SAAFL Div C2 (2011)

[Punk Rooster]

(tentative) Teams:

Adelaide University
Old Ignatians
Ovingham
Payneham NU
Port District
Prince Alfred OC
Rostrevor OC
St Peter's OC
Walkerville

[finn]

take modbury and athelstone out (div 7) and add wingfield please punk

[Footy Chick]

I'm just going to take out the C grades until they're finalised. too hard...

[Punk Rooster]

will be altered when official.

[SATCHEL]

Whatever the sides. After the year they have had I would say that due to the depth of the club and how they play the game. Prince Alfred will have no issue playing in the top 2 division's. Fantastic teams right through

[teaoby]

C'S GOING FOR 4 IN A ROW!

[finn]

C'S GOING FOR 4 IN A ROW!

and will find it a fair bit harder....
looking forward to having to travel to park 9 from park 10...

[SATCHEL]

C'S GOING FOR 4 IN A ROW!

and will find it a fair bit harder....
looking forward to having to travel to park 9 from park 10...

Sorry Teaoby, i would take park 10 over 9 anyday. Played my first game back in 5 years at park 10 for the thunder. The patch of grass in both forward lines should be transplanted to park 9 for enmergency surgery. Also the Cranio Facial Unit should come in and operate on the facilities of park 9. Going up the Divs should make it a certainty you fix your rooms up. Surely?

Sorry mate we had this debate already. Coulnt resist. Should be a great contest between you both. Will the Poo shoot play on next year (sorry, Power fan. Couldn't resist that one either)

[Jimmy_041]

You are like a broken record Marbles - would better changerooms make you a better player or Portland C's win more games?

Time for the cement porridge.....

[finn]

is the duck darren thomas going around again jimmy or teaoby?

[SATCHEL]

You are like a broken record Marbles - would better changerooms make you a better player or Portland C's win more games?

Time for the cement porridge.....

Obviously the $$$'s spent on a private education didnt have a class on how to realy read something when it's in jest. It was all tongue in cheek you clown. I couldn't care less about your rooms. An observation on the comparison was all it was pal. Relax a little and ill pass the spoon back to you with the jar half eaten so you can get some too.

[teaoby]

Finn. which Uni team is the C2 team? is it the chardonnay's?

[finn]

Finn. which Uni team is the C2 team? is it the chardonnay's?

it was the chardonnays last year - who knows about 2011 but I'd expect it to be a pretty close approximation.
do you know some of the chards?

[teaoby]

i know a stack of lads from the blacks in general. will be some entertaining matches in all grades next year

[LMA]

I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

[Jimmy_041]

We've lost a lot of the older C Grade players but 4 sides in the GF this year does show depth

[finn]

I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

i'll disagree with that opinion - having coached at c1/c2 level for last five years and watched many a c4 game before us - the standard of the top teams is much better - but the lower/mid ranked sides are reasonably similiar but rarely challenge those top teams. There are occasionally good sides in c5/c6 which can make it seem that the level is similiar.

The Princes' Premiership C grade side of 2009 would not have got close to any of the 2010 c2-c1 grand final sides.

But I guess that's the beauty of a new season - we all start out equal.

[Jimmy_041]

I'll stick my neck out here and say our 2010 team would have beaten our 2009 team by 10 goals every week.

I can see how many 2009 B Grade played in C's and 2009 C Grade in D's

[LMA]

I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

i'll disagree with that opinion - having coached at c1/c2 level for last five years and watched many a c4 game before us - the standard of the top teams is much better - but the lower/mid ranked sides are reasonably similiar but rarely challenge those top teams. There are occasionally good sides in c5/c6 which can make it seem that the level is similiar.

The Princes' Premiership C grade side of 2009 would not have got close to any of the 2010 c2-c1 grand final sides.

But I guess that's the beauty of a new season - we all start out equal.

Having played C6, C4 and C1 personally I haven't found that much difference in standard in the years I played in those divs, however that's only a point of view from the position I play.

I thought you coached the C6 side a few years back Finn?

[finn]

I think the Princes will be too good in this comp, not much difference from C4-C1 IMO

i'll disagree with that opinion - having coached at c1/c2 level for last five years and watched many a c4 game before us - the standard of the top teams is much better - but the lower/mid ranked sides are reasonably similiar but rarely challenge those top teams. There are occasionally good sides in c5/c6 which can make it seem that the level is similiar.

The Princes' Premiership C grade side of 2009 would not have got close to any of the 2010 c2-c1 grand final sides.

But I guess that's the beauty of a new season - we all start out equal.

Having played C6, C4 and C1 personally I haven't found that much difference in standard in the years I played in those divs, however that's only a point of view from the position I play.

I thought you coached the C6 side a few years back Finn?

nope, i wobbled around in a forward pocket then coached the afternoon game.
probably the bottom ten players are consistently better in the higher c grades.