Spargo wrote:What if it was for defamation of character?
did someone accuse you of being a crows supporter or something?
by tipper » Fri Nov 01, 2019 10:13 am
Spargo wrote:What if it was for defamation of character?
by amber_fluid » Fri Nov 01, 2019 10:26 am
tipper wrote:Spargo wrote:What if it was for defamation of character?
did someone accuse you of being a crows supporter or something?
by RB » Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:36 am
Again it depends what the compensation is based on, but with defamation, particularly at the relatively low level, it's highly likely to be damages for pain and suffering and thus doesn't need to be included in your tax return.Spargo wrote:What if it was for defamation of character?
by LMA » Sat Nov 02, 2019 9:05 am
tipper wrote:Spargo wrote:What if it was for defamation of character?
did someone accuse you of being a crows supporter or something?
by Brodlach » Thu Nov 07, 2019 7:59 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by The Dark Knight » Sat Nov 09, 2019 7:52 pm
by Dutchy » Sat Nov 09, 2019 9:56 pm
by The Dark Knight » Sat Nov 09, 2019 10:17 pm
I'm assuming that's what's happened, it has been mentioned that the competition they're in doesn't do permits, therefore unofficial consent would be the only option? We have to find out.Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt have thought so unless the league gave him unofficial consent to play with the clearance to be sorted out during the week
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Nov 10, 2019 8:44 am
The Dark Knight wrote:I'm assuming that's what's happened, it has been mentioned that the competition they're in doesn't do permits, therefore unofficial consent would be the only option? We have to find out.Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt have thought so unless the league gave him unofficial consent to play with the clearance to be sorted out during the week
by daysofourlives » Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:08 am
The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
by The Dark Knight » Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:16 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I'm assuming that's what's happened, it has been mentioned that the competition they're in doesn't do permits, therefore unofficial consent would be the only option? We have to find out.Dutchy wrote:Wouldnt have thought so unless the league gave him unofficial consent to play with the clearance to be sorted out during the week
Is he playing a two dayer or one dayer.
I had a similar issue last month, my son was cleared from one club to another in a different comp without us filling out any forms or making any formal commitment, he trained once at the club that put the clearance in.
by The Dark Knight » Sun Nov 10, 2019 9:21 am
daysofourlives wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
Every comp has different rules.
In mine they would lose all their points and the assoc wouldn't even entertain a permit if the clearance had been denied
by LMA » Sun Nov 10, 2019 11:40 am
The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
by The Dark Knight » Sun Nov 10, 2019 11:41 am
Not Port Districts.LMA wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
So who left for Districts?
by LMA » Sun Nov 10, 2019 11:44 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Not Port Districts.LMA wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
So who left for Districts?
by The Dark Knight » Sun Nov 10, 2019 11:51 am
LMA wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Not Port Districts.LMA wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
So who left for Districts?
You still at Havens then?
by gadj1976 » Sun Nov 10, 2019 7:15 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
by The Dark Knight » Sun Nov 10, 2019 7:31 pm
gadj1976 wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
TDK, I'd be advising the association, who will immediately revoke their points for the game. Time to be tough on these imbeciles.
by Booney » Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:03 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:52 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Not Port Districts.LMA wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:I have cricket related clearance question.
We had a disgruntled player leave our club this week, joining a neighbouring club. They put in a clearance for him but we denied it as he is unfinancial after not paying he fees last season. He played for his new club today (I found out after he posted a photo on his Snapchat story) despite not being cleared from us and was not named on MyCricket (they only had 10 named) so I'm assuming he is unregistered for them at the moment? Would of they been able to have a permit or temporary transfer granted for him despite having his clearance denied by us? And therefore hs he still allowed to play for them in today's match?
So who left for Districts?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |