SA Footy

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:23 am**

Corona Man wrote:
stan wrote:Vic numbers alot better. Hopefully the Warden allows for more outside time.

All I want is a friggin' haircut.

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:29 am**

Pseudo wrote:
Corona Man wrote:
stan wrote:Vic numbers alot better. Hopefully the Warden allows for more outside time.

All I want is a friggin' haircut.

Modern problems have modern solutions.

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:38 am**

Corona Man wrote:
stan wrote:Vic numbers alot better. Hopefully the Warden allows for more outside time.

All I want is a friggin' haircut.

I've grown a pony tail for the time being.
The wife likes it.

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:49 am**

Psyber wrote:
Corona Man wrote:
stan wrote:Vic numbers alot better. Hopefully the Warden allows for more outside time.

All I want is a friggin' haircut.

I've grown a pony tail for the time being.
The wife likes it.

This is how I picture you

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 11:54 am**

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:02 pm**

Jim05 wrote:
Psyber wrote:
Corona Man wrote:
stan wrote:Vic numbers alot better. Hopefully the Warden allows for more outside time.

All I want is a friggin' haircut.

I've grown a pony tail for the time being.
The wife likes it.

This is how I picture you

Close but my hair is still brown with just grey streaks down the sides, my close trimmed beard is mostly white with a bit of dark speckle, and my dress style is a bit more casual - rarely ever wear a tie.

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:08 pm**

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:18 pm**

Somewhere in between the two... :lol:

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:18 pm**

Actually Booney's picture is close.

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 12:31 pm**

Pseudo wrote:
Corona Man wrote:
stan wrote:Vic numbers alot better. Hopefully the Warden allows for more outside time.

All I want is a friggin' haircut.

I have considered the clippers. However I have changed my mind, and decided to see this out, as my own personal protest against Dan. I look a bit like this.

Posted: **Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:24 pm**

From Apaches YOU TUBE

Yep another study that HCQ works.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVD76yu0Vc

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:02 pm**

Apachebulldog wrote:From Apaches YOU TUBE

Yep another study that HCQ works.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVD76yu0Vc

Reports in both the Lancet in the UK and the various medical profession sites in OZ tend to report that the cardiac and other health risks from using HCQ are greater than any potential benefit, and the the potential benefit is minimal. However, in every group, even among the professions, there will be dissidents with their own theories or vested interests who push their own agenda. The divergence is broader in the USA, possibly because of Trump's stand and the politicalisation of the issue there.

I've read a number of detailed papers arguing for HCG as a prophylactic or for treatment, and I'm interested personally because I'm in a vulnerable age group, but none of them have convinced me HCG is worth the risks of taking it.

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:35 pm**

I assume Psyber you are getting this from MSM (Main Stream Medicine).

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 5:42 pm**

Apachebulldog wrote:From Apaches YOU TUBE

Yep another study that HCQ works.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVD76yu0Vc

Has Pete Evans or any of your other heroes endorsed it yet?

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:00 pm**

Psyber wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:From Apaches YOU TUBE

Yep another study that HCQ works.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVD76yu0Vc

Reports in both the Lancet in the UK and the various medical profession sites in OZ tend to report that the cardiac and other health risks from using HCQ are greater than any potential benefit, and the the potential benefit is minimal. However, in every group, even among the professions, there will be dissidents with their own theories or vested interests who push their own agenda. The divergence is broader in the USA, possibly because of Trump's stand and the politicalisation of the issue there.

I've read a number of detailed papers arguing for HCG as a prophylactic or for treatment, and I'm interested personally because I'm in a vulnerable age group, but none of them have convinced me HCG is worth the risks of taking it.

Yes have seen some of these reports however do you realise the Lancet had to retract one of these reports as it ended up being a dodgy study.

Many more studies and reports since that dodgy article have all reported great results and there are still more studies being carried out with similar results.

As i have stated before if i ever catch this FLU i would take HCQ Combo to save my self wouldn't you ???????

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:04 pm**

The same people who believe there are more than 2 genders are now urging you to trust the "science"

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:13 pm**

Apachebulldog wrote:
Psyber wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:From Apaches YOU TUBE

Yep another study that HCQ works.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVD76yu0Vc

Reports in both the Lancet in the UK and the various medical profession sites in OZ tend to report that the cardiac and other health risks from using HCQ are greater than any potential benefit, and the the potential benefit is minimal. However, in every group, even among the professions, there will be dissidents with their own theories or vested interests who push their own agenda. The divergence is broader in the USA, possibly because of Trump's stand and the politicalisation of the issue there.

I've read a number of detailed papers arguing for HCG as a prophylactic or for treatment, and I'm interested personally because I'm in a vulnerable age group, but none of them have convinced me HCG is worth the risks of taking it.

Yes have seen some of these reports however do you realise the Lancet had to retract one of these reports as it ended up being a dodgy study.

Many more studies and reports since that dodgy article have all reported great results and there are still more studies being carried out with similar results.

As i have stated before if i ever catch this FLU i would take HCQ Combo to save my self wouldn't you ???????

PS I forgot to mention in that dodgy trial they overdosed those poor elderly with solely HCQ and 6 to 10 times the prescribed normal dose so guess what happens cardiac arrest.

If given at the normal prescribed dose of HCQ with Azrithomycin and Zinc the experts say it saves lives if administered early.

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 8:54 pm**

Listened to the news tonight and they reckon 70,000 people have had this virus but didn't know they had it.
How dangerous is this virus then?

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:30 pm**

Mythical Creature wrote:Listened to the news tonight and they reckon 70,000 people have had this virus but didn't know they had it.
How dangerous is this virus then?

You have answered your question mate.

Heres an interesting piece from Apaches YOU TUBE

Citizens all over the world are now finally waking up as witnessed by the tens of thousands protesting.

Montreal protest on the weekend estimates of 50,000 came out anti mask/covid protest and some of the vision i have seen verifies that estimate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxwTrYP7zBk

Cannot find the initial aerial vision i watched of this it there was definetely close to fifty thousand many streets were packed with protesters and procession for miles.

But truthful MSM over there reported that around 2,000 attended LOL thats the problem.

This has to be the best/greatest brainwashing of citizens in the history of mankind.

Posted: **Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:06 pm**

From Apaches YOU TUBE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGBEaYEtiys

So who agrees with DR Sanjeevs analysis of the Asian Flu in Victoria wow some pertinent statements he has made.

SA Footy

Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)

Re: Coronavirus (Covid19)