Page 1 of 1
Nicole Cornes

Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:21 pm
by Punk Rooster
Why does she exist? Hasn't she worn out the coat tails of her husband, that's she's been riding on since... year dot? Her constant sexist propaganda to ad nauseam, is generally not backed factually (if ever). The vitriol spat by this bitter twisted "columnist", could only suggest that perhaps Studley's not keeping her happy in the bed. Or not keeping her happy in the bed. I doubt we'll ever see any balanced, intelligent debate on her pages in the future. If she is the "modern woman", then that is the reason that there are so many single women out there. She should change her column title to "Enough talk about me, let's talk about me!"

Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:40 pm
by ORDoubleBlues
I've already said my piece on this subject but I do wan't to say that she must have got upset with the male columnist who writes on the back of the Thursday Advertiser "Scene" (Gig Guide).
She dedicated her column on Sunday to pointing out how wrong he was but she, as usual missed the whole point of what he said.
He commented on older women who dress like teenagers (which is fine if you have the body and confidence to so) but they end up looking like (his words) MDL's (Mutton Dressed as Lamb). She goes on to say about Elle McPherson, Cindy Crawford, Demi Moore but those women have nothing to do with what he was talking about. Plus, a lot of the women that Cornes mentioned have spent 10's of thousands of dollars on plastic surgery.

Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:05 pm
by Wedgie
I saw Cornsey today, walked past the Office when I was having a brew at lunch.
Just think if Punky had written his post a bit earlier and he knew who I was he could have saved time and just given me the law suit there and then.


Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:17 pm
by Punk Rooster
Wedgie wrote:I saw Cornsey today, walked past the Office when I was having a brew at lunch.
Just think if Punky had written his post a bit earlier and he knew who I was he could have saved time and just given me the law suit there and then.

I only felt like having this rant this afternoon. I'm sure Cornsey will have plenty of time to sue you!
Yes ORDB, I've given her a spray once before, but reading about her belittling comments on Mr (or Master?) Henderson got me semi-fired up again. I think his reply was classic- Just call me Nick! Hopefully she gets off her soapbox now, at least for one week.

Posted:
Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:59 am
by ORDoubleBlues
Had to laugh at a column she did about a month ago saying about how she saw these two "hot guys" at a cafe who had "great bodies" but how she was turned off when she saw what "wussy meals" they were eating (salads from memory). Well HELLO, that's the reason they have their "great bodies".

Posted:
Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:05 pm
by Interceptor
Everyone (with half a brain) who has lived in Adelaide knows what a joke the Advertiser/Mail are.
They certainly don't help their cause by employing so-called "modern women" like Cornes.
Do they still give a page of the the Friday Footy liftout to Carly Whats-her-name? (Clarke's chick).
What a complete waste of space her crap was.


Posted:
Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:41 pm
by spell_check
I wouldn't wipe my arse with trash like that. These types of columnist should be confined to Womens Monthly and New Idea.

Posted:
Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:34 pm
by duncs7
Interceptor wrote:Do they still give a page of the the Friday Footy liftout to Carly Whats-her-name? (Clarke's chick).
What a complete waste of space her crap was.

She got her boost to fame

off Clarkes back so now she has dumped him. Stoopid Bimbo.
Only thing i like about the tisers footy sections is some interesting statistics and figures(how accurate they are is a another thing) Teams etc. The odd story is good too, dont mind some of Andy Capels work dont bother reading that ninja turtles stuff.
Dale Lewis' page is crap and self centered.
And as much as we all bitch about the tiser we all still read it so we can see how bad it is, so they have no pressure to change what they re doing.

Posted:
Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:49 pm
by Wedgie
Simone ex-Warne is another classic.
Somehow manage to get famous just for rooting someone famous.
FFS.

Posted:
Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:06 pm
by Ian
Wedgie wrote:Simone ex-Warne is another classic.
Somehow manage to get famous just for rooting someone famous.
FFS.
Or the sympathy vote for being screwed over by someone famous

Posted:
Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:44 pm
by stan
The tiser has really gone down hill in recent years. Basically turning the paper into a bitchy gosip mag at best. The way this has happened is in the recuritment. You get "columinsits" like nicole cornes, rebeka delvin and say Wilson, then well you what your going to get. Now im not saying all female journos are like this. As there are some excellent females around that write brillant work, but the problem is the controverial ones stand out, and thats why the tiser has them.

Posted:
Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:02 pm
by duncs7
stan wrote:The tiser has really gone down hill in recent years. Basically turning the paper into a bitchy gosip mag at best. The way this has happened is in the recuritment. You get "columinsits" like nicole cornes, rebeka delvin and say Wilson, then well you what your going to get. Now im not saying all female journos are like this. As there are some excellent females around that write brillant work, but the problem is the controverial ones stand out, and thats why the tiser has them.
U forgot to mention the quality work of Genevieve Meegan..
Can someone tell me why Neil Craig being seen with the family having lunch in Stirling can make the news????
Or why Brogan with mrs and kid strolling down the street needs to be mentioned????
Who is this ugly bimbo and why does she get 2 pages in the mail?

Posted:
Mon Jul 03, 2006 5:28 am
by Magpiespower
stan wrote:The tiser has really gone down hill in recent years.
Can pinpoint the year - 1992.
And the demise of that other salacious rag 'The News.'
Re: Nicole Cornes

Posted:
Mon Jul 03, 2006 7:47 am
by Ian
Punk Rooster wrote:Why does she exist?
C_M B_ _ _ _T for Graham

Posted:
Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:19 am
by Maddogmike
u lads r jealous ur wives or gfs arent decent looking.

Posted:
Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:41 am
by Punk Rooster
Maddogmike wrote:u lads r jealous ur wives or gfs arent decent looking.
surely you jest?
Try reading the drivel that is written (allegedly) each week.

Posted:
Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:35 pm
by bayman
i've met her (nc) & she is so far up herself it doesn't matter, i wouldn't even bother reading it. & your right grab a celebrity & then take half a few years later as 2 former crows players know only too well

Posted:
Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:19 pm
by ORDoubleBlues
duncs7 wrote: U forgot to mention the quality work of Genevieve Meegan..
Remember being disgusted that she felt the need last year to report about a couple (who for some reason were getting the sympathy vote just because their dog was wreaking havock all over the place) who just had a child. Of course, what she doesn't tell us is that the bloke concerned is an absolute d******d who has a criminal record a mile long.
Bayman, know what you're saying but I think some of these blokes kid themselves if they think the woman is in it for them. At least that's the one advantage of not having money or celebrity, it keeps it real
As for Ali Carle, she can rest assured that someone like Matthew Clarke won't exactly struggle to pick up something else.

Posted:
Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:02 pm
by Punk Rooster
ORDoubleBlues wrote:duncs7 wrote: U forgot to mention the quality work of Genevieve Meegan..
Remember being disgusted that she felt the need last year to report about a couple (who for some reason were getting the sympathy vote just because their dog was wreaking havock all over the place) who just had a child. Of course, what she doesn't tell us is that the bloke concerned is an absolute d******d who has a criminal record a mile long.
Care to offer any more info?? PM me if you must...
odb

Posted:
Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:29 am
by bayman
i do not know what or who you mean can you elaborate please ?(meegan)