by oldeagle » Sun May 06, 2012 7:11 pm
by bigstack » Sun May 06, 2012 7:24 pm
oldeagle wrote:I'm not a SACA advocate but I do know they actively try to get grade clubs to build the community club bridge. From my experience there a number of players who supposedly "could have been anything" apart from the fact that when push comes to shove they not consistent and don't want to do the hard yards. I would be very surprised if there is an 18 - 30 year old out there in community club cricket who has the determination to play 1st class cricket and is not in the system
by smac » Sun May 06, 2012 7:28 pm
by oldeagle » Sun May 06, 2012 7:34 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun May 06, 2012 7:40 pm
smac wrote:I wouldn't knock what country cricket gets.
Pound for pound, they do extremely well.
by daysofourlives » Sun May 06, 2012 7:40 pm
oldeagle wrote:If I keep this up I'll be working for SACA soon. There is the Les Favell Foundation Scholarship for country kids
recipients last season were.
Samantha Betts
Mark Smith
Isaac Boylan
Tom Hawthorne
Tyson Panagiotou
Shaun Reilly
Aiden McGregor-Baptista
by smac » Sun May 06, 2012 7:45 pm
MadMax wrote:Perhaps SACA need to realise what roles community clubs play in the development of future cricketers and what they do well. I know that our community club has seen a lot of cricketers go to District level and come back a season or two later because they don't enjoy the culture nor support network at those clubs.
As much as we encourage them to explore the possibilities of playing at a higher level, they are young adults and make their own decisions and unfortunately have all come back to play with mates and with clubs that "know" them and their abilities. Perhaps some of the grant money could be used to reward those responsible, well managed community clubs that are nurturing the future talent and more interaction from state based talent scouts and coaches at that level. Develop some grassroots interaction and even community-based cricketing "hubs" that assist the talented cricketers avenue to more focused levels of training and playing etc in an environment they know and are comfortable in.
by oldeagle » Sun May 06, 2012 7:53 pm
smac wrote:MadMax wrote:Perhaps SACA need to realise what roles community clubs play in the development of future cricketers and what they do well. I know that our community club has seen a lot of cricketers go to District level and come back a season or two later because they don't enjoy the culture nor support network at those clubs.
As much as we encourage them to explore the possibilities of playing at a higher level, they are young adults and make their own decisions and unfortunately have all come back to play with mates and with clubs that "know" them and their abilities. Perhaps some of the grant money could be used to reward those responsible, well managed community clubs that are nurturing the future talent and more interaction from state based talent scouts and coaches at that level. Develop some grassroots interaction and even community-based cricketing "hubs" that assist the talented cricketers avenue to more focused levels of training and playing etc in an environment they know and are comfortable in.
Any player that can't cope at grade level won't ever be a first class cricketer.
by smac » Sun May 06, 2012 8:07 pm
daysofourlives wrote:smac wrote:I wouldn't knock what country cricket gets.
Pound for pound, they do extremely well.
What do they get SMAC?
Kids in the country who make the squads that travel to adelaide to play in the SACA run carnivals of which there is even more levels now u12 through to u17 are required to pay $100 each for the pleasure. If a family ahs 2 or 3 talented boys thats a big cost.
Country clubs do alot to get kids involved in the game keeping subs very low at around $20 per season as well as supplying shirts. They are in effect subsidised by the senior players.
IMO SACA should be funding these carnivals, after all it is making their jobs much easier in identifying talent in the country areas. I also feel there should be less of these carnivals i.e 2 year age intervals to get a higher concentration of talent
by smac » Sun May 06, 2012 8:09 pm
by smac » Sun May 06, 2012 8:10 pm
daysofourlives wrote:oldeagle wrote:If I keep this up I'll be working for SACA soon. There is the Les Favell Foundation Scholarship for country kids
recipients last season were.
Samantha Betts
Mark Smith
Isaac Boylan
Tom Hawthorne
Tyson Panagiotou
Shaun Reilly
Aiden McGregor-Baptista
Funded by whom???
by oldeagle » Sun May 06, 2012 8:11 pm
daysofourlives wrote:oldeagle wrote:If I keep this up I'll be working for SACA soon. There is the Les Favell Foundation Scholarship for country kids
recipients last season were.
Samantha Betts
Mark Smith
Isaac Boylan
Tom Hawthorne
Tyson Panagiotou
Shaun Reilly
Aiden McGregor-Baptista
Funded by whom???
by tigerpie » Sun May 06, 2012 8:19 pm
by oldeagle » Sun May 06, 2012 8:27 pm
by smac » Sun May 06, 2012 8:28 pm
tigerpie wrote:SMAC it would be nice to get the money saca owe us for hosting these country carnival games.Its only $1000 and we have to wait for ages and constantly have to chase them up for payment. i.e its now may and we hosted these games in january.
Our club goes to a lot of effort when hosting these games, making sure the facilities are open and the ground and wicket are tip top.
by Footy Smart » Mon May 07, 2012 9:25 am
tigerpie wrote:Have been reading this thread with great interest.
SMAC have to agree with ditching the whites, and your comment regarding horrible motivation for having them.
I would like to see a graph of junior cricket participation rates over the last 10 years. I feel its dropped at community level, in some areas pretty drastically over the last 3 years. Why not have the whites lads posted back to community clubs and being put on notice that with form they can get in the reds. They train 1 night with grade club and 1 with community club. This will help bolster junior cricket at cc level.
As for the $50 000 crickey!!! My club would like a slice of that and so would all the others. Maintaining good turf facilities costs money and with water bills on the rise some help financially in these areas would be a god send!
Why doesnt cc see any significant monies? Some do as much in the way of quality coaching and facilities. CC clubs pay for level 1-2-3 coaching accreditation for their coaches and then they bugger off and coach junior grade clubs as has happened to my club.. Should the cc clubs be re-imbursed for these payments?
by The Hound » Mon May 07, 2012 10:11 am
tigerpie wrote:SMAC it would be nice to get the money saca owe us for hosting these country carnival games.Its only $1000 and we have to wait for ages and constantly have to chase them up for payment. i.e its now may and we hosted these games in january.
Our club goes to a lot of effort when hosting these games, making sure the facilities are open and the ground and wicket are tip top.
by tigerpie » Mon May 07, 2012 11:40 am
Footy Smart wrote:tigerpie wrote:Have been reading this thread with great interest.
SMAC have to agree with ditching the whites, and your comment regarding horrible motivation for having them.
I would like to see a graph of junior cricket participation rates over the last 10 years. I feel its dropped at community level, in some areas pretty drastically over the last 3 years. Why not have the whites lads posted back to community clubs and being put on notice that with form they can get in the reds. They train 1 night with grade club and 1 with community club. This will help bolster junior cricket at cc level.
As for the $50 000 crickey!!! My club would like a slice of that and so would all the others. Maintaining good turf facilities costs money and with water bills on the rise some help financially in these areas would be a god send!
Why doesnt cc see any significant monies? Some do as much in the way of quality coaching and facilities. CC clubs pay for level 1-2-3 coaching accreditation for their coaches and then they bugger off and coach junior grade clubs as has happened to my club.. Should the cc clubs be re-imbursed for these payments?
Bit rich TP to have a go at a bloke who gave a fair few years service to your club and was presented with an opportunity that doesnt come up that often. Cant begrudge a bloke for leaving to coach at a higher level.... same with a player who leaves to a higher level (this is not putting down Reynella at all from all reports a proud/well run club).
by heater31 » Mon May 07, 2012 11:59 am
tigerpie wrote:Footy Smart wrote:tigerpie wrote:Have been reading this thread with great interest.
SMAC have to agree with ditching the whites, and your comment regarding horrible motivation for having them.
I would like to see a graph of junior cricket participation rates over the last 10 years. I feel its dropped at community level, in some areas pretty drastically over the last 3 years. Why not have the whites lads posted back to community clubs and being put on notice that with form they can get in the reds. They train 1 night with grade club and 1 with community club. This will help bolster junior cricket at cc level.
As for the $50 000 crickey!!! My club would like a slice of that and so would all the others. Maintaining good turf facilities costs money and with water bills on the rise some help financially in these areas would be a god send!
Why doesnt cc see any significant monies? Some do as much in the way of quality coaching and facilities. CC clubs pay for level 1-2-3 coaching accreditation for their coaches and then they bugger off and coach junior grade clubs as has happened to my club.. Should the cc clubs be re-imbursed for these payments?
Bit rich TP to have a go at a bloke who gave a fair few years service to your club and was presented with an opportunity that doesnt come up that often. Cant begrudge a bloke for leaving to coach at a higher level.... same with a player who leaves to a higher level (this is not putting down Reynella at all from all reports a proud/well run club).
Not having a go at the bloke, have not and would not begrudge anyone wanting to coach at a higher level or a player wanting to play grade cricket. My point is that saca or ca should pay for coaches to achieve these levels of coaching not community clubs. If the bloke goes to coach higher levels of cricket then that knowledge base is lost to said community club.
by tigerpie » Mon May 07, 2012 2:01 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |