by kickinit » Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:22 am
by HH3 » Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:54 pm
by kickinit » Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:12 am
HH3 wrote:Wouldnt the Chromebook run on Google? Wouldnt have thought you'd be a fan for some reason?
by Dissident » Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:32 am
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 1:03 am
Dissident wrote:Cloud is cloud... it's existed before Apple had iCloud and many other people have Cloud/Cloud solutions. There is no issue there.
Well apart from the fact it will work. iCloud is horrible.
by Dissident » Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:49 am
by tipper » Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:53 am
Dissident wrote:wtf?
Are you still talking about cloud?
Google has had cloud services for ages.
As have many other companies. Apple is just one.
Do you think iCloud was "first"??
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:27 am
Dissident wrote:wtf?
Are you still talking about cloud?
Google has had cloud services for ages.
As have many other companies. Apple is just one.
Do you think iCloud was "first"??
by Dissident » Wed Apr 03, 2013 11:52 am
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:05 pm
by Dissident » Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:26 pm
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 5:54 pm
kickinit wrote:Dissident wrote:Cloud is cloud... it's existed before Apple had iCloud and many other people have Cloud/Cloud solutions. There is no issue there.
Well apart from the fact it will work. iCloud is horrible.
from a business point of view i'd be heading in the opposite direction for apple. does google want to be known as a company that just copy what apple does? I really don't get samsung they are a great company that makes some great products, but once again they are trying to make there products look likes apple.
Dissident wrote:wtf?
Are you still talking about cloud?
Google has had cloud services for ages.
As have many other companies. Apple is just one.
Do you think iCloud was "first"??
Dissident wrote:Irrelevant... I was asking about one issue you had
by HH3 » Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:15 pm
by Dissident » Wed Apr 03, 2013 7:43 pm
kickinit wrote:new chrome book looks pretty impressive. built in virus protection is a big plus. It's only new so only the acer and samsung in a 11" screen at the moment. samsung is $346 but only has a 16gb SSD and the acer is $298 with a 320GB HDD.
The one thing I don't like is it looks like they are trying to copy Apple or they want another lengthy legal battle. MacBook/ChromeBook, MacBook is a aluminium case with black key the samsung is a aluminium case (well it looks like) and black keys, Apple has the iCloud now google has the Cloud.
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:11 pm
Dissident wrote:kickinit wrote:new chrome book looks pretty impressive. built in virus protection is a big plus. It's only new so only the acer and samsung in a 11" screen at the moment. samsung is $346 but only has a 16gb SSD and the acer is $298 with a 320GB HDD.
The one thing I don't like is it looks like they are trying to copy Apple or they want another lengthy legal battle. MacBook/ChromeBook, MacBook is a aluminium case with black key the samsung is a aluminium case (well it looks like) and black keys, Apple has the iCloud now google has the Cloud.
You are intimating there that Google has copied Apple with the cloud.
No?
Yes.
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:13 pm
HH3 wrote:Well you quoted where Dissident was talking exclusively about cloud, which usually means you're responding to his remarks about cloud. The word "cloud" appears in the quote 6 times.
Maybe instead of quoting things you aren't going to talk about, you explain what you're talking about. From what you said, it seems like you're saying Google shouldnt copy Apple when it comes to iCloud.
by HH3 » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:17 pm
kickinit wrote:HH3 wrote:Well you quoted where Dissident was talking exclusively about cloud, which usually means you're responding to his remarks about cloud. The word "cloud" appears in the quote 6 times.
Maybe instead of quoting things you aren't going to talk about, you explain what you're talking about. From what you said, it seems like you're saying Google shouldnt copy Apple when it comes to iCloud.
I was talking about google and samsung copying apple, dissident even asked if I was talking about cloud, to which if he did re read what I was saying he would notice I referenced samsung which has nothing to do with cloud.
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:21 pm
by Dissident » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:27 pm
kickinit wrote:Dissident wrote:kickinit wrote:new chrome book looks pretty impressive. built in virus protection is a big plus. It's only new so only the acer and samsung in a 11" screen at the moment. samsung is $346 but only has a 16gb SSD and the acer is $298 with a 320GB HDD.
The one thing I don't like is it looks like they are trying to copy Apple or they want another lengthy legal battle. MacBook/ChromeBook, MacBook is a aluminium case with black key the samsung is a aluminium case (well it looks like) and black keys, Apple has the iCloud now google has the Cloud.
You are intimating there that Google has copied Apple with the cloud.
No?
Yes.
Yes and I also talk about macbook/chromebook and the fact that the samsung looks nearly identical to a macbook pro. Maybe you should re read the paragraph not just the part you want to.
by kickinit » Wed Apr 03, 2013 8:30 pm
HH3 wrote:kickinit wrote:HH3 wrote:Well you quoted where Dissident was talking exclusively about cloud, which usually means you're responding to his remarks about cloud. The word "cloud" appears in the quote 6 times.
Maybe instead of quoting things you aren't going to talk about, you explain what you're talking about. From what you said, it seems like you're saying Google shouldnt copy Apple when it comes to iCloud.
I was talking about google and samsung copying apple, dissident even asked if I was talking about cloud, to which if he did re read what I was saying he would notice I referenced samsung which has nothing to do with cloud.
Well why quote something that has absolutely nothing to do with what you're talking about?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |