SA Footy

Passive smoking linked to dementia 20 Feb 2009 - British Medical Journal 2009;338:b462

Passive smoking appears to be associated with increased odds of developing cognitive impairment, a study finds.
Published in the British Medical Journal the study found that people with high levels of salivary continine – a biomarker for recent exposure to second hand smoke – were more likely to be cognitively impaired than those exposed to little or no second hand smoke (OR 1.44). Cognitive impairment was defined by the lowest 10% of scores on a battery of neuropsychological tests.

When the people were divided into quintiles according to continine levels the risk increased with each increased level of continine, and the risk was highest for those people who had never smoked but were exposed to the highest levels of second hand smoke (OR1.70). In an editorial about the research, the University of California’s Mark D. Eisner said that the evidence of an exposure-response gradient between continine concentration and cognitive impairment increases the likelihood that the association is a causal one.

Because cognitive impairment develops over many years, the ideal metric to measure exposure would be one that captures cumulative lifetime exposure, he said. He added that publicity of the suspected link between smoking and dementia may resonate powerfully with the public and increase awareness of the harms of passive smoking.

hate the smell of smoking. worst is when you are down wind. best thing they ever did was ban those disgraceful parents who smoke with their children in the car"even tho they have their window down a little bit"

ill admit, im a smoker.

but im all for the no smoking in pubs (makes going out so much more enjoyable), not with children in the car (what brain-dead lowlifes would do this anyway?), and most definately making sure you are not blowing your second-hand smoke into someones face. (i even hate others blowing smoke in my face)

i figure if im stupid enough to have such a filthy habit, i have the responsibility to not make other people suffer.

I might take up smoking again, sounds like its better to be a smoker rather than a passive smoker.
Cool!

Wedgie wrote:I might take up smoking again, sounds like its better to be a smoker rather than a passive smoker.
Cool!

Smoker - Die from Cancer.

Passive smoker - Die from Cancer but not know it because you have dementia.

Im going with the cognitively impaired group.

People don't like it when I don't smoke.... apparently I get angry

Footy Chick wrote:People don't like it when I don't smoke.... apparently I get angry

Yeah but how much will smoking fix that anyway? (*runs*)

Dog_ger wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/03/health/research/03smoke.html

From that article:

Among the substances in third-hand smoke are hydrogen cyanide, used in chemical weapons; butane, which is used in lighter fluid; toluene, found in paint thinners; arsenic; lead; carbon monoxide; and even polonium-210, the highly radioactive carcinogen that was used to murder former Russian spy Alexander V. Litvinenko in 2006. Eleven of the compounds are highly carcinogenic.

Unbelievable really what cigarette manufacturers can get away with in their toxic products.

If the current federal government are truly serious about health care, they'll produce a plan to phase out tobacco as a legal consumer product.
Obviously it would create a tax revenue hole, but large savings in health costs are possible further down the track.

Id assume that the tax revenue from tobacco would far outway that of the tobacco related health costs.

i dont thinking phasing it out as a legal consumer product is going to help.

havent you heard of the age old saying "you always want what you cant have"?

makes you wonder if doing drugs (marijuana for example) in australia would be such an "in" thing to do if they legalised it.

One health system for smokers, funded by them.

One health system for non smokers, funded by the Federal Government.

whatcha got there? wrote:i dont thinking phasing it out as a legal consumer product is going to help.

havent you heard of the age old saying "you always want what you cant have"?

makes you wonder if doing drugs (marijuana for example) in australia would be such an "in" thing to do if they legalised it.

Spot on WGT...there is already a huge trade in fake ciggies around the world...people would just buy them 'off the back of a lorry' etc.

You've no idea the hell I'm having trying not to start again at the moment...after giving up 5 years ago I'd kill for a packet right now thank god for ice cream.

Regards
JAS

JAS wrote:

whatcha got there? wrote:i dont thinking phasing it out as a legal consumer product is going to help.

havent you heard of the age old saying "you always want what you cant have"?

makes you wonder if doing drugs (marijuana for example) in australia would be such an "in" thing to do if they legalised it.

Spot on WGT...there is already a huge trade in fake ciggies around the world...people would just buy them 'off the back of a lorry' etc.

I take your points, but I'd happily see cigarettes 'go underground' if it meant I could walk around public places not having to inhale that putrid, toxic crap

In 1983 I did a survey on how many women lit up a smoke after sex with me.
238 did
123 did not

panther wrote:In 1983 I did a survey on how many women lit up a smoke after sex with me.
238 did
123 did not

That sounds about right, I know I'd need a smoke after suffering through such extreme trauma

Footy Chick wrote:

panther wrote:In 1983 I did a survey on how many women lit up a smoke after sex with me.
238 did
123 did not

That sounds about right, I know I'd need a smoke after suffering through such extreme trauma

My nickname was Benson and Hedges," When only ........

JAS wrote:

whatcha got there? wrote:i dont thinking phasing it out as a legal consumer product is going to help.

havent you heard of the age old saying "you always want what you cant have"?

makes you wonder if doing drugs (marijuana for example) in australia would be such an "in" thing to do if they legalised it.

Spot on WGT...there is already a huge trade in fake ciggies around the world...people would just buy them 'off the back of a lorry' etc.

You've no idea the hell I'm having trying not to start again at the moment...after giving up 5 years ago I'd kill for a packet right now thank god for ice cream.

Regards
JAS

well done JAS, keep at it!! its harder than non-smokers think. I quit for like 4 months, but discovered i had to quit drinking alcohol as well (the two seem to go hand in hand). the next time i had a drink...back to the drawing board.

i figure i will quit when im ready. there's no point trying to do something when your hearts not in it!


ps. i recommend the fruity mentos everytime you get a craving!

panther wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

panther wrote:In 1983 I did a survey on how many women lit up a smoke after sex with me.
238 did
123 did not

That sounds about right, I know I'd need a smoke after suffering through such extreme trauma

My nickname was Benson and Hedges," When only ........

I thought it was Victa....2 stroke.

Booney wrote:

panther wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

panther wrote:In 1983 I did a survey on how many women lit up a smoke after sex with me.
238 did
123 did not

That sounds about right, I know I'd need a smoke after suffering through such extreme trauma

My nickname was Benson and Hedges," When only ........

I thought it was Victa....2 stroke.

I was going to suggest his nickname was Claytons.

The **** your having when your not having a ****