pafc1870 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Exactly right
Andy D has played a part in this mess
Cant see how he keeps his job
by Jim05 » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:09 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Exactly right
by RustyCage » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:15 pm
Jim05 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Exactly right
Andy D has played a part in this mess
Cant see how he keeps his job
by Sky Pilot » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:17 pm
Jim05 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Exactly right
Andy D has played a part in this mess
Cant see how he keeps his job
by RustyCage » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:25 pm
by daysofourlives » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:58 pm
Jim05 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Dont disagree there Hondo but blackmailing isnt the way for the AFL to go about it.
They are basically saying if Hird pleads guilty then the others are not guilty, if he pleads not guilty they are all guilty.
The law just doesnt work like that.
The other 3 are either guilty or not.
They should be offering Hird 12 months and if he he doesnt accept and is found guilty they up to it 2-3 years
by Sky Pilot » Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:32 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Dont disagree there Hondo but blackmailing isnt the way for the AFL to go about it.
They are basically saying if Hird pleads guilty then the others are not guilty, if he pleads not guilty they are all guilty.
The law just doesnt work like that.
The other 3 are either guilty or not.
They should be offering Hird 12 months and if he he doesnt accept and is found guilty they up to it 2-3 years
It's not blackmail
It's not the law they are dealing with it's the AFL rules and the AFL can interpret them any way they like.
Hird is being a DH and for the good of the club needs to take it.
Make no mistake if Hird keeps this up he will be disgraced and even his own fans will start turn on him.
by Turbo » Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:53 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Dont disagree there Hondo but blackmailing isnt the way for the AFL to go about it.
They are basically saying if Hird pleads guilty then the others are not guilty, if he pleads not guilty they are all guilty.
The law just doesnt work like that.
The other 3 are either guilty or not.
They should be offering Hird 12 months and if he he doesnt accept and is found guilty they up to it 2-3 years
It's not blackmail
It's not the law they are dealing with it's the AFL rules and the AFL can interpret them any way they like.
Hird is being a DH and for the good of the club needs to take it.
Make no mistake if Hird keeps this up he will be disgraced and even his own fans will start turn on him.
You know faaark all about Essendon days. We will never turn on James Hird. Never. Get it?
by Magpiespower » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:41 pm
by Zelezny Chucks » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:23 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:Hondo wrote:Jim this is Hird's own doing
His own mess
Dont disagree there Hondo but blackmailing isnt the way for the AFL to go about it.
They are basically saying if Hird pleads guilty then the others are not guilty, if he pleads not guilty they are all guilty.
The law just doesnt work like that.
The other 3 are either guilty or not.
They should be offering Hird 12 months and if he he doesnt accept and is found guilty they up to it 2-3 years
It's not blackmail
It's not the law they are dealing with it's the AFL rules and the AFL can interpret them any way they like.
Hird is being a DH and for the good of the club needs to take it.
Make no mistake if Hird keeps this up he will be disgraced and even his own fans will start turn on him.
You know faaark all about Essendon days. We will never turn on James Hird. Never. Get it?
by daysofourlives » Thu Aug 15, 2013 10:48 pm
by tigerpie » Fri Aug 16, 2013 9:33 am
by Psyber » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:45 pm
by Turbo » Sat Aug 17, 2013 2:54 pm
by Magpiespower » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:00 pm
by Vulcan » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:03 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:10 pm
Vulcan wrote:That's it for me, I am not watching anymore of this crap this year, and add to this I will not watch another game if jetta, davey, or pears are playing.
by Jim05 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:11 pm
Magpiespower wrote:All I know is I'll be barracking for Essendon against Carlton this week.
GO BOMBERS!!!
by Sky Pilot » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:19 pm
Jim05 wrote:Magpiespower wrote:All I know is I'll be barracking for Essendon against Carlton this week.
GO BOMBERS!!!
Carlton by 70+
We wouldnt beat an amateur side ATM
by Turbo » Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:26 pm
Jim05 wrote:Magpiespower wrote:All I know is I'll be barracking for Essendon against Carlton this week.
GO BOMBERS!!!
Carlton by 70+
We wouldnt beat an amateur side ATM
by Turbo » Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:50 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |