SA Footy

thought it would be worse if they worked there

Does this mean LOCKDOWN will finish before next week ?
one would hope so

Pizza shop may get a lot of abuse now

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

MW wrote:thought it would be worse if they worked there

That’s what I thought?

Here comes Miss Nancy.................

whufc wrote:Whats the story?????

The pizza guy lied did he...…..if true that should be a jail sentence because he wont be able to afford the cost of lawsuits from businesses he should face.

Unfortunately under the act it is not an offence to lie so he cannot be charged with anything

MW wrote:yep the lie was a person claimed they bought a pizza whereas they worked there instead
if truthful, we wouldnt have gone into lockdown

I dun geddit. How does this lie reduce the risk???

Somrme restrictions easing from midnight saturday.

Schools go back Monday

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Jimmy_041 wrote:Here comes Miss Nancy.................

I’ll just whack the idiot box on if so........

Some of these journos cant speak coherent english

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Q. wrote:Am I right in suggesting that they are saying he exaggerated his contacts?

He said he ordered a pizza and the assumption was he caught the virus from the pizza box. Truth is that he was working at the pizza bar and caught rhe virus from the guy who was the security fuard at Peppers.

Q. wrote:

MW wrote:yep the lie was a person claimed they bought a pizza whereas they worked there instead
if truthful, we wouldnt have gone into lockdown

I dun geddit. How does this lie reduce the risk???

X 2

Q. wrote:

MW wrote:yep the lie was a person claimed they bought a pizza whereas they worked there instead
if truthful, we wouldnt have gone into lockdown

I dun geddit. How does this lie reduce the risk???

I'm with you

Armchair expert wrote:Feel free to say

Sorry Armchair, you were right.

Its okay, I forgive you guys.

You weren't right. You are still a dick.

Q. wrote:

MW wrote:yep the lie was a person claimed they bought a pizza whereas they worked there instead
if truthful, we wouldnt have gone into lockdown

I dun geddit. How does this lie reduce the risk???

They thought the virus had changed I guess and they thought the virus had been transferred on the pizza box rather than airborne

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

Q. wrote:Am I right in suggesting that they are saying he exaggerated his contacts?

He said he ordered a pizza and the assumption was he caught the virus from the pizza box. Truth is that he was working at the pizza bar and caught rhe virus from the guy who was the security fuard at Peppers.

So it wasn't the pineapple on the pizza?

Q. wrote:

MW wrote:yep the lie was a person claimed they bought a pizza whereas they worked there instead
if truthful, we wouldnt have gone into lockdown

I dun geddit. How does this lie reduce the risk???

Im confused as well, isn't the risk now greater if he had lied.

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Q. wrote:

MW wrote:yep the lie was a person claimed they bought a pizza whereas they worked there instead
if truthful, we wouldnt have gone into lockdown

I dun geddit. How does this lie reduce the risk???

I'm with you

Queen Spurrier will explain everything

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Some of these journos cant speak coherent english

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Thats Andrew Hough. Wait till you meet him in person

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Q. wrote:

MW wrote:yep the lie was a person claimed they bought a pizza whereas they worked there instead
if truthful, we wouldnt have gone into lockdown

I dun geddit. How does this lie reduce the risk???

I'm with you

They thought he just bought a pizza from there (there is another pizza bar worker that had COVID. So they thought if a customer could have got it, then any customer over that period might have got it and then their close contacts etc etc.

Instead he worked there as well, so it was transmitted as a close contact and there is no reason to think that any customers would have got COVID.