and welfare of our "aborigines", I think there are certain PC myths about about their allegedly peaceful nature and their alleged role as "Custodians of the Land" that need challenging, if only because those myths cause antagonism and impair the process of reconciliation. I am sympathetic to the idea of moving the Australia Day celebrations to a date other than "Invasion Day", as a gesture of good will, but I don't think that in doing so we should allow it to imply this was the only ever "invasion" of this continent.mick wrote:I think it is accepted that the original occupation of Australia occurred in waves and the later arrivals had better weaponry were bigger etc than the earlier arrivals and the earlier people were pushed into Tasmania. I think it is drawing a long bow to suggest that aboriginal people did not go to war against other aboriginal people for land/women/game etc. They are human beings afflicted with the same shortcomings as the rest of the human race. Humans are an aggressive species that's why they dominate the globe.
by (S)aintbackline » Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:37 am
by therisingblues » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:10 pm
(S)aintbackline wrote:Well i think its pretty obvious we are Racist, just look at that KFC Ad that got pulled! who knew that West Indians didnt like free fried chicken!
Dam do-gooders ruin everything, like the Black Face Sketch it was just harmless fun, maybe us Whiteys should have made a fuss about the movie White Chicks.
Its the same for Black Comics they say N**ger every 2 seconds and thats ok its, but if a White Person said it there would be hell to pay (except Eminem), Black people can call us whatever they want is a ******* double standard.
by Bum Crack » Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:45 pm
by Barto » Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:57 pm
Bum Crack wrote:I heard some bird on the news today having a go at us for not accepting a certain group of people who entered Australia ILLEGALLY. She said that we should be accepting this group of people because THEY HAVE CHOSEN OUR COUNTRY TO LIVE. Pigs arse. You do it the proper way, or no way. I know some people will go off at me for that, but that's my view.
by Bum Crack » Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:59 pm
Barto wrote:Bum Crack wrote:I heard some bird on the news today having a go at us for not accepting a certain group of people who entered Australia ILLEGALLY. She said that we should be accepting this group of people because THEY HAVE CHOSEN OUR COUNTRY TO LIVE. Pigs arse. You do it the proper way, or no way. I know some people will go off at me for that, but that's my view.
I've often heard of these 'queue jumpers', does anyone actually know where this 'queue' is that people can get on the back of?
by dedja » Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:01 pm
by cripple » Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:49 pm
Bum Crack wrote:Barto wrote:Bum Crack wrote:I heard some bird on the news today having a go at us for not accepting a certain group of people who entered Australia ILLEGALLY. She said that we should be accepting this group of people because THEY HAVE CHOSEN OUR COUNTRY TO LIVE. Pigs arse. You do it the proper way, or no way. I know some people will go off at me for that, but that's my view.
I've often heard of these 'queue jumpers', does anyone actually know where this 'queue' is that people can get on the back of?
It would be the same queue that the rest of the immigrants are on that do it the proper way.
by dedja » Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:14 pm
cripple wrote:Is that the same queue that thousands of european backpackers and tourists who visit on a visa join when they decide not to go home. Most people only care about the boat people because the news and pollies make a big deal of it. the rate of illegal immigrants coming into australia as tourists far outweighs the numbers coming in boats
by Leaping Lindner » Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:42 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |