Wareing 21 votes
should have got 22

by piccachu » Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:20 pm
Wareing 21 votes
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:04 pm
by S Demon » Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:26 pm
by teaoby » Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:44 pm
by piccachu » Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:50 pm
by valleys07 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:50 pm
teaoby wrote:i did have to have a laugh last night when some of the votes came up eg. we beat kilburn by 30goals and pressler got 2 votes (he did play well but really!?) and some of the exec committee even had a raised eyebrow
by mav » Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:53 pm
valleys07 wrote:teaoby wrote:i did have to have a laugh last night when some of the votes came up eg. we beat kilburn by 30goals and pressler got 2 votes (he did play well but really!?) and some of the exec committee even had a raised eyebrow
![]()
![]()
![]()
FFS umps the medal isnt an encouragement award! how can a side be done by 30 goals and have a player feature in the best 3 on the ground???
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:33 pm
mav wrote:valleys07 wrote:teaoby wrote:i did have to have a laugh last night when some of the votes came up eg. we beat kilburn by 30goals and pressler got 2 votes (he did play well but really!?) and some of the exec committee even had a raised eyebrow
![]()
![]()
![]()
FFS umps the medal isnt an encouragement award! how can a side be done by 30 goals and have a player feature in the best 3 on the ground???
why can't one person in a losing team play well? Obviously the rest of the team were pretty ordinary.
by teaoby » Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:52 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:mav wrote:valleys07 wrote:teaoby wrote:i did have to have a laugh last night when some of the votes came up eg. we beat kilburn by 30goals and pressler got 2 votes (he did play well but really!?) and some of the exec committee even had a raised eyebrow
![]()
![]()
![]()
FFS umps the medal isnt an encouragement award! how can a side be done by 30 goals and have a player feature in the best 3 on the ground???
why can't one person in a losing team play well? Obviously the rest of the team were pretty ordinary.
as were 20 other PAOC players...
by turbo182 » Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:10 am
by HawkieRanger » Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:40 am
by Hardy Hit » Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:55 am
by Sturtman » Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:01 am
Hardy Hit wrote:Tips
A's
Mitcham to upset Portland - 4 goals - Hawks to end Portlands finals Campaign. To be even in the first half, but the Hawks to break away in the 2nd with the div1 standard ball movement and hard running.
PAOC over Iggies - 5 goals - OI didn't play 4 quarters of footy last week, and if they cant put four quarters together against PAC, they cant win
B's
Mitcham over SMOSH - 1 goals - down to the wire, but Mitcham B's havent lost at the 'Thunderdome' for a long time now and should continue the good form from last weeks second half.
PAOC over Seaton - 3 goals - Seaton in good form, but cant see them stopping Pacs midfield
C's
Mitcham over Para Hills - 5 goals - If Elton can kick straight this week, the Hawks should get through. They dispayed a good brand of footy on Sunday comfortably accounting for SMOSH all over the ground.
PAC over Seaton - 6 goals - PAC simply too good
Good weekends for Mitcham and PAC!!!
by valleys07 » Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:05 am
mav wrote:valleys07 wrote:teaoby wrote:i did have to have a laugh last night when some of the votes came up eg. we beat kilburn by 30goals and pressler got 2 votes (he did play well but really!?) and some of the exec committee even had a raised eyebrow
![]()
![]()
![]()
FFS umps the medal isnt an encouragement award! how can a side be done by 30 goals and have a player feature in the best 3 on the ground???
why can't one person in a losing team play well? Obviously the rest of the team were pretty ordinary.
by HawkieRanger » Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:10 am
Sturtman wrote:Hardy Hit wrote:Tips
A's
Mitcham to upset Portland - 4 goals - Hawks to end Portlands finals Campaign. To be even in the first half, but the Hawks to break away in the 2nd with the div1 standard ball movement and hard running.
PAOC over Iggies - 5 goals - OI didn't play 4 quarters of footy last week, and if they cant put four quarters together against PAC, they cant win
B's
Mitcham over SMOSH - 1 goals - down to the wire, but Mitcham B's havent lost at the 'Thunderdome' for a long time now and should continue the good form from last weeks second half.
PAOC over Seaton - 3 goals - Seaton in good form, but cant see them stopping Pacs midfield
C's
Mitcham over Para Hills - 5 goals - If Elton can kick straight this week, the Hawks should get through. They dispayed a good brand of footy on Sunday comfortably accounting for SMOSH all over the ground.
PAC over Seaton - 6 goals - PAC simply too good
Good weekends for Mitcham and PAC!!!
Dont be scared to pump yourself up a bit Hardy![]()
by Footy Chick » Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:48 pm
Hawkie Ranger wrote:our "highly intelligent coach"
by piccachu » Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:53 pm
by teaoby » Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:12 pm
by teaoby » Fri Aug 27, 2010 2:35 pm
by SATCHEL » Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:39 pm
teaoby wrote:portland - by 10pts think mitcham have done thier dash
PAC - by 20pts big ground of thebby will help us
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |