by Gozu » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:38 pm
by Gingernuts » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:47 pm
Gozu wrote:The religious extremists continue their draconian fight against the rest of us, movies like Mad Max, Robocop & The Terminator will now be found in the soft porn section of video stores and retailers:
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html
by Footy Chick » Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:22 pm
by heater31 » Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:28 pm
by fish » Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:07 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:54 am
by Gozu » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:07 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:So, which one of the major parties supported it?
Family First could not have done it without the support of one of the major parties
by Magpiespower » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:40 am
by MatteeG » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:57 am
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:39 am
Gozu wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:So, which one of the major parties supported it?
Family First could not have done it without the support of one of the major parties
There was this at comment #63:
"The new law was supported by everyone in Parliament: Family First, Labor, Liberal, Greens, Xenophonites. No-one spoke against it. Contrary to comment 23 of 33, other States have this law, so the franchisors don't have any difficulty with it, having adapted easily in the other jurisdictions. Comment 16 of 33 "Nazi-Australia" must have grown up in blissful ignorance of history or what it is like to live under National Socialism or some other totalitarian regime.
Posted by: Michael Atkinson of Croydon 2:34pm today"
by fish » Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:19 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Surely all the video shops have to do is have an R Rated section and not put with the "R" porn movies? I'd do it just to stuff fish up
by fisho mcspaz » Mon Jan 18, 2010 4:01 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:45 pm
by Sojourner » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:40 pm
Gozu wrote:The religious extremists continue their draconian fight against the rest of us, movies like Mad Max, Robocop & The Terminator will now be found in the soft porn section of video stores and retailers:
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html
by Brodlach » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:18 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Just out of interest, does anyone know - was there a requirement for the video shops to put the blueys in their own separate section or did they just do it?
After all, they were only "R" as well (or so fish tells me)
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:33 pm
Brodlach wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Just out of interest, does anyone know - was there a requirement for the video shops to put the blueys in their own separate section or did they just do it?
After all, they were only "R" as well (or so fish tells me)
Yes it was a legal requirement.
I am in the industry and it is a totally ridiculous law. Covers are only allowed to be of either G or PG standard as it is. Movie called the Hanover which is R-Rated has a picture of three blokes and a baby.....hardly anyhting to be offended by.That is the norm...not the exception. Rental has suffered on theses titles since they have been moved.
Typical that the minority rules the majority.
by godoubleblues » Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:28 pm
Brodlach wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Just out of interest, does anyone know - was there a requirement for the video shops to put the blueys in their own separate section or did they just do it?
After all, they were only "R" as well (or so fish tells me)
Yes it was a legal requirement.
I am in the industry and it is a totally ridiculous law. Covers are only allowed to be of either G or PG standard as it is. Movie called the Hanover which is R-Rated has a picture of three blokes and a baby.....hardly anyhting to be offended by.That is the norm...not the exception. Rental has suffered on theses titles since they have been moved.
Typical that the minority rules the majority.
by Gozu » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:41 pm
Sojourner wrote:Gozu wrote:The religious extremists continue their draconian fight against the rest of us, movies like Mad Max, Robocop & The Terminator will now be found in the soft porn section of video stores and retailers:
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html
Any mail Gozu on why the Greens then voted in favour of the idea?
by Gozu » Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:43 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Brodlach wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Just out of interest, does anyone know - was there a requirement for the video shops to put the blueys in their own separate section or did they just do it?
After all, they were only "R" as well (or so fish tells me)
Yes it was a legal requirement.
I am in the industry and it is a totally ridiculous law. Covers are only allowed to be of either G or PG standard as it is. Movie called the Hanover which is R-Rated has a picture of three blokes and a baby.....hardly anyhting to be offended by.That is the norm...not the exception. Rental has suffered on theses titles since they have been moved.
Typical that the minority rules the majority.
According to Gozu, the entire Parliament voted for it (or I think he said that)
by Strawb » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:58 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |