by LMA » Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:58 pm
by dedja » Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:05 pm
by RustyCage » Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:19 pm
by BZB27 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:26 pm
Bully wrote:Brayman19 wrote:I thought that channel nine was gonna use gem to show other sports aswell. Instead of having the exact same thing on. Just seems a bit pointless to me havin the same thing on two channels.
get foxtel. you can see it all
by brod » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:41 pm
by Squawk » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:15 am
LMA wrote:Even the 9 website is shite, hard to find event times and vague at that
by PhilH » Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:56 pm
by Magpiespower » Thu Aug 02, 2012 2:18 pm
by GWW » Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:41 pm
by kickinit » Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:27 am
by RustyCage » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:22 am
AD nauseum _ it's that feeling Olympics fans get after the same advertisements for Big Brother and other upcoming shows interrupt Channel Nine's coverage, over and over and over.
And over.
But the network's saturation strategy, where the same ads are televised on high rotation throughout the Games, could backfire, according to industry experts.
Tim Burrowes, editor-in-chief of media and marketing website Mumbrella, described it yesterday as a "brute-force'' approach to promotions.
"To an extent, that approach does work because it absolutely raises awareness,'' he said.
"But it also means that people have very strong opinions going into it, one way or the other.''
"If this were a more traditional advertiser, they would probably have a far more sophisticated array of ads and different executions, but in this case it does seem like quite a limited amount and they're hitting the same group of people again and again and again with it, more than most advertisers would in such a short period of time.''
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:02 pm
by Keefy » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:09 pm
kickinit wrote:so for all of those complaining about channel 9 coverage how much did you pay for your subscription?
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:45 pm
kickinit wrote:so for all of those complaining about channel 9 coverage how much did you pay for your subscription?
by HH3 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:51 pm
kickinit wrote:so for all of those complaining about channel 9 coverage how much did you pay for your subscription?
by Dogwatcher » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:08 pm
by scoob » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:14 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I'm surprised no one's complained about ABC radio cutting to Delroy for a couple of hours at night.
I'm a fan of the program but I want to be listening to the Olympics as I doze off at night, not The Challenge.
by kickinit » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:59 pm
scoob wrote:kickinit wrote:so for all of those complaining about channel 9 coverage how much did you pay for your subscription?
You point being - if you don't pay for it you can't complain?
HH3 wrote:kickinit wrote:so for all of those complaining about channel 9 coverage how much did you pay for your subscription?
I buy the shit advertised to me on that channel. My money goes from the company I bought it from to Channel 9 to pay for advertising. That money goes to the Olympic games coverage. The Olympic Games coverage is shithouse.
by RustyCage » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:02 pm
by HH3 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:34 pm
kickinit wrote:
So you are forced to buy what they advertise? Its your choice to buy what they advertise as you have no obligation to buy anything.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |