SA Footy

Lightning McQueen wrote:

JK wrote:Lots of (separate) mates lately been talking about how they share the cost of Foxtel (ie, 1 account holder rents additional boxes - Boxes then disseminated amongst the group and all pay an equal share of the total monthly bill).

Anyone here have "acquaintances" doing the same? Is it easy enough to get away with? (asking for a friend)

I'm not doing it at the moment but it's easy as, as long as you have a foxtel outlet in your wall.

One person gets multi room, the others use that persons extra boxes at their houses, untraceable.

Or you can just use someones login for the Foxtel streaming service. Mrs HH3 used her mums up until her death, and now uses her sisters mother in laws.

It doesn't effect the account holder if they use it or not.

And no hardware requirements.

HH3 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

JK wrote:Lots of (separate) mates lately been talking about how they share the cost of Foxtel (ie, 1 account holder rents additional boxes - Boxes then disseminated amongst the group and all pay an equal share of the total monthly bill).

Anyone here have "acquaintances" doing the same? Is it easy enough to get away with? (asking for a friend)

I'm not doing it at the moment but it's easy as, as long as you have a foxtel outlet in your wall.

One person gets multi room, the others use that persons extra boxes at their houses, untraceable.

Or you can just use someones login for the Foxtel streaming service. Mrs HH3 used her mums up until her death, and now uses her sisters mother in laws.

It doesn't effect the account holder if they use it or not.

And no hardware requirements.

I do similar with my Foxtel streaming, I'm the primary account holder and a family member has the login details and the app on their phone to cast to a TV.

heater31 wrote:

HH3 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

JK wrote:Lots of (separate) mates lately been talking about how they share the cost of Foxtel (ie, 1 account holder rents additional boxes - Boxes then disseminated amongst the group and all pay an equal share of the total monthly bill).

Anyone here have "acquaintances" doing the same? Is it easy enough to get away with? (asking for a friend)

I'm not doing it at the moment but it's easy as, as long as you have a foxtel outlet in your wall.

One person gets multi room, the others use that persons extra boxes at their houses, untraceable.

Or you can just use someones login for the Foxtel streaming service. Mrs HH3 used her mums up until her death, and now uses her sisters mother in laws.

It doesn't effect the account holder if they use it or not.

And no hardware requirements.

I do similar with my Foxtel streaming, I'm the primary account holder and a family member has the login details and the app on their phone to cast to a TV.

Do you have to do that via mirroring, or can you somehow stream it straight to a smart TV via an App or something?

JK wrote:

heater31 wrote:

HH3 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:[quote="JK"]Lots of (separate) mates lately been talking about how they share the cost of Foxtel (ie, 1 account holder rents additional boxes - Boxes then disseminated amongst the group and all pay an equal share of the total monthly bill).

Anyone here have "acquaintances" doing the same? Is it easy enough to get away with? (asking for a friend)

I'm not doing it at the moment but it's easy as, as long as you have a foxtel outlet in your wall.

One person gets multi room, the others use that persons extra boxes at their houses, untraceable.

Or you can just use someones login for the Foxtel streaming service. Mrs HH3 used her mums up until her death, and now uses her sisters mother in laws.

It doesn't effect the account holder if they use it or not.

And no hardware requirements.

I do similar with my Foxtel streaming, I'm the primary account holder and a family member has the login details and the app on their phone to cast to a TV.

Do you have to do that via mirroring, or can you somehow stream it straight to a smart TV via an App or something?[/quote]Chromecast

why is it that when a politician or a member of the media question the behaviour of certain groups whether they be immigrants or not, why are they immediately called racist, nazi sympathisers etc etc yet the issue they are questioning is totally ignored and brushed under the carpet?

do our high ranking politicians think that by ignoring the problem that it will just go away, a sort of if we dont upset them they might be good and leave us alone mentality?

I just dont get it

Want to hear a funny?

A group protesting against "African gangs" are warned not to believe everything the mainstream media says about the "African gangs", refuse to listen, make up their own mind and protest anyway.

That same group goose step around sieg heiling with Australian flags draped around their backs and claim their not Nazi's and tell the rest of us to not believe what the mainstream media says about them.

I laughed, too.

The truth is somewhere in the middle.
Reimer is right leaning and doesn't hide it, Penbo is a Lefty but denies it.
Both have valid points, however it didnt take long for the topic to get missed and personal attacks to start.

stampy wrote:why is it that when a politician or a member of the media question the behaviour of certain groups whether they be immigrants or not, why are they immediately called racist, nazi sympathisers etc etc yet the issue they are questioning is totally ignored and brushed under the carpet?

do our high ranking politicians think that by ignoring the problem that it will just go away, a sort of if we dont upset them they might be good and leave us alone mentality?

I just dont get it

probably doing the nazi salute and spewing racist comments don't usually help their cause

woodublieve12 wrote:

stampy wrote:why is it that when a politician or a member of the media question the behaviour of certain groups whether they be immigrants or not, why are they immediately called racist, nazi sympathisers etc etc yet the issue they are questioning is totally ignored and brushed under the carpet?

do our high ranking politicians think that by ignoring the problem that it will just go away, a sort of if we dont upset them they might be good and leave us alone mentality?

I just dont get it

probably doing the nazi salute and spewing racist comments don't usually help their cause

you answer doesnt make sense to my question

The issue they were protesting against was African gangs, whilst doing so they goose stepped and offered a sieg heil.

Other than racist, what word would you prefer the media use?

booney you need to read my initial post as well

Booney wrote:The issue they were protesting against was African gangs, whilst doing so they goose stepped and offered a sieg heil.

Other than racist, what word would you prefer the media use?

the idiots offering the nazi shit were not part of the rally btw

stampy wrote:

Booney wrote:The issue they were protesting against was African gangs, whilst doing so they goose stepped and offered a sieg heil.

Other than racist, what word would you prefer the media use?

the idiots offering the nazi shit were not part of the rally btw

They were there, but not part of it?

stampy wrote:booney you need to read my initial post as well

I don't think the Victorian Police are ignoring or sweeping any issues of violence under the carpet, regardless of who the people or groups are that are doing the offending.

I only hope we see the same people who are fighting for justice ( in their eyes ) one day marching in memory of Jill Maher and Eurydice Dixon. I doubt we will though.

Living here, in the main, I believe the African gang violence is a media beat up. My 2 cents.

Corona Man wrote:Living here, in the main, I believe the African gang violence is a media beat up. My 2 cents.

Pun intended?

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Living here, in the main, I believe the African gang violence is a media beat up. My 2 cents.

Pun intended?

No it wasn’t!

stampy wrote:

Booney wrote:The issue they were protesting against was African gangs, whilst doing so they goose stepped and offered a sieg heil.

Other than racist, what word would you prefer the media use?

the idiots offering the nazi shit were not part of the rally btw

yes they were

Corona Man wrote:Living here, in the main, I believe the African gang violence is a media beat up. My 2 cents.

According to several friends (not known to each other and well-adjusted reasonable people) in Melbourne, it's definitely a problem.

JK wrote:

Corona Man wrote:Living here, in the main, I believe the African gang violence is a media beat up. My 2 cents.

According to several friends (not known to each other and well-adjusted reasonable people) in Melbourne, it's definitely a problem.

Walk down Rundle Mall after 7pm on a Friday night.