by FOURTH ESTATE » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:41 pm
by locky801 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:43 pm
by S Demon » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:05 pm
by Yardy Lard » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:28 pm
by Boosh » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:09 am
by LaughingKookaburra » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:44 am
by S Demon » Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:37 am
Boosh wrote:If you have been deregistered 99 times out of 100 you deserved it, and the rules for being let back are applied because you are dangerous.
by Gatt_Weasel » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:04 am
by jo172 » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:20 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:league will be treading a fine line with this one if something does go wrong i expect to see SAAFL in court.....
by Gatt_Weasel » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:35 am
jo172 wrote:I love the occasional attitude around here that there are innocent victims going around getting deregistered.
Anyone who gets deregistered deserves it. The League is better off without them. Personally, I'm astonished that the League is even considering letting them back in.Gatt_Weasel wrote:league will be treading a fine line with this one if something does go wrong i expect to see SAAFL in court.....
I think you'll find that your Supreme Court filing fee well and truly eats up any $2,000 you hope to get back.
Also, the Court would be incredibly reluctant to interfere with a domestic disciplinary tribunal.
by jo172 » Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:48 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:jo172 wrote:I love the occasional attitude around here that there are innocent victims going around getting deregistered.
Anyone who gets deregistered deserves it. The League is better off without them. Personally, I'm astonished that the League is even considering letting them back in.Gatt_Weasel wrote:league will be treading a fine line with this one if something does go wrong i expect to see SAAFL in court.....
I think you'll find that your Supreme Court filing fee well and truly eats up any $2,000 you hope to get back.
Also, the Court would be incredibly reluctant to interfere with a domestic disciplinary tribunal.
some of the players in question have kicked people in the head while on the ground cause eye injuries resulting in surgery king hits resulted in broken jaws etc etc
this is the cream of the crop the knuckle heads of the sport.......personally if im hit or hurt that requires me to miss actual work due to a thug or scum bag reinstated by the league shit im on a one way ticket to court with my lawyer at the end of the day the league by letting them in is providing me with a unsafe environment let them play against these players then and then see if they change attitude towards this
by superlative steve » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:24 am
by Fricky » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:39 am
by Footy Chick » Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:42 am
by Gatt_Weasel » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:03 pm
Footy Chick wrote:I'm not sure of the exact reason either but when the 12 game rule was first brought in, everyone complained because there was no right of appeal.
So the league listens to the clubsa and now there's a right of appeal and everyone is still whinging.
by Footy Chick » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:30 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Footy Follower » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:39 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:Footy Chick wrote:I'm not sure of the exact reason either but when the 12 game rule was first brought in, everyone complained because there was no right of appeal.
So the league listens to the clubsa and now there's a right of appeal and everyone is still whinging.
um footy chick people complained because over 2-5 years they were rubbed out for total of 12 games etc the players we are talking about have been rubbed out for 5-10 weeks for one offense then done another offense of equal value to be rubbed out for life
yes people with minor offenses have every right to appeal but the others should not be allowed to appeal full stop
by Footy Chick » Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:42 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Cohiba » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:28 pm
Footy Chick wrote:I'm not sure of the exact reason either but when the 12 game rule was first brought in, everyone complained because there was no right of appeal.
So the league listens to the clubsa and now there's a right of appeal and everyone is still whinging.
by Footy Chick » Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:32 pm
Cohiba wrote:Footy Chick wrote:I'm not sure of the exact reason either but when the 12 game rule was first brought in, everyone complained because there was no right of appeal.
So the league listens to the clubsa and now there's a right of appeal and everyone is still whinging.
Not everyone FC........
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |