SA Footy

I don't understand people who are given information in confidence, then proceed to spray it all around a public forum..

Barto wrote:I don't understand people who are given information in confidence, then proceed to spray it all around a public forum..

I've often wondered why as well ...

dedja wrote:

Barto wrote:I don't understand people who are given information in confidence, then proceed to spray it all around a public forum..

I've often wondered why as well ...

So us commoners on SA Footy have something to read

tipper wrote:one could also argue that the current penalty, imprisonment, also doesnt rehabilitate, yet that is the current practice, and eventually lets these scum back into society.

Perhaps if prisons were actually returned to places of hard labour and abhorrent conditions as opposed to the virtual hotels they are at the minute, then it might be a deterrent.

and don't anyone bother coming back with "prisoners rights" It's an oxymoron - they're in prison, they're not supposed to have any rights...

Footy Chick wrote:

Perhaps if prisons were actually returned to places of hard labour and abhorrent conditions as opposed to the virtual hotels they are at the minute

Which one of our prisons in SA could you possibly be talking about?

redden whites wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

Perhaps if prisons were actually returned to places of hard labour and abhorrent conditions as opposed to the virtual hotels they are at the minute

Which one of our prisons in SA could you possibly be talking about?

think FC means that prisoners have sort of a luxury in their cells. I know this at Yatala for a fact going in there and changing the prisoner phones. They have TVs and xboxs/playstations in their rooms that i saw for my self. All with shoot em up games i might point out. You think they would have G rated games but they have M rated shoot em up and a phone was next to a room and one of the prisoners told me he plays call of duty .

Facebook/Twitter etc...really "social media" in general

Footy Chick wrote:

tipper wrote:one could also argue that the current penalty, imprisonment, also doesnt rehabilitate, yet that is the current practice, and eventually lets these scum back into society.

Perhaps if prisons were actually returned to places of hard labour and abhorrent conditions as opposed to the virtual hotels they are at the minute, then it might be a deterrent.

and don't anyone bother coming back with "prisoners rights" It's an oxymoron - they're in prison, they're not supposed to have any rights...

You'd have a fit over here at the mo FC. They're campainging for the right to vote whilst in prison....I mean WTF

Regards
JAS

brod wrote:Facebook/Twitter etc...really "social media" in general

SA Footy in that Brod??

Barto wrote:I don't understand people who are given information in confidence, then proceed to spray it all around a public forum..

COMMANDER BARTO, if that is directed mainly at me, i always ask whether i can post it first & as you know i pm'd you a while back & told you to expect an announcement within the next week or so & seeing i couldn't trust you i couldn't tell you & was told not to post it & for those reading it was unley ovals new name which was announced 3 or 4 days after the pm to commander barto

I thought I saw Andrew Symonds lining up for the All Star Rugby Game!

southee wrote:

brod wrote:Facebook/Twitter etc...really "social media" in general

SA Footy in that Brod??

I dont really understand my obsession with it

I don't understand why so many 'kids' have their facebook profiles set to 'public' for the whole world to see??

Silly !

A Mum wrote:I don't understand why so many 'kids' have their facebook profiles set to 'public' for the whole world to see??

Silly !

Because the 'attention seeking' part of their brain totally overrules any comprehension of the potential risks...silly indeed.

Regards
JAS

How cooking spray is flammable, it's kind of like soap being intolerant to water

JAS wrote:

A Mum wrote:I don't understand why so many 'kids' have their facebook profiles set to 'public' for the whole world to see??

Silly !

Because the 'attention seeking' part of their brain totally overrules any comprehension of the potential risks...silly indeed.

Regards
JAS

It is silly...

In this household the 'mother will kill me' must override the 'attention seeking' part of the brain

A Mum wrote:

JAS wrote:

A Mum wrote:I don't understand why so many 'kids' have their facebook profiles set to 'public' for the whole world to see??

Silly !

Because the 'attention seeking' part of their brain totally overrules any comprehension of the potential risks...silly indeed.

Regards
JAS

It is silly...

In this household the 'mother will kill me' must override the 'attention seeking' part of the brain

Where's the like button?

bayman wrote:

Barto wrote:I don't understand people who are given information in confidence, then proceed to spray it all around a public forum..

COMMANDER BARTO, if that is directed mainly at me, i always ask whether i can post it first & as you know i pm'd you a while back & told you to expect an announcement within the next week or so & seeing i couldn't trust you i couldn't tell you & was told not to post it & for those reading it was unley ovals new name which was announced 3 or 4 days after the pm to commander barto

Interesting rant. In that PM you stated:

Deleted - Do not post PM's on here without permission

If it was told in confidence and you have respect for your source, why were you messaging people that you don't know with it? Why mention it on the main board anyway?

Forums like this provide a degree of anonymity to allow blokes like yourself to come out with the "ooh ooh, I know something you dont know.. get this.." when back in the day someone like yourself had inside info, you'd have been on the phone to KG and spilled it on there. The difference is, the voice wouldve been recognised by whoever would've told you and the flow of info would've dried up real quick. On here it just takes a few more weeks for people at the club to work out who you are.

dedja wrote:

FlyingHigh wrote:Why either party over the last ten years has not made a genuine commitment to ensuring by, say, 2015, all new home and small office airconditioning units have to be solar powered.

That I do understand ... let's just say the fossil fuel industry can be a tad influencial

Well, yes, perhaps I was being a little naive.
Still crap IMO.