by Footy Chick » Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:36 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Rushby Hinds » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:05 pm
by JK » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:11 pm
by smac » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:28 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:36 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Footy Chick » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:44 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:when the other members of the group took a photo of Falcon Chick, they all noticed an asterisk appeared to be magically floating above her head...
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by smac » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:46 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:57 pm
smac wrote:'Cos you're obsessed with penguins, *chick.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Psyber » Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:21 pm
by Booney » Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:38 am
by Footy Chick » Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:35 am
Psyber wrote:No.1 looks like a duplication of the outline of the person immediately in front of it with a halo effect.
No. 2 Underexposure can do funny things to colour in low light conditions with digital cameras - that would explain the visible camera shake too.
Scepticism Rules OK?
PS; What make of camera is it a Fuji?
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Leaping Lindner » Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:26 am
by Footy Chick » Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:53 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Psyber » Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:03 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:Psyber wrote:No.1 looks like a duplication of the outline of the person immediately in front of it with a halo effect.
No. 2 Underexposure can do funny things to colour in low light conditions with digital cameras - that would explain the visible camera shake too.
Scepticism Rules OK?
PS; What make of camera is it a Fuji?
No, its a Sony.... why does the outline look like its arms are crossed then?? Did I forget to mention that all the lights were off in the house in the first photo? Look at the window on the far right...
by mick » Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:39 am
by johntheclaret » Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:54 am
Punk Rooster wrote:when the other members of the group took a photo of Falcon Chick, they all noticed an asterisk appeared to be magically floating above her head...
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:07 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:51 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:22 pm
by therisingblues » Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:34 pm
mick wrote:Theres also some sort of superimposed image (a face) on the girl in the green
bandana on the right hand side. Some sort of digital camera artifact I would say. I don't
believe in anything "paranormal" and am pretty much an atheist. Kapunda has the reputation of
being the most haunted place in Australia, and the cellar of the North Kapunda Hotel (now Sir
Sydney Kidman) the most haunted according to self styled "experts", back in the 60s I used to
play with the publican's kids in those cellars. Guess what? No ghosts, and I was bought up in
a superstitious Irish catholic backbround, educated by Irish Dominican nuns.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |