by redandblack » Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:20 pm
by TroyGFC » Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:09 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:11 pm
TroyGFC wrote:With that title I thought Pram lady was going to produce two-headed players for westies!!
by PhilH » Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:43 pm
by bayman » Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:44 pm
by redandblack » Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:23 pm
PhilH wrote:While they are down there, get the Devils to leave the VFL for SANFL.
10th team dilema solved, with a much shorter & cheaper trip to Tassie required rather than Darwin
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:10 pm
by Punk Rooster » Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:45 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Spiritof64 » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:14 am
Punk Rooster wrote:Shouldn't West be spending money on juniors/improving facilities?
What financial benefits will they get?
by Mickyj » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:36 am
Spiritof64 wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Shouldn't West be spending money on juniors/improving facilities?
What financial benefits will they get?
West Junior Development Policy =
1. Wait till South develops a heap of talented juniors in areas abounding West Zone.
2. Change the zone.
(or has that changed post Doug?)
by redandblack » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:37 am
Spiritof64 wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Shouldn't West be spending money on juniors/improving facilities?
What financial benefits will they get?
West Junior Development Policy =
1. Wait till South develops a heap of talented juniors in areas abounding West Zone.
2. Change the zone.
(or has that changed post Doug?)
by Wedgie » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:02 am
redandblack wrote:Spiritof64 wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Shouldn't West be spending money on juniors/improving facilities?
What financial benefits will they get?
West Junior Development Policy =
1. Wait till South develops a heap of talented juniors in areas abounding West Zone.
2. Change the zone.
(or has that changed post Doug?)
![]()
How long since the boundaries were changed, SO64? i think our 2006 Under 17's premiership team would have been about 2 at the time.
Not that you carry a grudge
by sturt1 » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:09 am
Wedgie wrote:Christ, they better win otherwise it'll be embarassing for the SANFL, go West!
PS I think they should spend more time and money on worrying about premierships instead of jetting all over the country!
by Wedgie » Sat Feb 10, 2007 10:15 am
sturt1 wrote:Wedgie wrote:Christ, they better win otherwise it'll be embarassing for the SANFL, go West!
PS I think they should spend more time and money on worrying about premierships instead of jetting all over the country!
You guys better win in South Africa for the same reason
by redandblack » Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:14 am
by sturt1 » Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:17 pm
Wedgie wrote:sturt1 wrote:Wedgie wrote:Christ, they better win otherwise it'll be embarassing for the SANFL, go West!
PS I think they should spend more time and money on worrying about premierships instead of jetting all over the country!
You guys better win in South Africa for the same reason
Pfft, we beat a state side last year, we'll cream a club side!
by Spiritof64 » Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:54 pm
redandblack wrote:Spiritof64 wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Shouldn't West be spending money on juniors/improving facilities?
What financial benefits will they get?
West Junior Development Policy =
1. Wait till South develops a heap of talented juniors in areas abounding West Zone.
2. Change the zone.
(or has that changed post Doug?)
![]()
How long since the boundaries were changed, SO64? i think our 2006 Under 17's premiership team would have been about 2 at the time.
Not that you carry a grudge
by Blacky » Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:10 pm
by Coorong » Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |